![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| XDTalk Memberships | Gold Sponsorships | XDTalk Sponsors | XDTalk Pro Logo Shop | Photo Gallery | Wiki | ChatBox |
|
Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Shawnee, KS
Posts: 404
|
Interesting how the two provisions differ--note that the first provision addresses the burglary or attempted burglary of a "dwelling"; while the second one discusses "premises." Effectively means that if it is a place in which people live (i.e., a "dwelling") then deadly force may be used to defend against burglary; but if it is a premises other than a dwelling, deadly force is not generally permitted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 446
|
The way I read it is that 161.219 (1) and (3) apply anywhere. 161.219 (2) applies to burglarly in a dwelling. Take a look again, what do you think?
And 161.225 is all about your premises. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
XDTalk 5K Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Calif.
Posts: 5,599
|
I think Walter should have followed the police dept.'s lead and not mentioned any names. Now that he has outed his parents' names to the media, any friend or relative of the dirt bag know where to come to avenge his injury/probable death. Dumb, dumb IMO.
Excellent bullet placement to say the least. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 286
|
Quote:
You're right. It was incredibly naive/dangerous to out his parents like that. I am sure he didn't mean any harm, just hadn't thought his way through the entire situation yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 334
|
The Castle Doctrine is an exception to the duty to retreat (even if you must normally retreat if possible, you do not have to do so in your castle). If the state does not recognize a duty to retreat, then no Castle Doctrine is needed. Oregon does not recognize a duty to retreat.
Last edited by leftywa; 06-29-2007 at 06:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
XDTalk 500 Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Springfield, OR
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
By the way, the local news just informed the public (thankfully) that the hero was well within his rights by shooting the intruder.
__________________
XD40 V10 (ported) XD40 SC OD Green "The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people...that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." -Thomas Jefferson to Major John Cartwright June 5th, 1824 |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|