XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
 

Go Back   XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! > Main Room > XDTalk Chatter Box
Register Forum Rules Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
XDTalk Memberships Gold Sponsorships XDTalk Sponsors XDTalk Pro Logo Shop Photo Gallery Wiki ChatBox


Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

*** Registration also removes the In-Text Advertising when viewing threads on XDTalk! ***

Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2005, 07:54 AM   #21
XDTalk 100 Member
 
Nickle1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 298
Hard enough my friend, hard enough
__________________
XD-40
PA-63
Ithaca 1911
Kimber .45 Ultra CDP II
Nickle1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2005, 09:20 AM   #22
NiK
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ft Benning, GA
Posts: 1,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickle1
Quote:
Originally Posted by WWIIArmsLover
I just got to thinkin' something about that rifle doesn't seem right in the movie. We agree its a Sig SG-550. The descriptions I've read here, and at the website Krackels points out says it's semi-auto. Yet at the point when Bourne runs from behind the gas fire into the woods, the sniper shoots at him with an automatic burst, or at least the sound fx used is an auto burst. Any thoughts?
Your thinking to hard. It's a movie not a documentary on firearms. Some sound effect geek that has never even seen a real gun put that noise there.
yep. an off-topic example: some chick flick with Matthew McConaughey (however the hell you spell it) had him riding a Triumph Bonneville which is an inline twin. When he twisted the throttle, I'll be damned if the potato-potato sound of a V-twin didn't come rolling out.
NiK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2005, 01:54 PM   #23
XDTalk 5K Member
 
Brickboy240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 9,252
I thought both of those Bourne movies were very well done.

In a world of crappy, predictable, polished and stupid actions flicks, those movies were pretty good adaptations of Ludlum's books to film. The second film was grittier and I liked the fact that the director useda handheld camera for most of the shots, giving it a more realistic feel to the scenes and it added an element of uneasiness to the film that was inline with the character Bourne is supposed to be. Good stuff.

Especially when you compare how the last Tom Clancy book was re-hashed into a movie, with Ben Afleck chasing neo-nazi terrorists that blow up Baltimore....ugh! Clancy's books could be made into mamzingly good movies, but it has yet to be done. Give the the Bourne movies anyday.

-Brickboy240
__________________
The top 25% of wage earners in America pay 86% of all federal income taxes collected. (according to 2007 IRS website data)

Es mejor morir a pie que vivir arrodillado

Volvo...the Swedish Brick!
Brickboy240 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2005, 01:59 PM   #24
XDTalk 100 Member
 
Nickle1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 298
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brickboy240
I thought both of those Bourne movies were very well done.

In a world of crappy, predictable, polished and stupid actions flicks, those movies were pretty good adaptations of Ludlum's books to film. The second film was grittier and I liked the fact that the director useda handheld camera for most of the shots, giving it a more realistic feel to the scenes and it added an element of uneasiness to the film that was inline with the character Bourne is supposed to be. Good stuff.

Especially when you compare how the last Tom Clancy book was re-hashed into a movie, with Ben Afleck chasing neo-nazi terrorists that blow up Baltimore....ugh! Clancy's books could be made into mamzingly good movies, but it has yet to be done. Give the the Bourne movies anyday.

-Brickboy240
I agree. I have both Bourne movies on DVD and can't wait for the 3rd. It's this generations james bond, only without the hoky laser watches and missle launching astin martins.
__________________
XD-40
PA-63
Ithaca 1911
Kimber .45 Ultra CDP II
Nickle1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2005, 02:21 PM   #25
XDTalk 5K Member
 
Brickboy240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 9,252
The Bond films were fun, but you have to admit, that some of the worst gunplay is to be found in the Bond films.

-Brickboy240
__________________
The top 25% of wage earners in America pay 86% of all federal income taxes collected. (according to 2007 IRS website data)

Es mejor morir a pie que vivir arrodillado

Volvo...the Swedish Brick!
Brickboy240 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005, 02:14 PM   #26
XDTalk 100 Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 298
Speaking of surpressors, have you guys tried the homemade 2 liter plastic Coke bottle trick? I made one for my 10/22 and effectively took out an Armadillo that was tearing up our lawn in the middle of the night. All you could hear was the sound of the action...sounded like a hammer hitting a nail. I also used a 22 short handloaded into the chamber so that also decreased the noise.
Arnisandyz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005, 02:18 PM   #27
XDTalk 100 Member
 
Nickle1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 298
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arnisandyz
Speaking of surpressors, have you guys tried the homemade 2 liter plastic Coke bottle trick? I made one for my 10/22 and effectively took out an Armadillo that was tearing up our lawn in the middle of the night. All you could hear was the sound of the action...sounded like a hammer hitting a nail. I also used a 22 short handloaded into the chamber so that also decreased the noise.
No, but I saw james bond do it once.

Does it work consistanly or just the first shot?
__________________
XD-40
PA-63
Ithaca 1911
Kimber .45 Ultra CDP II
Nickle1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005, 02:20 PM   #28
XDTalk 5K Member
 
Brickboy240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 9,252
I use Remington CB22 22 longs in my Winchester Model 62 pump and it is no louder than an air rifle and takes out the average raccoon, skunk and stray housecat with the power of a 22lr.

Makes for a great "midnight sniper" stealth varmint-getter.

-Brickboy240
__________________
The top 25% of wage earners in America pay 86% of all federal income taxes collected. (according to 2007 IRS website data)

Es mejor morir a pie que vivir arrodillado

Volvo...the Swedish Brick!
Brickboy240 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005, 02:24 PM   #29
XDTalk 100 Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 298
It's pretty quiet on the first shot, if the following shots go through the same hole its actually only a little louder. The problem I was having was my rigged mount was duct-taped on so when the bottle shifted it blew more/bigger holes in the end. I'm sure somebody could do it better, using glasspack insulation etc, but I didn't have time to mess with it. Just wanted the Armadillo taked out....quietly.

Another problem was that the damn bottle was so big I couldn't use the sights! Had to point shoot.
Arnisandyz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:21 PM.


 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Daniel Kao DBA XDTalk & Kao Holdings