Verm said:
Pistols are just metal mechanisms and as with all mechanisms, they can fail. I have seen a pistol go off on it's own as it was laying on the table at a range with no one near it. Found out that the hammer had a hairline crack and had just finally given way where it met the sear and bang.
Luckily the owner had set it down with the barrel pointing downrange.
WOW!!!
I guess anything is possible. This is further proof.
But as you say, with a more modern firearm it would take several simultaneous failures, which makes something like the event you described as close to impossible as can be imagined.
Nonetheless, as gets repeated (rightly), safe gun handling counts far more than gun design.
I've been called an "anti-gun" person for expressing my belief that anyone who buys a gun should be required to know the basic "commandments" of gun safety.
I think people that say being required to know anything at all infringes on their constitutional rights to own a gun are reckless and hopeless.
It does encourage me to see guys like Verm and ReloaderFred and Manygunner and plenty of others here who have obvious great perspective and in cases like Verm and Fred many years of professional experience regularly expressing their concerns with safety and responsibility.
I do get nervous at the shooting range when I see people who are perfectly within their legal rights owning and shooting their guns (some even have carry permits) with no conception of the most basic safety practices.
The number of times I have seen people turn around to talk to their companions and sweep the gun off of being down range is just plain scary. Fingers on triggers at inappropriate times....I noticed some guy changing his magazine with his finger on the trigger just the other day. And what was he shooting? An FN SeveN...why? Because he could afford it. That was his only qualification. And legally that was enough.
Peace,
D.