![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| XDTalk Memberships | Gold Sponsorships | XDTalk Sponsors | XDTalk Pro Logo Shop | Photo Gallery | Wiki | ChatBox |
|
Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
XDTalk Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 79
|
Is this right?
REF: What do ya think, General Forum.
In that same gun club (an indoor range). The two guys behind the counter were talking. One them stated that the center of the target should always be at shoulder height. This way you are always shooting perpendicular to the floor and straight on to the back stop. This seemed pretty stupid to me. You would be training to take head shots, not center of mass, unless attacked by Shaq'el O'Neal. And what about new shooter, one badly anticipated round and it might not even hit paper.
__________________
Stupidity Kills, but not nearly enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
XDTalk 2K Member
|
Well, the back stop is designed to accept bullets from a certain angle... And while you probably SHOULD try to accomodate that, I can't imagine that a handgun is going to cause any damage to a backstop, even if you fired it perpendicular to the surface. Just make sure all of your shots HIT the backstop, and not the floor or ceiling, and I think everyone would be happy.
And, I don't know anyone who trains to take just headshots. I'd say COM are your most important shots to work on... I mean, headshots are nice, but the majority of your shooting should be to as small an area COM as possible, right?
__________________
"Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." [Do good always, whether through life or death, love or hate.] "He who relies solely on warlike measures shall be exterminated; he who relies solely on peaceful measures shall perish." Photo thread is back! (Until next disaster) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
XDTalk 1K Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Land of pretentious, viperous, rancorous little, little men
Posts: 1,553
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
XDTalk Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 79
|
COM, I believe this also. But I haven't shot much at indoor ranges.
But if the COM is at head height, wouldn't that trow you off just a bit? I couldn't believe that a few degrees off would make that much of a difference to the backstop.
__________________
Stupidity Kills, but not nearly enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
XDTalk 2K Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 2,054
|
The problem is that if you have a target that's bull's eye is low even only as low as say your belly or waist and you are shooting at close range relative to the total length of the range then suddenly you have the very real likelihood that the bullet might strike the ground in front of the bullet trap. At this point the bullet’s final trajectory is more in question. You want the bullet to hit the plate at the back of the range first and the leveler your shots are the more ensured you can be the bullet trap will function correctly.
mcb |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|