Joined
·
30,012 Posts
All apologies to Sir Mix-A-Lot.
I have come to the realization that the more I play with striker fired pistols...the more I don't care for them (with the obvious exception of the P7...but thats not the typical striker, either).
I came to this realization when I played with a VP9 this weekend. Didn't put rounds downrange, but had several good dry fires...and realized that if that trigger is what's considered a good one for a striker...it's just not for me.
I also played with a PPQ and a 320; I liked the PPQ's, but...I think I'd prefer the Sig; it was a bit heavier, but the metal trigger didn't have that little bit of spongy flex that plastic triggers have. Still, though...neither was as good as a decent DA/SA Sig, or even Beretta...and compared to a 1911? Fuhgeddabowdit!
I'll probably keep my M&P, but...beyond getting a VP70 somewhere down the line, I think I'm done with the striker action.
Anybody else coming to this conclusion?
I have come to the realization that the more I play with striker fired pistols...the more I don't care for them (with the obvious exception of the P7...but thats not the typical striker, either).
I came to this realization when I played with a VP9 this weekend. Didn't put rounds downrange, but had several good dry fires...and realized that if that trigger is what's considered a good one for a striker...it's just not for me.
I also played with a PPQ and a 320; I liked the PPQ's, but...I think I'd prefer the Sig; it was a bit heavier, but the metal trigger didn't have that little bit of spongy flex that plastic triggers have. Still, though...neither was as good as a decent DA/SA Sig, or even Beretta...and compared to a 1911? Fuhgeddabowdit!
I'll probably keep my M&P, but...beyond getting a VP70 somewhere down the line, I think I'm done with the striker action.
Anybody else coming to this conclusion?