"The Political View" Sub-Forum Re-Opened!

[xdgunner9mm]

Originally Posted by rube

Great!!! I am happy that XD Forum finally has come to their senses. All XD did was provide a venue for racist members to hide behind the veneer of being a gun owner while expressing their disgusting prejudices. Personally I was about to leave XD Forum because of the far right red neck hatred being posted. I simply joined this forum as a V-vet with an interest in fire arms. Religion and politics should both be banned from this forum. I imagine there are more than enough forums for the before mentioned people to spread their poison.

You sound like you would enjoy living in Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia. They simply banned religious and political speech they didn't like everywhere.

1st Ammendment - try reading it. And I've never seen one comment like those you describe.

[Son of Erin, Infidel]

Originally Posted by Son of Erin, Infidel

.....now I am seeing the "you do not have permission to post in this thread" message.......can you fix this for me please? thanks

never mind.......fixed it meself......guess in future I should try reading the destructions all the way through first.......this one's on me.....

[Son of Erin, Infidel]

Originally Posted by rogerxd45

how come i cant see your "if you there are no post in this forum" thread?
when i click on the PV forum it does say no posts

it's the ingredients for the XD-Talk Forum.......what did I win???

[Wrangler]

It seems like all the racists are Hillary supporters? Do you believe Obama didn't know the character or the heart of his pastor or did he find spiritual guidance from a like minded soul? Funny but I think 20 years of association speaks for itself.

Cactus John may not be my favorite candidate but he beats the other two hands down. He definately has character and I don't need to be a racist to think so.

[AZXD]

Originally Posted by Son of Erin, Infidel

thanks for re-establishing the thread Kerm, however I have a question........what exactly constitutes a political post?.....so I don't post something in another thread that is verboten.....thanks in advance

That's a question I have wondered about in the past. But wonder even more about now. IMO many of the chatterbox threads of the past few days probably should be in the PV section. I guess if a candidates name is in it, it's PV. Beyond that ... Who knows

I always figured that 2A was a chatterbox item and American Idol was a chatterbox item, but some of this stuff ... No clue.

[Etta Place]

Originally Posted by AZXD

That's a question I have wondered about in the past. But wonder even more about now. IMO many of the chatterbox threads of the past few days probably should be in the PV section. I guess if a candidates name is in it, it's PV. Beyond that ... Who knows

I always figured that 2A was a chatterbox item and American Idol was a chatterbox item, but some of this stuff ... No clue.

Right. I think anything relating to the economy is political. And, I think military-oriented discussions often veer into political ones. I think the current China thread in Chatter Box is an example.

[justgotback]

Originally Posted by Etta Place

Right. I think anything relating to the economy is political. And, I think military-oriented discussions often veer into political ones. I think the current China thread in Chatter Box is an example.

I think anything that Etta post is political!!!!

[Edubya]

I'm not crazy about the idea of McCain as a president, but I read a comparison on the original page and tried to submit this.

D.C.'s Gun Ban Gets Day in Court
The city received an unlikely lifeline from the Bush administration, which told the court that the amendment provides an individual right but that the appeals court erred in deciding that the District's ban was automatically unconstitutional.
[...]

Gun rights supporters were furious about the government's position, and Vice President Cheney went so far as to join a friend-of-the-court brief that specifically rejects the administration's view. Levy said returning the case to lower courts would be a "death knell," and his team has urged the court to apply "strict scrutiny" to any government action that would restrict gun ownership.
[..]

Among the presidential candidates, Republican Sen. John McCain signed on, while Democratic Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton did not. Both Democrats have looked for a middle ground, saying they believe the Second Amendment preserves an individual right, but one that is subject to government restrictions.
D.C.'s Gun Ban Gets Day in Court

[Etta Place]

Originally Posted by Edubya

I'm not crazy about the idea of McCain as a president, but I read a comparison on the original page and tried to submit this.

D.C.'s Gun Ban Gets Day in Court
The city received an unlikely lifeline from the Bush administration, which told the court that the amendment provides an individual right but that the appeals court erred in deciding that the District's ban was automatically unconstitutional.
[...]

Gun rights supporters were furious about the government's position, and Vice President Cheney went so far as to join a friend-of-the-court brief that specifically rejects the administration's view. Levy said returning the case to lower courts would be a "death knell," and his team has urged the court to apply "strict scrutiny" to any government action that would restrict gun ownership.
[..]

Among the presidential candidates, Republican Sen. John McCain signed on, while Democratic Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton did not. Both Democrats have looked for a middle ground, saying they believe the Second Amendment preserves an individual right, but one that is subject to government restrictions.
D.C.'s Gun Ban Gets Day in Court

Join us in the political forum - down a few from Chatter Box

[Etta Place]

Originally Posted by justgotback

I think anything that Etta post is political!!!!

Hey, I post stuff in the Non-XD thread. I'm into looking at guns and discussing what to get, which ones are best, etc.

But, politics is my thing.