![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| XDTalk Memberships | Gold Sponsorships | XDTalk Sponsors | XDTalk Pro Logo Shop | Photo Gallery | Wiki | ChatBox |
|
Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Carencro, LA
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
edited to add: Don't forget we have the Coast Guard as well. Their job is geared more towards defense of the ConUS, where the Navy is made for foreign conflict.
__________________
Mike Russell EAA Witness Elite Match (.38super) XD40 Service CZ 75SP01 (9mm) Dan Wesson Pointman 7 (.45acp) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Carencro, LA
Posts: 215
|
Now my 2 cents on the original question. As we are today, I don't think the US is prepared for another global war.
Our industries are "globalized" and are not rooted in any one country. So, this begs the question, would they support the war effort or refuse and sit back to see where the best profits could be made? Our troop force strength is low compared to past times (thanks to Klinton), so we would have to institute a draft. With the modern climate, there would be a lot of dodgers/objectors. America has grown soft IMO, and the general public (which the draft would consist of) would not be up to the task. Like most of our politicians, the general public tend to flip-flop on topics/ideals from day to day...I'm not sure they could sustain under the type of mental and physical duress that is caused by combat, especially extended combat. The "right to know" mentality would also hinder their integration into effective combat units, where you know only what you need to know to get the job done. Regarding ICBMs, Nuclear warhead Tomahawks, etc...I don't think the American public has the stomach for their usage unless they were used on us first. I also don't think the US government has the balls to actually use one, they prefer the deterrant approach with them. If we were invaded, I think there would be very high death tolls. I think most of the people would respond like sheep, wondering where their sheep dogs are only to realize that they've mostly neutered them. Most of the people that would have the strength of mind and strength of will to institute a good guerilla warfare campaign against invaders would already have been drafted and would be off in other theatres. I think another global war would cause some serious damage to our country. Especially if all or most of Central & South America were part of our enemy (they could flood our Southern border and probably make some pretty good penetration into our country). Our government would probably collapse in on itself, because they've all been working for their own agendas for so long, they wouldn't know how to work together, or they wouldn't be able to understand what kind of actions would be needed as they've gotten really touchy-feely, PC, and soft. I'm not saying we wouldn't come out on top, but it would be hard and we would need our allies to pull it off.
__________________
Mike Russell EAA Witness Elite Match (.38super) XD40 Service CZ 75SP01 (9mm) Dan Wesson Pointman 7 (.45acp) |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 228
|
If attacked we would and always have had the resolve to win. It's only when the politicos get involved that we lose.
__________________
War is cruelty. There's no use trying to reform it, the crueler it is the sooner it will be over. --William Tecumseh Sherman-- Phil Member NRA Vietnam Vet. -------------------------- SA EMP 9mm Colt Defender 45ACP S&W 1911PD Gunsite edition 45 ACP |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
XDTalk 5K Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Virginia, C.S.A.
Posts: 5,836
|
Quote:
A long cigar shaped underwater craft creeps to within 100 miles of an 'enemy' coast.....multiple tomahawks launch from vertical tubes, we still have horizontal launch capability too...alot of missles can be fired from an SSN attack sub. If we really want to get serious, we send in a Boomer....SSBNs mean the jokes over, time to die! And we have quite a few subs I might add, and they can destroy or make alot of real estate 'uninhabitable' for a long time to come....then don't forget the MAU ships and planes...Coasties, Naval reserve units and ships. The only thing that would hurt us would be monies for the materials of war and the fact that there is a large amount of foriegn owned US companies in the US....Kinda like what Germany went through in WW1...they pretty much went broke when the Russians joined the war. And then as far as allies.....remeber NATO had 3 roles when it was formed...to keep Germany down, Russia out, and the US in.....the former WARSAW pact nations still out number us in war weapons and availible manpower. And with our current administration stirring up crap with Putin and this missle defense garbage.....who knows....they're still pissed about Clinton stepping in during the Balkans war since the Sovs had historically been the 'protectors of the slavic states'. And they still don't like us for backing the 'White Russians' with munitions and troops during thier revolution, and stepping in during the Crimean War-the biggest war any country had fought before WW1...and the first form of 'modern warefare' that set the stage for WW1 and WW2 (which was a continuation of WW1 in Europa)....Remember, we have NEVER won any major battle alone since the War in the pacific when 90% of fighting, logistics, and manufacturing was on our shoulders....I guess it depends on who the aggressor is and who allies with them....
__________________
Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, the third time is enemy action “It is the lack of will power, and not the lack of arms which render us incapable of offering any serious resistance.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
XDTalk 4K Member
![]() |
yes we can. We were not ready before we entered WWII. If I remember correctly we went from the worlds 9th largest army pre pearl harbor to the 1st by the time they hit the beaches on D-day. I can't for the life of my find the exact figures now.
Remember we were attacked on Dec 7 1941 but didn't actually go to war until June 6 1944. My pacific history is way short but from some timeliness I was looking at it looks like the major stuff in the pacific (as far as invasion) started sometimes after D-day.
__________________
- He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself. ~Thomas Paine I will not be involved with the dreams of angry men. Founding Documents Freedom isn't free: http://www.anysoldier.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
XDTalk 5K Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Virginia, C.S.A.
Posts: 5,836
|
Quote:
Actually, the 2nd......Russia fielded the largest Army the world had seen, but most don't consider 'conscripts' part of the regular army...everyone in Russia during the Great Patriotic War was a soldat...they lost more soldats than we feilded in Europe.....and they were mobilizing troops to fight the Japanese, till we dropped the bomb, the first time.... And you're right, we decided to fight in Europe first since, strategically and logistically, it was easier to do since our allies were closer. Our War in the Pacific started in '43 and we really started rolling in '44
__________________
Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, the third time is enemy action “It is the lack of will power, and not the lack of arms which render us incapable of offering any serious resistance.” Last edited by einheit 13; 06-09-2007 at 11:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
XDTalk 4K Member
![]() |
I had a nagging feeling Russia was the biggest but like I said I couldn't find the info. Thanks for clearing it up.
__________________
- He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself. ~Thomas Paine I will not be involved with the dreams of angry men. Founding Documents Freedom isn't free: http://www.anysoldier.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
XDTalk 1K Member
|
You could beat the US Navy with the right tactics and equipment. Remember this story?:
http://www.freepress.org/departments...ay/9/2005/1237
__________________
"I've got three kids and no money. Why can't I have no kids and three money?" - homer simpson |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
XDTalk 15K Member
|
no, well, let me take that back. if it was another holocaust, maybe. but not another war to save a country or something like that. the weak-kneed and general gutlessness of the population would be up in arms and crying a sob story to the government.
evil prevails when good men do nothing, and right now, i get the feeling that way too many politicians and citizens would rather do nothing than do what's right and it's sad and pathetic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
XDTalk 1K Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Kalifornia
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
__________________
Everyone else hase one... http://jmanwit.blogspot.com/ God Doesn't Let The Angels Die... Springfield Armory Xtreme Duty .45 ACP The .45 ACP - 230 grains of freedom! Remington 870 Security 12 gauge M1 Garand "The single greatest battle implement ever devised by man" - A great American CMMG M4gery |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|