Kahr CW9 Vs XD9SC??

Discussion in 'Non-XD Handguns' started by Boostedxt, Sep 12, 2010.

  1. Sep 12, 2010 #1
    Boostedxt

    Boostedxt XDTalk 100 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0
    I currently have a XD9SC that I have been carrying however I have been thinking of picking up the Cw9 just because they can be had for $399 locally here. I am thinking of getting it because its narrower than the XD. Thoughts? Anyone have one? Its the same dimensions as the PM9 and P9.

    I compared them at the shop and it was a big difference for feel and width...but i want your opinion.:)

    I carry in an MTAC btw.

    joe

     
  2. Sep 12, 2010 #2
    HokieMS2.0

    HokieMS2.0 XDTalk Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    I've got the CW9. It's my carry gun. It's thin and light, and carries well. The trigger is looonnng, but very smooth, and not extremely heavy. I've never had any problems out of mine, with random FMJ's and Federal Hydrashocks (probably 400 rounds total). Good accuracy, also. If you like the feel, I say go for it.
     
  3. Sep 12, 2010 #3
    Boostedxt

    Boostedxt XDTalk 100 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0
    can you post some photos of it? Do you still have an XD? can you post comparison pictures. Thanks for the info!!!

    joe
     
  4. Sep 15, 2010 #4
    rexracer

    rexracer XDTalk 100 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2008
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Western CT
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    I have a PM9 and a friend has a P9. They both shoot well, and I've seen him carry the P9 where I was looking to see if he was carrying, and asked him why he wasn't...up came the shirt and there it was. I say go for it.
     
  5. Sep 15, 2010 #5
    Mudinyeri

    Mudinyeri XDTalk 2K Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2,524
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    I have a CW40 and an XD40 SC. The comparison would be similar to a comparison between the CW9 and XD9 SC. I don't have any comparison shots of the two guns but I do have a comparison shot of my CW40 and PM9. The CW model is bigger. It's really not a good pocket gun, IMO, if that's what you're looking for.

    CW on the left ...
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    PM on top ...
    [​IMG]

    PM on bottom ...
    [​IMG]
     
  6. Sep 15, 2010 #6
    Boostedxt

    Boostedxt XDTalk 100 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0
    thanks for the pictures! I will be carrying this IWB as I am not 100% comfy with pocket carry honestly. I would assume the CW9 would be a good IWB tshirt ad shorts gun?
     
  7. Sep 15, 2010 #7
    Mudinyeri

    Mudinyeri XDTalk 2K Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2,524
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Yes, I carry my CW in a CBST holster and it even conceals fairly well wearing tighter, lighter-weight shirts like Under Armor Heat Gear and Columbia's Titanium shirts. I don't wear the body-hugger shirts but the light-weight fabric still drapes pretty closely and even my wife, who knows I carry pretty much all the time, has noted that she couldn't tell.

    The PM9 is nice for pocket carry when you can't wear a holster for one reason or another. I have a nice pocket holster that makes it look like I'm carrying my wallet in my front pocket (in tighter shorts/pants).
     
  8. Sep 15, 2010 #8
    MPDC

    MPDC XDTalk 500 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Messages:
    838
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    SW Florida
    Ratings:
    +16 / 0
    Well, since the original question was vs. XDSC, I have to add that while convenience is definitely served with the Kahr, there IS a tradeoff. To some it will be a major one, to others , less so.

    Weight and width make the SA XDSC platform feel and shoot like a much larger weapon. It has less perceived recoil, less prone to failures from grip problems, faster back on target after a shot and can carry at least 13 rounds meaning a second mag is optional rather than necessary.

    All things are a trade off. The XDSC is the most concealable XD. The Kahrs and Kel Tecs are the most convenient to conceal and carry in 9MM. Your choice comes down to comfort in carry or comfort in shooting, IMHO. Either will be servicable for CCW but your choice should depend on which variable is more important to you. I chose the XD over my PF9 because of reliability and shooting ergonomics. I do miss the easily concealable , thin and light little pocket cannon. I , however, shoot the XD much better and have much more confidence in the performance of it as well as the ammo capacity.
     
  9. Sep 15, 2010 #9
    RobzXD

    RobzXD XDTalk 3K Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,507
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Wherever the RV Stops
    Ratings:
    +32 / 0
    Here's a link comparing the 3 Kahrs you mentioned
    Genitron.com: Comparing 3 Guns|CW9|P9|PM9|

    You might want to consider the Ruger SR9c. We just picked one up in Bi-Tone for $400 + Tax, so it's in the same price range as the Cw9. Like the Cw9, it's slimmer and a bit more rounded/comfortable than the XD9sc, but still a Double Stack with 10rd & 17rd mags. The really strange thing about the SR9c is that it's a couple ounces Heavier than the XD9sc, but it really doesn't FEEL heavier. The SR9c 17rd mag seems to not add as much girth to the Ruger as the XD's 16rd mag. Not sure why...

    Here's the same site, but comparing the Cw9, XD9sc and SR9c:
    Genitron.com: Comparing 3 Guns|CW9|XD Sub Compact|SR9c|

    Here's another good comparison chart, but it doesn't have the SR9c listed yet.
    http://www.mouseguns.com/CompactCompare.pdf
     
  10. Sep 15, 2010 #10
    Mudinyeri

    Mudinyeri XDTalk 2K Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2,524
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    I'd like to address a couple of the statements above.

    1. I don't carry a spare magazine just for capacity. I carry one, primarily, because most semi-auto handgun failures are in some way related to the magazine and/or resolved by dropping the current magazine and replacing it with a new one. I know that I share this opinion with countless seasoned LEO's, military and civilian handgun carriers.

    2. Ergonomics are 100% based upon the individual shooting the gun.

    3. Accuracy, is generally more a factor of practice than ergonomics. A few weeks ago, I watched a guy shoot the Q out of a Q Target shooting a CW9 from a variety of ranges. I MIGHT be able to do that with one of my XD's ... or Kahrs ... or other brands of handguns ... but it definitely proved to me that the CW series are accurate handguns in the right hands.

    If you've had reliability issues with your Kahr I certainly understand a hesitance to carry it. Other than that, like most gun purchases, it comes down to the individual making the purchase. We can all agree or disagree as much as we want but, ultimately, the OP has to make his own decision.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
cw9 reliability
,
cw9 vs xd9sc
,
cw9 vs xds
,
is kahr cw9 reliable
,

kahr cw9 reliability

,
kahr cw9 vs pm9
,
kahr cw9 vs springfield xds 9 subcompact
,
kahr cw9 vs sr9c
,

kahr cw9 vs xd9sc

,
kahr cw9 vs xds 9
,
reliability of kahr cw9
,
springfield xd 9 vs kahr cw9
,
springfield xd subcompact vs kahr cw9
,
xd9sc
,
xd9sc vs kahr