How do you balance training frequency (# of times per week/month) with intensity (duration of training session/# of rounds per session)? In my opinion, frequency of training is generally more important than intensity (to an extent). In my experience as a musician and athlete, as well as coaching/teaching in those fields, skills are generally best acquired when used frequently for shorter durations as opposed to less frequently but for longer durations. If you are trying to learn to play guitar, it is far more valuable to practice for 20 minutes per day, 5 days per week than only once per week for 3 hours. I can only speak anecdotally, as I am not a psychologist but I do know there is some scientific backing to how we learn skills and the importance of frequency.
As a new gun owner and soon to be CCW'er, I plan on training quite extensively in order to be a master of my weapon. As we all know, it can be a bit cost prohibitive. If we assume ammo is a "fixed cost", in that we are considering a fixed amount of ammo per week (say 200 rds), then the range fee is the variable cost. I could shoot all 800 rounds in one day a month, paying one range fee per month, or I could shoot 200/ week and have 4 range fees per month, or shoot 4 times per week and have 16 range fees per month. Personally, I would much rather shoot 4 times per week and shoot only 50 rounds per session as I feel the frequency would really help me master a surprise break, front sight focus, and presenting- all very basic things that I need work on. However, that's a lot of money in range fees. If I lived in the sticks and could shoot in my backyard, this is absolutely the route I'd go, but I live in a big city, so range fees are my only choice.
So my question to you is, where do you see the optimal balance between frequency and intensity and cost, if we assume a fixed number of rounds will be fired regardless? Any creative ways (besides dry fire) to mitigate range fees?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
As a new gun owner and soon to be CCW'er, I plan on training quite extensively in order to be a master of my weapon. As we all know, it can be a bit cost prohibitive. If we assume ammo is a "fixed cost", in that we are considering a fixed amount of ammo per week (say 200 rds), then the range fee is the variable cost. I could shoot all 800 rounds in one day a month, paying one range fee per month, or I could shoot 200/ week and have 4 range fees per month, or shoot 4 times per week and have 16 range fees per month. Personally, I would much rather shoot 4 times per week and shoot only 50 rounds per session as I feel the frequency would really help me master a surprise break, front sight focus, and presenting- all very basic things that I need work on. However, that's a lot of money in range fees. If I lived in the sticks and could shoot in my backyard, this is absolutely the route I'd go, but I live in a big city, so range fees are my only choice.
So my question to you is, where do you see the optimal balance between frequency and intensity and cost, if we assume a fixed number of rounds will be fired regardless? Any creative ways (besides dry fire) to mitigate range fees?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk