XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
 

Go Back   XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! > Main Room > XDTalk Chatter Box
Register Forum Rules Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
XDTalk Memberships Gold Sponsorships XDTalk Sponsors XDTalk Pro Logo Shop Photo Gallery Wiki ChatBox


Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

*** Registration also removes the In-Text Advertising when viewing threads on XDTalk! ***

Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-21-2006, 01:47 PM   #21
XDTalk 500 Member
 
DoctorDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: If you need to ask, you don't need to know...
Posts: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
Bad idea give this control to the FEDS. All it takes is one "bad" President to drive to overturn the law, then no one has the rights. As an example, if Billary became President, she would overturn it.
I agree with your position, OS, but there's no need to look into the hypothetical future for an example. We already have a real good example of a president who drives to overturn the law, leaving no one any rights. Not mentioning any names, ya unnerstan...
__________________
If humans evolved from monkeys, how come there's still monkeys??? Huh? Huh????
DoctorDawg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 06:43 PM   #22
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 797
Send a message via Yahoo to Timmy44221
I think on your drivers licence, it should show if you have any violent convitions/ felonies. No more backgound cheacks, or licences, if you have aclean record you can do what you want.
Timmy44221 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 08:30 PM   #23
XDTalk 4K Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 4,691
Send a message via MSN to jednp Send a message via Yahoo to jednp
maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought this bill would simply make states have to accept ccw permits from other states, but it does not guarantee you the chance to get a CCW permit. States that currently do not allow CCW, will still be able to keep it out. I was under the belief that this is just for the states that have CCW, to have to accept all permits from all states. If that is true, i don't see much taking away of state rights to mandate if they have CCW or not. Only thing I see is the feds making it so we can carry anywhere that CCW is allowed, which helps enforce our rights more. They realise we have the right to CCW in most states, and they realise the importance of people having protection when people travel.

Also, I was under the impression that you are still going to have to obey other states laws regarding CCW and firearms. It's not going to change state laws, and make it one federal law. States will still have power to mandate where CCW is allowed and all laws pertaining to it.

If I'm wrong, somone correct me, but when i read about this not long ago this is the impression I got.

Also, someone correct me if I'm thinking of a different bill in the works. Only one I knew about was making permits valid anywhere CCW is legal.

Last edited by jednp; 09-21-2006 at 08:33 PM.
jednp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006, 08:44 PM   #24
XDTalk 100 Member
 
sas-xd45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcb
Screw all this! The 2nd amendment say I have the right to bear arms. That's all the law we should need. If I choose to bear those arms concealed that is my choice. What's all this talk about state law vs federal law.

THERE SHOULD BE NO CONCEALED CARRY LAW AT ALL!

Get your federal and state law off my Second Amendment rights please! If I can legally own a firearm (ie not a felon) then I should be allowed to carry it however I like.

Ranting and Rambling
mcb


And they all replied in unison. . ."A M E N"

-s
__________________
Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them.
-Thomas Paine
sas-xd45 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 04:08 AM   #25
XDTalk 2K Member
 
jeff221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 2,364
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcb
Screw all this! The 2nd amendment say I have the right to bear arms. That's all the law we should need. If I choose to bear those arms concealed that is my choice......

...If I can legally own a firearm (ie not a felon) then I should be allowed to carry it however I like....
The 2nd amendment doesn't mention felon's, so if you were to be a strict constutionalist, you'd think that a felon should have the right to "bare arms"
__________________
Springfield XD40 Sub-Compact Bi-Tone (.40S&W)
Springfield XD9 Tactical Black (9mm)
Springfield G.I. Milspec Stainless 1911-A1 (.45 ACP)
Kimber Raptor II 1911 (.45 ACP)
Kel-Tec P-3AT (.380 ACP)
Charter Arms "Off Duty" Revolver (.38 Spl)
Ruger 22/45 Mark III (.22 LR)
Smith&Wesson M&P15A 16in AR-15 (.223/5.56 NATO)
BushMaster Carbon-15 (.22 LR)
BushMaster XM15 E2S 20in AR-15 (.223/5.56 NATO)
Stoeger P350 Tactical Pump Shotgun (12 Gauge)
Winchester Black Model98 Canon (10 Gauge)
jeff221 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 04:32 AM   #26
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 659
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcb
Screw all this! The 2nd amendment say I have the right to bear arms. That's all the law we should need. If I choose to bear those arms concealed that is my choice. What's all this talk about state law vs federal law.

