Springfield XD Forum banner

XD9SC w/factory Trijicon, sights not aligned

975 views 7 replies 7 participants last post by  thehinge 
#1 ·
I'm looking for guidance on this, I have several pistols including a couple XD45's for years,

I just got my first XD9SC w/factory night sights, and am consistently hitting 4" high and 4" left @ 25meters w/a sample of 200 shots from a bench rest, my groups are very tight (about 2"). All my other XD's are in perfect sight alignment.

should i pursue warranty fix on this, live with it, or ?? i'd hate for them to mess it up further, and don't really like sending it back and forth to them, and bought it mail order.

thanks!
 
#2 ·
I had a very similar issue with my 45 compact. I contacted them, they ran the serial number and verified the sights were factory installed. They sent me a shipping label for me to overnight it to them, I had it back in less than 2 weeks overnighted and fixed. SA's service is excellent, they will not screw it up.
 
#4 ·
My factory xd9sc sights were off too. The rear sight was off to the left.

Look at the sights. Are they between the two factory marks?

My rear sight was covering the left factory mark, thus making everything I shot off to the left.

I adjusted them myself, but had to use the sight pusher. There is no way in hell are you going to be able to move those things without one.
 
#5 ·
This issue seems to keep coming up, so I'll copy my comments from a previous post:

I recently purchased a new XD-9sc w/ factory installed Trijicon tritium night sights. The gun came with the front sight so loose that you could move it side-to-side in the dovetail with your finger. The rear sight was installed biased to the left as viewed from the shooting position. Springfield Armory authorized a return of the slide to fix the front sight, and, in twelve days' turnaround time, I received it with a solidly attached front sight, although they did not explain what the fix entailed, contrary to my request. Finally able to take it to the range, it definitely shot left, easily fixable by moving the rear sight to the right with a gunsmith's sight pusher. My point - although SA has good customer service, where the sight alignment and installation comes in, they may have some quality control isssues.

It was evident from looking at the rear sight that it was not centered between the index lines on the slide. But, of course, shooting it is the real test as to whether sight adjustment is necessary, and, in my case, adjustment to center was appropriate.
 
#6 ·
although SA has good customer service, where the sight alignment and installation comes in, they may have some quality control issues.

Muffled cough sounding vaguely like "Bull(droppings)"

I'd ask you to prove this and no doubt you could go into some discourse that would seem to do so and the war would be on. Instead let's look at the mathematics (and practicalities) of sight alignment. By doing that we will have some reasonable standard upon which to base a discussion instead of a flame war.

There are two distinct elements to proper sight alignment:
1) Pattern, also called group, which can be thought of as tightness, i.e. three or more shots, made under identical conditions where the bullet strikes are in obvious close proximity to one another. Typically a circle of 2 inch diameter or less will completely encompass all hits/holes.
and
2) Placement which is where the center of the cirlce containing the hits falls in relation to the actual point of aim-a dot or pair of crossed lines typically, but a bull (inverted U) is sometimes employed. Placement of the pattern should be within a circle originating from the point of aim with radius of 5 inches (for a defensive/combat pistol).

Let's pause to recap: For a target 25 yard from the muzzle of a combat pistol, a two inch diameter group of 3 or more shots within 5 inches of the point of aim is indication of both sufficient pistol accuracy and adequate sight alignment (zero).

Why not align the point of aim (POA) EXACTLY to the point of impact (POI)? Simple and statistical! Unless you have means ($'s) and opportunity (availability) to acquire a very large quantity of ammunition (say 10,000 or more rounds), there is a measurable probability that the next box you do acquire will print a pattern at some other radial of the 5 inch circle--in fact, there is finite probability that that next box will print diagrammatically opposite the current box of ammo--along a radius directly opposite the first and equally far from the POA.

Chasing the elusive point of impact would involve an endless series of sight adjustments; a process that weakens and possibly damages either or both sight and gun. If you need such capability,an adjustable target sight is preferable.

Are these 2 inch and 5 inch numbers magical? No. The 2 inch group size is another statistical average. Most feel that a stock combat pistol barrel is of sufficient quality at this level or repeatability. A custom or match barrel is typically 1 inch groupings; some are even less. Occasionally a custom maker will claim a 1-1/2 inch accuracy for groups from their products.

The 5 inch number is derived mathematically from the sight adjustment formula (See the appendix of the Lyman 49th edition). Basically it's a problem of trigonometry called similar triangles. To move the point of impact 5 inches at 25 yards, a sight with 5 inches of space from post to notch must be adjusted by 1/64 of an inch. 1/64 of an inch is the smallest gradation on the standard machinists pocket ruler; i.e. the smallest movement a gunsmith can make easily with visual confirmation. One sixty-fourth of an inch is approximately 0.0156 inches, "15 thousandths".

Interestingly, the math is nicely complimented by fact on the ground. Using the same similar triangles calculation our placement circle shrinks to 2-1/2 inch radius (5 inch diameter) at 12.5 yards. It's 1-1/4 inch radius (2-1/2 inch diameter) ar 6.25 yards muzzle to target. At typical self-defense distances (arms length to 7 yards) it's almost impossible to statistically differentiate two different points of impact from combat handguns--you cannot tell which of those two boxes the round originated from.




So, for a combat gun with fixed sights, get yourself a stack of 9 or 10 inch diameter round paper plates, some colored adhesive dots 1/2 to 1 inch in diameter and a can of Coke (or other preferred soft-soda). Stick the dots on the center of a plate and attach it to a target stand 25 yards from a steady and stable shooting bench.

Carefully fire three shots at the plate from a firm rest (sandbags) on the bench using the dot as your point of aim.

Drink the soda.

If all three shots hit the plate and are grouped so the top of the soda can completely covers the holes, your gun is sufficiently accurate and the sights properly aligned for defensive purposes.
 
#7 ·
Muffled cough sounding vaguely like "Bull(droppings)"

I'd ask you to prove this and no doubt you could go into some discourse that would seem to do so and the war would be on. Instead let's look at the mathematics (and practicalities) of sight alignment. By doing that we will have some reasonable standard upon which to base a discussion instead of a flame war.

jfdavis58, relax, and re-read my post. I don't need to "prove" anything. I am merely giving personal anecdotal evidence supporting my contention that SA "may" have some quality control issues regarding their factory sight setup - a concern voiced by many posters on this forum. If a front sight that falls out of its dovetail, and a rear sight that results in groups 6" left at 7 yards doesn't constitute poor factory sight preparation, I don't know what might convince you.
 
#8 ·
SA guarantees accuracy on all factory-installed sights, they will fix it. My SC9 was hitting low, and they made it very good for such a short little beast.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top