XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
 

Go Back   XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! > Main Room > XDTalk Chatter Box
Register Forum Rules Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
XDTalk Memberships Gold Sponsorships XDTalk Sponsors XDTalk Pro Logo Shop Photo Gallery Wiki ChatBox


Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

*** Registration also removes the In-Text Advertising when viewing threads on XDTalk! ***

Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2007, 08:45 PM   #21
XDTalk 1K Member
 
MGD 45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Perry
Posts: 1,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuppicide View Post
What? The Police are ALWAYS truthful! You must be a LYING COP HATER!

........."Oh wait" Says Yuppicide as he does a quick internet search on falsified police reports:

DALLAS — Two Texas police officers frequently made homeless people and prostitutes sign blank tickets so they could later fill them out with whatever offenses they chose, according to a Dallas Police Department investigation.
Dallas Police Chief David Kunkle said investigators concluded the two officers used the blank tickets as a law-enforcement tool against habitual offenders. If those offenders always had unpaid tickets, then officers could obtain arrest warrants and take people into custody at any time, Kunkle said.
"It's hard for me to understand any circumstances where that would be appropriate," Kunkle told The Dallas Morning News. "It certainly violates fundamental fairness if people don't have the opportunity to know what they're being charged with or get proper notification."


FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. -- A sheriff's detective was fired after being charged with falsifying documents in police reports.
He is the third official charged in the state attorney's 17-month probe into allegations that Broward County sheriff's deputies closed cases by attributing them to people who could not have committed the crimes.
Joe Isabella, 34, was fired Thursday after he told investigators he had improperly cleared cases and falsified reports. He was charged with a misdemeanor count of falsifying documents and is scheduled to be arraigned on Monday.

He blamed pressure from supervisors who wanted to lower crime statistics.


A former Pittsburg police officer was sentenced Thursday to 180 days in jail and three years probation for five counts of falsifying police reports.
Jim Hartley, 41, pled no contest to the charges and Contra Costa Superior Court Judge Diana Becton Smith handed down the agreed upon sentence in court Thursday. Hartley has until October 22 to report to jail, or he can request electronic home detention for the duration of his sentence.
A prosecutor noticed some similarities in two of Hartley's police reports earlier this year. That led to a full investigation by the Pittsburg Police Department and the discovery of 39 remarkably similar drug arrest reports, court records show.
Hartley and his attorney reached a deal with the district attorney's office to plea no contest to five charges and accept the six month sentence.
He will not be able to work as a police officer again, a prosecutor said. The investigation also revealed similar inaccuracies in the reporting of fellow Officer Javier Salgado who was also charged with five counts of falsifying police reports and awaits sentencing.

........Need More, cause theres PLENTY!!
Yeah....well......, all the press and the attorney's and the DA's....are lying about this. No cop has ever lied...not once....not ever....doesn't happen (head burried in sand here...).
__________________
" Don't sweat the small stuff...& it's all small stuff. "
MGD 45 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:11 PM   #22
XDTalk 1K Member
 
The Tengu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,813
Send a message via AIM to The Tengu
Have I cuffed a CHL holder just because they have a gun? No, I'm generally not worried about them attacking me. I have secured their guns in my car before though, just to keep them separate from their guns when the situation dictates.

Have I ever cuffed someone just for my safety without an arrest? Yeah, I have.

I've never done it to a CHL holder, but I have done it while detaining people. Some of them I let go, some of them I actually arrested. Just because someone is cuffed, it does not mean that they are necessarily under arrest.

Sure, it's kind of rude but like I was telling my partner today: I'd rather hurt someone's feelings then end up dead. I don't do these things to be a dick.
__________________
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
United States Code, Title 10, section 311, paragraph (a)
The Tengu is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:22 PM   #23
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Mad Geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Yosemite
Posts: 1,065
+1 Jd
__________________
Chuck

NRA Patron Life Member
US Concealed Carry Association
Founding Life Member:
Society Of The Honor Guard, Tomb Of The Unknown Soldier
Senior Member
CalCCW - Helping Californians Legally Obtain A Concealed Carry License

"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life." Robert A. Heinlein
Mad Geek is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:43 PM   #24
XDTalk Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 38
Send a message via MSN to Thesparkens
Im in Colorado. Does most states computer systems (when up and running) IE. NCIC, CCIC show that you are a permit holder?
__________________
Thank's Paul

XD40 SC
XD40 Service
Beretta M9 .40cal
Glock G22
S&W M&P15 AR15
Thesparkens is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:51 PM   #25
XDTalk 100 Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 280
Quote:
Originally Posted by MGD 45 View Post
Spoken like a true "I've been arrested before" person....
Nope...just someone who realizes that both sides have a natural tendency to think they are right...and that the cops have more ability to CYA in the situation.
TobyU is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 11:20 PM   #26
XDTalk 100 Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerxd45 View Post
the other time i had my 45 sitting on the dash of my car and i got pulled over and i asked if i could get out of the car or have him take the gun out so there wouldnt be any mistakes well he aked if it was ok if he put me in cuffs and i said yea thats fine and he cuffed me and i sat on the hood of his car. it didnt bother me one bit. what ever they need to do to make it safer for them and the people they are pulling over is fine with me
I have to say that this bothers me more than just about anything I've read on this board.

