Joined
·
855 Posts
So i want some input on this to make sure i got my facts right cas the more i think about this the more i get mad about it.
In Washington DC it is illegal to carry guns period. There arnt any options at all. Isnt this a obvious violation of the 2nd ammentment?
I watched obama comment on this at a town hall meeting when a college student asked him about it.
He uses the same comparison each time that he has the right to free speach but you cant yell fire in a theatre. He says the govt has the right to add restrictions.
He said that we have the right to bear arms but the govt has the right to add restrictions.
This isnt similar because you do have the right to speak free but to yell fire if there is none that would be dangerous and illegal.
However if i am not a felon and i am not doing anything dangerous then i should be able to carry. I have done nothing wrong. There is no reason for a restriction.
As for washington DC i dont think the govt knows the difference between a restraint and a complete outlaw of something.
The founding fathers say that if any govt trys to infrindge on any of these rights it is up to the people to take their rights back.
Thoughts?
In Washington DC it is illegal to carry guns period. There arnt any options at all. Isnt this a obvious violation of the 2nd ammentment?
I watched obama comment on this at a town hall meeting when a college student asked him about it.
He uses the same comparison each time that he has the right to free speach but you cant yell fire in a theatre. He says the govt has the right to add restrictions.
He said that we have the right to bear arms but the govt has the right to add restrictions.
This isnt similar because you do have the right to speak free but to yell fire if there is none that would be dangerous and illegal.
However if i am not a felon and i am not doing anything dangerous then i should be able to carry. I have done nothing wrong. There is no reason for a restriction.
As for washington DC i dont think the govt knows the difference between a restraint and a complete outlaw of something.
The founding fathers say that if any govt trys to infrindge on any of these rights it is up to the people to take their rights back.
Thoughts?