Hehe, hopefully people will just take it as intended..just a joke.Cool ... When does the stupid argument begin![]()
Apparently it's a chart that pisses DPMS owners off!Excuse my n00byness, but what is "The Chart"?
Hey I was bored on a Sunday morning and there's a mini blizzard outside.OK, Nikon obviously found the site that lets you make your own motivational posters.![]()
Evidently you know not of what you speak. The "CHART" is where it has been.where is the real chart now.
Evidently the author of "the chart" was tossed from m4carbine.net and took the chart with him.
Strange how Colt is at the top of "The List"
Colt is at the top of the "chart" because is has the MOST milspec FEATURES.
That is what the "chart" is about......milspec features on a civilian M4 carbine.
Ok, so I was wrong but does being wrong mean you can treat me rudely?Evidently you know not of what you speak. The "CHART" is where it has been.
Comparison Chart of Major AR Brands - M4Carbine.net Forums
Well, you did call out the author out by saying he got tossed from the forum in question. So, it kind of gives the author a bad reputation by saying he got tossed from a forum ... I really don't think Mvician meant any harm by it.Ok, so I was wrong but does being wrong mean you can treat me rudely?
They can't handle the truth Mike!I'll quote the first few paragraphs from the magazine article.
"When first entering into the world of the commercial AR-15, one is struck with the plethora of offerings from a dizzying number of manufacturers. There are so many AR manufacturers and marketers today that you need a players chart just to know who's who and what's what. The sheer size of the AR bisiness leads to a logical question: If these are all M4-style rifles based on the same design, what makes one cost so much more than another?
Even for the hardcore aficionados of the black rifle, it's difficult to fully understand why one brand of AR-15 costs more than another. It begs the question: What really sets one visually identical AR apart from another?
Starting in early 2007, I embarked on an investigation to find out for myself what those differences really are and whether or not you're actually paying for enhanced quality in a higher priced gun, or, as some cynics like to say, you're simply paying for a logo.
this is from the magazine article by Rob Sloyer
"The Truth About The M4"
Read the article, and/or read the thread on m4carbine.net to see what the "chart" is about.
where is the real chart now.
Evidently the author of "the chart" was tossed from m4carbine.net and took the chart with him.
Evidently you know not of what you speak. The "CHART" is where it has been.
Comparison Chart of Major AR Brands - M4Carbine.net Forums
See the article
"The Truth About The M4"
in the printed magazine
Surefire Presents, Guns & Ammo
Combat Tactics
Ok, so I was wrong but does being wrong mean you can treat me rudely?