More evidence... Jihad not about Policy, but religion. (PV_)

[rucker]

So if they just want to install Sharia everywhere why don't they choose targets where that would be more easily accomplished? Why do they choose the US and Britain?

If what that article says is true then wouldn't places like China or India be more fruitful?

edit: I just realized I have two different points in there. 1) ease of achieving goals, and 2) results of achieving goals. Smaller nations would be easier, and 1 billion people would be more productive than 300 million.

[AZXD]

Originally Posted by Frenchy

Throwin' that word around pretty loosely, arn'cha!

Well, he's always right

[Judge]

it was a joke people..

lighten up. Read the comment I was referring to -- "token liberal".. 'token' = get it - token???? Dope smoking?

Originally Posted by AZXD

More words of wisdom?

[Judge]

Hmmm... I bet if you really, really try, and spend, oh, 10 seconds thinking about this, after you read the article...

You can figure it out.

Really, it's in the article.

I wouldn't kid you.

Originally Posted by rucker

So if they just want to install Sharia everywhere why don't they choose targets where that would be more easily accomplished? Why do they choose the US and Britain?

If what that article says is true then wouldn't places like China or India be more fruitful?

edit: I just realized I have two different points in there. 1) ease of achieving goals, and 2) results of achieving goals. Smaller nations would be easier, and 1 billion people would be more productive than 300 million.

[Dhunter55]

Originally Posted by Judge

We got a bunch of Paul supporters on here.

Wait a minute, I'll introduce ya'll...

Hi, my name is Dhunter and I'm a Ronaholic.

[rucker]

Originally Posted by Judge

Hmmm... I bet if you really, really try, and spend, oh, 10 seconds thinking about this, after you read the article...

You can figure it out.

Really, it's in the article.

I wouldn't kid you.

I have been lurking the forums for awhile and know you like to resort to empty replies such as this but please, I am just too dense, can you please point it out to me?

Is it this?

For my generation, we were born here, raised here, schooled here, we work here and we'll stay here.

[Dhunter55]

meanwhile back at the Inquisition...........

Queen Isabella: It's Spanish policy!

Pope Sixtus IV: No! It's church policy!

Torquemada: Ok, It's Spain's Holy policy.

[Judge]

Not sure I understand, but here are quotes from the article cited:



And though many British extremists are angered by the deaths of fellow Muslim across the world, what drove me and many others to plot acts of extreme terror within Britain and abroad was a sense that we were fighting for the creation of a revolutionary worldwide Islamic state that would dispense Islamic justice.
...
How do Islamic radicals justify such terror in the name of their religion?
There isn't enough room to outline everything here, but the foundation of extremist reasoning rests upon a model of the world in which you are either a believer or an infidel.
....
ut what radicals and extremists do is to take this two steps further. Their first step has been to argue that, since there is no pure Islamic state, the whole world must be Dar ul-Kufr (The Land of Unbelief). Step two: since Islam must declare war on unbelief, they have declared war upon the whole world.
Along with many of my former peers, I was taught by Pakistani and British radical preachers that this reclassification of the globe as a Land of War (Dar ul-Harb) allows any Muslim to destroy the sanctity of the five rights that every human is granted under Islam: life, wealth, land, mind and belief.
....
n Dar ul-Harb, anything goes, including the treachery and cowardice of attacking civilians.
The notion of a global battlefield has been a source of friction for Muslims living in Britain.
For decades, radicals have been exploiting the tensions between Islamic theology and the modern secular state - typically by starting debate with the question: "Are you British or Muslim?"




The gist of the entire article is that moslem teachings can allow for murdering 'infidels' in the name of jihad... it doesn't have geographical significance, you just kill as many infidels as you can.

Where better to find infidels than the US and Britain??



Infidel and damn proud of it.....

Originally Posted by rucker

I have been lurking the forums for awhile and know you like to resort to empty replies such as this but please, I am just too dense, can you please point it out to me?

Is it this?

[leftywa]

Originally Posted by Dhunter55

meanwhile back at the Inquisition...........

Queen Isabella: It's Spanish policy!

Pope Sixtus IV: No! It's church policy!

Torquemada: Ok, It's Spain's Holy policy.

Hear him. Religion is the cause of the vast majority of the violence in the world. Islam is doing a lousy job, but Christianity does not have clean hands.

Rwanda, Crusades, inquisition, treatment of Aztecs, Incas, Caribs and Arawaks, not just mean old catholics either. Calvin (if you are a presbyterian you are a Calvinist) and Luther both believed that heretics like catholics and unitarians and hindus and muslims should be killed. Hell, Calvin himself captured one of his primary rivals (a unitarian) and had him burned.

Kinda funny to single out one religion and claim that they are uniquely violent.

[Frenchy]

Originally Posted by Dhunter55

Hi, my name is Dhunter and I'm a Ronaholic.

Hi...I'm Frenchy, and I've been without a positive Neo-Con thought for almost a year!