(PV) A Rocky Rollout For Thompson - Page 3 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!

justgotback · 09-14-2007, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prometheus

An admitted warmonger will NOT win in 2008. I say admitted because hitlery is one too, she doesn't say it... she only votes that way.

Anyone advocating nation building and needless squander of lives and money in 2008 is toast... including thompson.

Ron Paul is the ONLY canidate running who can SCHOOL any of the democrats over the iraq war issue and hold their feet to the fire on their voting record.

Want a republican in 2008? You have to support Paul. He is the only chance republicans have at winning the general election.

Are you freaking kidding me? Man, why don't you Ron Paul supporters just calling him Jesus. Sounds like he may be your messiah!!

**PackerfanXD** · 09-14-2007, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dhunter55

Ah, you forgot one. If you want more illegals in our country McCain is your candidate!

I think he knows he F'ed up on that one. I still think he is a good republican at heart.

Dhunter55 · 09-14-2007, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PackerfanXD

I think he knows he F'ed up on that one. I still think he is a good republican at heart.

I gotta have some space in my heart for him. He's Navy.

cucamelsmd15 · 09-14-2007, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justgotback

Can you guys post ANYTHING positive about ANYONE other than Paul?

Are there actually any positive candidates in this race?

**eric_t12** · 09-15-2007, 03:21 AM

Quote:

Man, why don't you Ron Paul supporters just calling him Jesus.

dont know what to say to that...

which says just as much as your post did.

jkswiss · 09-15-2007, 04:05 AM

Ron Paul has his faults, its just that his foreign policy is so refreshing that it overshadows them.

This being a gun forum with a more right wing crowd so you may not be against this but he pro life and is one of those people who would like to see Roe vs. Wade overturned.

Ron Paul doesn't really have a solution for health care. I think it was no government involvement, status quo sort of thing. I personally believe the health care system needs some kind of overhaul. As a healthy 25 year old, I'm paying ridiculous amounts of money for health and dental as a student.

He doesn't believe in the notion of seperation of church and state, a stance I find fairly dangerous.

He doesn't support federal funding of student loans, which as a student, is a pretty big deal. No Stafford loans would be a huge burden on some students. I know many people who borrowed their way to college and this might be a step backward.

He doesn't believe that the government should be involved in education. Some might view this as good, some might view this as bad. Individual counties and municipalities would be responsible for their own education. This might be well and all if your in a fairly well off neighborhood but if you happen to live on the wrong side of the tracks, your SOL. However, government mandated No Child Left Behind has a lot to be desired so whether this is a good or bad thing..not so sure.

Ron Paul isn't perfect but I still think he is one of the better choices.

invssgt · 09-15-2007, 07:05 AM

I'm gonna keep saying this, whether anybody listens or not

Frankly it seems counterproductive to invest a lot of time, emotion or energy arguing presidential candidates before the primary. The issue will be decided in the various states and then each party will form a ticket, which they think can win. Sometimes I think these committees making that decision are staffed by heavy crack-smokers, given the candidates and running mates they offer the voting public. Of course we are supposed to be stupid and swayed by party affiliation, so they think we will vote for Pluto and Daffy as long as they are blessed by the party with which we are generally affiliated.

So take a deep breath, and don't get excited yet. There are lots of lies waiting to be told by and about candidates, as they exist at present. Once the party selections are made, take a hard look at what each side offers based on your priorities.

That's what I'm going to do. Nobody is going to get my vote unless I am truly convinced that they are not going to screw our brains out on 2A issues. I am sick of voting for the 'lesser of two evils'.

And I'm not at all above writing in "Pluto and Daffy" if both sides manage to piss me off enough.

justgotback · 09-15-2007, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eric_t12

dont know what to say to that...

which says just as much as your post did.

You may need to study it a bit more to understand, then again, you may not be at that level yet............

Dhunter55 · 09-15-2007, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justgotback

Sounds like he may be your messiah!!

Nope, he's just a Prophet.

justgotback · 09-15-2007, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dhunter55

Nope, he's just a Prophet.

Soooo, he's a Mormon.............

09-15-2007, 07:05 AM	#27
invssgt XDTalk 1K Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Missouri Posts: 1,376	I'm gonna keep saying this, whether anybody listens or not Frankly it seems counterproductive to invest a lot of time, emotion or energy arguing presidential candidates before the primary. The issue will be decided in the various states and then each party will form a ticket, which they think can win. Sometimes I think these committees making that decision are staffed by heavy crack-smokers, given the candidates and running mates they offer the voting public. Of course we are supposed to be stupid and swayed by party affiliation, so they think we will vote for Pluto and Daffy as long as they are blessed by the party with which we are generally affiliated. So take a deep breath, and don't get excited yet. There are lots of lies waiting to be told by and about candidates, as they exist at present. Once the party selections are made, take a hard look at what each side offers based on your priorities. That's what I'm going to do. Nobody is going to get my vote unless I am truly convinced that they are not going to screw our brains out on 2A issues. I am sick of voting for the 'lesser of two evils'. And I'm not at all above writing in "Pluto and Daffy" if both sides manage to piss me off enough. __________________ It ain't personal. Nothing contained herein is intended is to offend the immature, retarded, hyper-sensitive, emotionally/hormonally unstable, or otherwise easily-offended. But if it does- don't cry to me. I don't care. "Sarge" www.thesixgunjournal.net http://sargesrollcall.blogspot.com/ LOCK & LOAD the VOTE!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-15-2007, 04:05 AM	#26
jkswiss XDTalk 1K Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,085	Ron Paul has his faults, its just that his foreign policy is so refreshing that it overshadows them. This being a gun forum with a more right wing crowd so you may not be against this but he pro life and is one of those people who would like to see Roe vs. Wade overturned. Ron Paul doesn't really have a solution for health care. I think it was no government involvement, status quo sort of thing. I personally believe the health care system needs some kind of overhaul. As a healthy 25 year old, I'm paying ridiculous amounts of money for health and dental as a student. He doesn't believe in the notion of seperation of church and state, a stance I find fairly dangerous. He doesn't support federal funding of student loans, which as a student, is a pretty big deal. No Stafford loans would be a huge burden on some students. I know many people who borrowed their way to college and this might be a step backward. He doesn't believe that the government should be involved in education. Some might view this as good, some might view this as bad. Individual counties and municipalities would be responsible for their own education. This might be well and all if your in a fairly well off neighborhood but if you happen to live on the wrong side of the tracks, your SOL. However, government mandated No Child Left Behind has a lot to be desired so whether this is a good or bad thing..not so sure. Ron Paul isn't perfect but I still think he is one of the better choices.