Springfield XD Forum banner

1 - 17 of 17 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,116 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
New Lease on Life for the Beloved M-14


November 13, 2008
Tactical Life|by Eric R. Poole


The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have demonstrated how critically important snipers are to a fight marked by urban canyons and high-mountain caves. Problem is, those highly-trained sharpshooters are in short supply, and the need for accurate, long-range fire has outpaced the services' ability to field one-shot killers.
So both the Army and Marine Corps began a program to seed infantry squads with so-called "designated marksmen" -- call them "snipers-lite."
The growing need to equip these new marksmen with accurized rifles prompted the Army to reconsider the role of the venerable M-14 rifle for the war on terror. Back in Desert Storm, armorers from the 10th Special Forces group took M-14s equipped with a match barrels and fitted a gas piston on them for optimal performance, re-designating it the M-25. They replaced the stock with a McMillan M1A fiberglass one, developed a scope mount and added a Bausch & Lomb 10x40mm fixed-power optic or a Leupold Mark 4.
The revamped M-14 provides the Army squad designated marksman with on-command direct fire support for his squad, a fire team or his platoon. The heavier-caliber sharpshooters provide cover when machine guns displace, counter-sniper fire in urban areas, and they help in overtaking valuable real estate.
Infrared targeting lasers such as the AN/PEQ-2 and PAQ-4C make the DM's job more like 24-hour shift work. Now that suppressors for the M-14-series of rifles are available, the night-vision capabilities coupled with sound mitigation makes the Soldier's ability to own the night even more secure.
Taking the M-14 modifications a step further, Crane Division of the Naval Surface Warfare Center teamed up with Sage International to create an M-14/M1A package that is dubbed the "Enhanced Battle Rifle."
Using the M-14 barrel, receiver and trigger groups, the EBR chassis adds a retractable stock, a cheek piece that's adjustable for height and a floated Picatinny quad-rail fore-end made of high-strength aluminum. The EBR also adds a pistol grip for additional control and ergonomic sling points.
But the new rifle is heavier than the M-16 or M-4 which weighs nearly seven pounds, with each 30-round magazine adding another pound. The basic M-14, however, weighs nearly 10 pounds with an addition of almost two pounds for every 20 rounds of 7.62 the EBR fires.
A soldier's wisdom varies from one to another but many don't care about the weight. The confidence in the effective range and terminal ballistics of the M-14's 7.62mm round brings the argument back to the Vietnam-era rifle.
The EBR feels a little heavy at the fore end, but this helps the rifle address criticism that it is uncontrollable when firing on full-auto. The additional weight -- and the fact that the stock is in line and parallel with the barrel -- helps reduce muzzle climb.
The EBR chassis comes with a Picatinny rail that replaces the stripper-clip guide, helping Soldiers mount high-powered scopes that can extend the rifle's range. Unique to the EBR is an extended rail just forward of the receiver. For the followers of the Jeff Cooper doctrine on scout rifles, red dot optics work well in making this rifle an effective close quarter battle scout rifle. Regardless of scope height, the shooter can obtain proper cheek weld by adjusting the EBR's stock.
As the Army and Marines Corps continue to develop a semi-auto designated marksman rifle, many within the tactical community feel that the resurrection of the M-14 is just a stopgap. But praise from troops using the M-14's variants and moves made by the Navy suggest otherwise. In 2004, the Navy signed a contract to upgrade nearly 3,000 of their M-14s with the Sage EBR chassis.
What will remain, in any case, is the designated marksman. The smallest infantry unit includes a team leader, two riflemen and a gunner. One of these riflemen will be expected to fill the role of the designated marksman, using optics to distinguish combatants from non-combatants and minimizing collateral risk with precision fire in urban areas.
The book on small unit tactics has evolved to defeat a new kind of enemy, and the old standby Springfield Armory M-14 has evolved right along with it.
#tacLifeBox { margin: 0 -17px; padding: 0; width: 451px; height: 207px; background: #e6e6e4 url('http://images.military.com/tactical-life/images/taclife-header.jpg') top center no-repeat; position: relative;}#tacLifeBox h3 { margin: 0; padding: 0; height: 1px; margin-left: -9999px;}#tacLifeBox ul { list-style-type: square; background: url('http://images.military.com/tactical-life/images/taclife-image.jpg') left no-repeat; margin: 0 0 0 10px; position: absolute; top: 100px; padding-left: 180px;}#tacLifeBox ul li { list-style-type: square; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12px; color: #676661; padding-bottom: 6px;}#tacLifeBox ul li a { color: #0366ce;}
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,006 Posts
Heck yes dude. The M1A/M14 is a real mans rifle. Heavy... Yes. But powerful and accurate. I can't wait to finish my tacticooled AR, but if the SHTF, I'll be pulling out my Socom II.

And people criticize this rifle... HA!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,061 Posts
The military took a long time to figure out that accurate fire with a heavy bullet in combination with rapid fire from the rest of the squad is better than rapid fire from the whole squad or accurate fire from the whole squad.

The M-14 will never be as accurate as the M-24 firing match grade ammo, but it is a heck of a lot more accurate and lethal than the standard issue M-4/M-16. Even more so with a good optics package and a good rifleman behind the trigger.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,895 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,955 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,689 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,006 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
836 Posts
Like one of these? I would guess this one would be for CQC.

I loved my M-14 I had in the Army, then later we had to trade them in on the M16. The only thing I liked was they were lighter.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,116 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
I love these weapons.

 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,006 Posts
Like one of these? I would guess this one would be for CQC.

I loved my M-14 I had in the Army, then later we had to trade them in on the M16. The only thing I liked was they were lighter.
Yup, that's the one. Needs a cheek piece though for the good cheek weld. I know the AP's are parrelax free, but that is my one, and only, complaint on the M1A/M14's, Not good with scopes.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
836 Posts
We had a few GI's issued these M14A1...don't see many of these anymore.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,752 Posts
The same as the AR-10, its about time the military figired it out.
i allways wondered why they didnt use the ar-10 its a much simpler transition then learning a whole new rifle like the m14.

but either way i agree we need more soliders using the 7.62 not matter what kind of rifle
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
31,246 Posts
I'd take the M-14s simpler gas system and 7.62 bullet over the M16's complicated gas system and 223 bullet.

Gotta love a Garand with a hi-cap mag like that. Thats basically what the M-14 is.

Like the M1911...good gun designs never really leave the Corps...do they?

- brickboy240
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Top