You couldn't have been more open and compliant and this guy's first option was to cuff you?!?! And worse yet, you're OK with this?!?! Where is the dignity? The only reasons for him to do this to an obviously helpful and compliant citizen is that he is either a chiken-s*** or a bully.

I usually think its BS when I hear of an LEO taking control of the weapon "for your and my safety"... although I'd comply.

I'm all for safety, but this ridiculous. I was pulled over and got a ticket last week. We didn't become buddies but he was capable and professional.

If they say they're gonna cuff you, they're gonna cuff you. but "is it ok if I cuff you?". "I'd prefer it if you didn't."

I'm no cop basher, but ....Geez! I'd like to keep a little dignity, if you don't mind.
HumbleGuy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 11:45 PM   #27
XDTalk 1K Member
 
The Tengu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,813
Send a message via AIM to The Tengu
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thesparkens View Post
Im in Colorado. Does most states computer systems (when up and running) IE. NCIC, CCIC show that you are a permit holder?
In our system it only shows up when we run their driver license.
__________________
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
United States Code, Title 10, section 311, paragraph (a)
The Tengu is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 01:11 AM   #28
XDTalk 1K Member
 
ElJimmyStrappo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SE Idaho
Posts: 1,320
That is totally unconstitutional. You can't restrict someone's freedom of movement (ie: arrest) them unless you have probable cause that a crime has been committed.

Now the officer can ask a violator to step out of the car and frisk them for weapons as an officer safety thing but that also has to be articulable.

If that were happening I would be very surprised.
__________________
The Carry: Springfield XD 9 Service - Crossbreed Supertuck & DGR with #16 and #22 springs.
The Tack Driver: Sako Vixen L461 .222 Rifle with Bushnell 4X Scope A real tack driver!
The Fun Gun: Marlin .22 LR with Bushnell 7X Scope
The best weapon anyone can have: a brain.

"The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." -John Steinbeck

"Beware the man who owns just one gun, he will know how to use it."
ElJimmyStrappo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 01:25 AM   #29
XDTalk 15K Member
 
AZXD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Valley of the GUN
Posts: 16,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tengu View Post
Have I cuffed a CHL holder just because they have a gun? No, I'm generally not worried about them attacking me. I have secured their guns in my car before though, just to keep them separate from their guns when the situation dictates.

Have I ever cuffed someone just for my safety without an arrest? Yeah, I have.

I've never done it to a CHL holder, but I have done it while detaining people. Some of them I let go, some of them I actually arrested. Just because someone is cuffed, it does not mean that they are necessarily under arrest.

Sure, it's kind of rude but like I was telling my partner today: I'd rather hurt someone's feelings then end up dead. I don't do these things to be a dick.
I'd rather put you (or any LEO) at easy than have us both make a mistake. If I do something questionable, I'd have no problem being cuffed to ease your concerns over the safety of both of us while the situation is checked out. I am not a criminal, so if that's what it takes to ensure we both have a pleasant evening, I don't have a problem with securing the situation.

But I would be very concerned for my life if I were pulled over, asked to step out of the car and cuffed for no reason.
__________________
.
.
Prepare for the worst scenario and hope for the best!!!
Ignorance is curable, but stupidity is fatal.
When one is prepared, it gives them peace of mind and eliminates the panic button which often leads to unnecessary waste and tragedy.

The so-called "reasonable gun control" measures will take us all to the day when the last single-shot shotgun that grandpa owned is cut into pieces.

Last edited by AZXD; 12-18-2007 at 01:31 AM.
AZXD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 01:28 AM   #30
XDTalk 1K Member
 
trik396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: currently elsewhere
Posts: 1,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by HumbleGuy View Post
I have to say that this bothers me more than just about anything I've read on this board.

You couldn't have been more open and compliant and this guy's first option was to cuff you?!?! And worse yet, you're OK with this?!?! Where is the dignity? The only reasons for him to do this to an obviously helpful and compliant citizen is that he is either a chiken-s*** or a bully.

I usually think its BS when I hear of an LEO taking control of the weapon "for your and my safety"... although I'd comply.

I'm all for safety, but this ridiculous. I was pulled over and got a ticket last week. We didn't become buddies but he was capable and professional.

If they say they're gonna cuff you, they're gonna cuff you. but "is it ok if I cuff you?". "I'd prefer it if you didn't."

I'm no cop basher, but ....Geez! I'd like to keep a little dignity, if you don't mind.
I was going to type something exactly like this.... Cuffing someone for no reason? Try me... and then I guess we'll have a reason. And for all you LEO's out there who disagree with me, how would you feel if it were your wife getting cuffed on the side of the road, for no f'ing reason. Give me a break.
__________________
‘‘When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans ...... And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it.’’
— Bill Clinton, 3-22-94
trik396 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:10 PM.


 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

XDTalk is a subsidiary of the Kao Holdings Group
Maintained by Kao Solutions, a subsidiary of the Kao Holdings Group