Does the 223 tumble and fragment like the 5.56 round?

Discussion in 'The Ammo Can' started by Magog, Jan 14, 2012.

  1. Jan 14, 2012 #1
    Magog

    Magog XDTalk 100 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    People say they are the same...


    But I can find no data on the 223 tumbling and fragmenting.


    They do move at the same rate of speed...

    The Hyperstactic shock alone has been proven to kill animals when the bullet hits the soft watery body and forces all that blood into the skull. If the animal does not die it suffers massive brain damage and is impaired.


    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZjKI7jt2gQ]223 stopping power demonstration - YouTube[/ame]


    this is the best vid I have seen on 223 damage. It left a huge exit wound and I am happy with my choice in 223.
     
  2. Jan 14, 2012 #2
    Rob2

    Rob2 XDTalk 1K Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1,312
    Likes Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Louisiana
    Ratings:
    +157 / 4
    They ae the same. The difference is in tolerances for chambering really from what i gather, .223 has a lower tolerance on casing size and the 5.56 chambering not as tight a tolerance because its generaly in combat type guns vs being in precision guns like .223

    I personaly agree with people also in saying the 5.56 is a hotter round as i can tell when i shoot 5.56 out of my ar it kicks a tiny bit more than when i shoot rounds labeled .223

    So to be safe, stick with .223 with a gun marked .223 but if its marked 5.56 it doesnt matter


    Edit: also keep in mind, in general 5.56 is usually a fmj and .223 especialy varmit and hunting loads are some form of hollow point or balistic tip(which is kinda the same as a hp). And that can be the tumbling u hear about in 5.56 vs a hp in .223 its not really cause the round is so different as much as one is usually a hp and other usually a fmj
     
  3. Jan 14, 2012 #3
    Bluto

    Bluto XDTalk 2K Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,676
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
  4. Jan 14, 2012 #4
    Cuda66

    Cuda66 XDTalk 15K Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    19,230
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kandiyohi County, MN--land of fields and lakes.
    Ratings:
    +6,841 / 197
    Actually, it's hydrostatic shock, and it hasn't been proven to do anything.
     
  5. Jan 15, 2012 #5
    cz75luver

    cz75luver XDTalk 3K Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,972
    Likes Received:
    156
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +554 / 71
    Actually, scientific/medical evidence/history has proven it to be quite damaging. It has been proven to fracture bones, destroy organs, cause brain hemorraging, etc. Just depends on the projectile characteristics (size, speed, energy, motion through medium, etc.) and where it hits/travels. Organs that are more liquid filled will experience greater damage than more dense organs if the projectile characteristics are enough to cause the damage. What seems to a common rule of thumb is that a projectile must at least have 500 ft-lb of force.
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2012
  6. Jan 15, 2012 #6
    Cuda66

    Cuda66 XDTalk 15K Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    19,230
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kandiyohi County, MN--land of fields and lakes.
    Ratings:
    +6,841 / 197
    You're confusing temporary cavity and hydrostatic shock.

    And it has nothing to do with energy; it's more a function of velocity.
     
  7. Jan 15, 2012 #7
    cz75luver

    cz75luver XDTalk 3K Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,972
    Likes Received:
    156
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +554 / 71
  8. Jan 15, 2012 #8
    cz75luver

    cz75luver XDTalk 3K Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,972
    Likes Received:
    156
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +554 / 71
    The PhDs I linked above would disagree. BTW, velocity with no mass has no direct physical effect. You're body is constantly struck by particles with negligible mass travelling at a high velocity (i.e. - radiation) but you don't feel them. Energy and/or force is what a person would typically feel. When it comes to penetrating trauma in the form of a bullet, kinetic energy (Ke = (1/2)mv^2) needs to be considered.

    You're confusing temporary cavity with hydrostatic shock as I never related the two. They are different. The amount of temporary cavity that remains as a permanent cavity is related to the elasticity of the tissue. A classic example is the swinging of a bat. Swing a bat at a garbage can results in a dent or cavity. Do the same to foam and the foam will bounce back. Do it to the abdomen of a person and the body will spring back, but depending on the force of the impact, location, etc., there can be internal damage to include bone fractures, hemorraging, etc. Bullets, though, are a form of penetrating trauma rather than blunt trauma. I'd refer to the effects of bullets to the PhD's.
     
  9. Jan 15, 2012 #9
    Cuda66

    Cuda66 XDTalk 15K Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    19,230
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kandiyohi County, MN--land of fields and lakes.
    Ratings:
    +6,841 / 197
    Courtney's been debunked. for cryin' out loud, he still thinks the fabricated "Strasbourg Tests" are valid...

    And Wikipedia isn't a very reliable source.

    Temp cavity is the result of tissue being stretched by a high-velocity bullet's passage--the same pressure waves you'll see in air. It can damage organs, break bones, etc...if the bullet is moving fast enough. Take a real heavy, slow-moving bullet...there is minimal temp cavity, regardless of it's energy.

    Hydrostatic shock is the mythical buildup of magical pressure waves in the blood that "shock" the brain into shutting down...
     
  10. Jan 15, 2012 #10
    cz75luver

    cz75luver XDTalk 3K Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,972
    Likes Received:
    156
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +554 / 71
    For the OP, this might be what you're looking for:

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2m2vaJCBQTs]223REM Federal 55gr Triple-Shock in 20% gelatin - YouTube[/ame]
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
.223 ammo tissue damage
,
.223 frag round
,
.223 round tumbling
,
.223 fragmentation velocity
,
.223 characteristics
,
223 tumble myth or fact
,

do .223 rounds tumble

,
does .223 fragment like 5.56
,
does a .223 fragment
,

does a .223 round tumble

,
does a 223 tumble
,
does the .223 round tumble
,
what does a 223 bullet do to the body
,
what does the 223 round do to humans
,
what kind of damage does a .223 do