THERE SHOULD BE NO CONCEALED CARRY LAW AT ALL!

Get your federal and state law off my Second Amendment rights please! If I can legally own a firearm (ie not a felon) then I should be allowed to carry it however I like.

Ranting and Rambling
mcb
Interesting concept. Never thought of it along those lines.
__________________
USN Retired, Life Member NRA, Eagle Scout
standerson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 04:54 AM   #27
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Wu Wei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 658
Quote:
Originally Posted by repeet
Jeff,

you are dead on right. I'm tired of half educated "conservatives" jumping on the "have the Feds make them do it" band wagon. Like "prayer in the schools". Then, we can have each generation legislate who the appropriate list of "gods" are to pray to. (We already can't use the name Jesus).

And don't worry DoctorDawg, there are still some of us Anti-Federalists out there.
I agree with everything except the Jesus comment. At least in WI you can pray to anyone you want. A teacher cannot LEAD a prayer to Jesus or anyone else is all. I'm good with that. I feel very offended when Christians assume everyone in the room wants to pray to Jesus. Nothing like a self-conscious adolesent sitting there silent while everyone else prays to make one feel like a freak..School is hard enough already, and we are a secular nation of freedoms after all. If a private school teacher wants to sing the praises till the rafter lift, that all good, I'm only talking publicly funded school here.

Good thoughts on the federal CCW law! At first I thought "Yay!" (no CCW here in WI), then you guys brought up the big picture..I can see truckers or CCW-holding travelers having an easier time with federal coverage though..Wasn't it here (this forum) that someone had their gun seized in a NJ airport even though it was legally carried/stowed? Kind of reminds me of helmet laws - sometimes I don't wear one, and carrying a helmet in case passing into a helmet state is waay lame. Interesting.
__________________
"Since when do lyrical skills have to do with killin' a cat? / What kind of chitlins is that?" -MF Doom

Humans have always carried a projectile weapon, a blade, and fire. Who am I to discard my humanity?

Last edited by Wu Wei; 09-22-2006 at 04:56 AM.
Wu Wei is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 04:55 AM   #28
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Wu Wei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 658
Damn buttons..oops sorry double-post.
__________________
"Since when do lyrical skills have to do with killin' a cat? / What kind of chitlins is that?" -MF Doom

Humans have always carried a projectile weapon, a blade, and fire. Who am I to discard my humanity?
Wu Wei is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 07:23 AM   #29
mcb
XDTalk 2K Member
 
mcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 2,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff221
The 2nd amendment doesn't mention felon's, so if you were to be a strict constutionalist, you'd think that a felon should have the right to "bare arms"
Not really I believe (although I cannot easily quote constitutional sources to support this opinion) that once you are a convicted felon you have essentially given up your rights. A felon has decided to willfully break the law and thus probably does not deserve the same rights as someone that is willing to live within the law.

mcb
__________________
If at first you don't succeed; RELOAD _ _ _ _ My web site
mcb is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2006, 08:28 AM   #30
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 797
Send a message via Yahoo to Timmy44221
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcb
. A felon has decided to willfully break the law and thus probably does not deserve the same rights as someone that is willing to live within the law.

mcb
I agree with that. I believe that criminals have broken the "Social contract", in a Hobbs sort of way, and no longer have the rights they once had.
Timmy44221 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:45 PM.


 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

XDTalk is a subsidiary of the Kao Holdings Group
Maintained by Kao Solutions, a subsidiary of the Kao Holdings Group