I am interested if those have you that have shot both, have seen a noticeable difference in the two?
I am looking for feed back from those of you that either own or have shot both the 3.3 and 4.0, preferably the same caliber. Apples to apples.
It is easier for me to shoot a larger gun more accurately/faster than a smaller gun. There is effetivley no difference from 0- 10 feet, but 10 to 25+ feet the difference very noticeable. My experience has been the 3 inch guns are sub compact single stacks and the 4 inch have been larger double stacks. So there is more than just a 1 inch difference in barrel length/sight radius. Not really a fair comparison.
My closest comparison has been between the XDS 9 and 45 and the Glock 26/27, and as far a accuracy and speed there is really not a big difference.
I am looking for feed back from those of you that either own or have shot both the 3.3 and 4.0, preferably the same caliber. Apples to apples.
It is easier for me to shoot a larger gun more accurately/faster than a smaller gun. There is effetivley no difference from 0- 10 feet, but 10 to 25+ feet the difference very noticeable. My experience has been the 3 inch guns are sub compact single stacks and the 4 inch have been larger double stacks. So there is more than just a 1 inch difference in barrel length/sight radius. Not really a fair comparison.
My closest comparison has been between the XDS 9 and 45 and the Glock 26/27, and as far a accuracy and speed there is really not a big difference.