Quote:
Originally Posted by JJay03
I dont see how anything like that could affect you in court...I can see it affecting you if you said Im sorry I didnt mean to shoot them...I dont know just doesnt make sense to me but I hate politics and stupid laws.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LagerHead
I have seen lawyers chime in that they are not aware of a single instance where anyone has won any damages due to a trigger job being done. Besides that, if it's a justifiable shoot how your gun was set up is going to matter exactly zilch. It's just legal paranoia as far as I'm concerned.
|
I have to agree with these two, that line of reasoning makes very little sense(although, there is a lot in courts that does not).
I can only see two scenarios where trigger modifications(and none others) could possibly be problem: 1) a defense of "accidental discharge", or 2) a claim against the shooter which states that more rounds were fired than needed to successfully defend oneself - excessive force.
Otherwise, if the victim's statement is that they raised their gun with the sole intention of shooting the attacker (multiple times) in self-defense, the trigger was going to be pulled whether it is set to 10 lbs or 3 lbs. And, private citizens are not held to the same standard of performance as law enforcement officers, who are professionals by training and trade. Multiple shots fired is defensible, unless the attacker was already down. At which point, trigger pull really doesn't matter.