XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
 

Go Back   XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! > Main Room > XD-45ACP Discussion Room
Register Forum Rules Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
XDTalk Memberships Gold Sponsorships XDTalk Sponsors XDTalk Pro Logo Shop Photo Gallery Wiki ChatBox


Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

*** Registration also removes the In-Text Advertising when viewing threads on XDTalk! ***

Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2006, 08:43 PM   #41
XDTalk Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJDan
Yeah...this is just freaky. I'll be interested to know what actually happened.

Did the shipping box you used have your buddys address on it or something of that nature?
No, it was a previously unmarked box. My address was clearly written on both the FedEx shipping label that went on it, and the order form enclosed. This is one reason I keep copies of such things.

It's possible that SA once had a customer who lived where my buddy now lives, but I sure don't know how they pulled that address out of their ass & associated it with my name. Go figure!
Objekt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 08:46 PM   #42
XDTalk Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshGrrrr
SA has no clue what this other person has done to the receiver while he had it. What if he damaged it? I'm sure they want to check it out before sending it to an already pissed off customer. Imagine how pissed he'd be if he got it back from the other guy and something was screwed up. Who do you think he'd blame? Not the other guy. He would be even more pissed at SA. I think having it shipped directly to the owner from that random guy is not only potentially unsafe, it just wouldn't be very smart from a liability standpoint.
That's a good point, and probably summarizes the reply I will get from SA Custom tomorrow morning.

While I can understand why they would want to do it that way, it's still an extra 1-2 weeks I'll have to wait. "Never" is a long time, but it would take a lot to convince me to do business with SA Custom again.
Objekt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 09:06 PM   #43
XDTalk Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 47
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by VAXDGUY
Statistically speaking, there's no way in hell SA could combine party with random name and party at random address and have the two parties know each other.
In spite of your allegedly exhaustive knowledge of statistics, it is clear that SA found a "way in hell" to combine my name with somebody else's address. That the address happens to belong to a friend of mine means nothing more than that SA got "lucky."

Quote:
Originally Posted by VAXDGUY
Sounds like somehow you're the point of failure here, not SA. I have better odds of winning the lotto while being hit by lightning than SA "randomly" shipping your slide to someone you happen to know.
SA screwed up, yet you insist that they didn't. Why? The mere fact that I once lived in the same city they happened to ship my slide to is of no relevance, and does not get them off the hook. Maybe if they'd shipped it to one of my previous addresses, you would be on to something. No, wait...you would still be wrong, since I clearly wrote my current address on both the order form, and the box I used to ship my slide.

I can't imagine why you would attempt to blame me for SA's screwup. Your assertion is frivolous and ignorant, yet mildly amusing.
Objekt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 06:23 AM   #44
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 1,139
Wink Vandenberg AFB next stop

I would not be surprised if S.A. ships it to Vandenberg AFB next.
happygunner is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 06:42 AM   #45
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Objekt
In spite of your allegedly exhaustive knowledge of statistics, it is clear that SA found a "way in hell" to combine my name with somebody else's address. That the address happens to belong to a friend of mine means nothing more than that SA got "lucky."



SA screwed up, yet you insist that they didn't. Why? The mere fact that I once lived in the same city they happened to ship my slide to is of no relevance, and does not get them off the hook. Maybe if they'd shipped it to one of my previous addresses, you would be on to something. No, wait...you would still be wrong, since I clearly wrote my current address on both the order form, and the box I used to ship my slide.

I can't imagine why you would attempt to blame me for SA's screwup. Your assertion is frivolous and ignorant, yet mildly amusing.
You're looking at that backwards. If they had shipped to your PREVIOUS address it's most likely SA's fault.
Since they didn't, and it to was a person you happened to know....there's no way out of the 300 million people in the US that that could have happened.

Frivolous? Ignorant? Hardly. I'm not attempting to blame anyone. I'm rationally analyzing the situation, and having taken statistics and having slept in a Holiday Inn it's not a bad analysis.
VAXDGUY is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 09:15 AM   #46
XDTalk 100 Member
 
dosei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by VAXDGUY
You're looking at that backwards. If they had shipped to your PREVIOUS address it's most likely SA's fault.
Since they didn't, and it to was a person you happened to know....there's no way out of the 300 million people in the US that that could have happened.

Frivolous? Ignorant? Hardly. I'm not attempting to blame anyone. I'm rationally analyzing the situation, and having taken statistics and having slept in a Holiday Inn it's not a bad analysis.
Shipping to the wrong address is the shippers fault...period.

And since anything from infinitely small to infinitely large can be expressed mathematically, everything is statistically possible (using the laws, or should I say absence of laws, in chaos theory), since statistics are just math equations. For instance, the probability of something happening that has never happened before could be expressed as "1 in infinity". But given the fact that throughout history, things have happened that had never happened before, the odds are actually much greater than that (to the point that one could say this was inevitable).
__________________
"Freedom is a system based on courage"
dosei is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 02:32 PM   #47
XDTalk 500 Member
 
TheXDkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 628
Quote:
Originally Posted by dosei
Shipping to the wrong address is the shippers fault...period.

And since anything from infinitely small to infinitely large can be expressed mathematically, everything is statistically possible (using the laws, or should I say absence of laws, in chaos theory), since statistics are just math equations. For instance, the probability of something happening that has never happened before could be expressed as "1 in infinity". But given the fact that throughout history, things have happened that had never happened before, the odds are actually much greater than that (to the point that one could say this was inevitable).
^shows knowledge of statistical anaylysis....... this is the same concept people use to count cards in blackjack.... long story but same concept
__________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides." – Thomas Jefferson
TheXDkid is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 02:53 PM   #48
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 959
Quote:
Originally Posted by dosei
Shipping to the wrong address is the shippers fault...period.

And since anything from infinitely small to infinitely large can be expressed mathematically, everything is statistically possible (using the laws, or should I say absence of laws, in chaos theory), since statistics are just math equations. For instance, the probability of something happening that has never happened before could be expressed as "1 in infinity". But given the fact that throughout history, things have happened that had never happened before, the odds are actually much greater than that (to the point that one could say this was inevitable).
Very true, but if you factor in how finite the quantity of guns SA ships, inevitability isn't quite so inevitable.
VAXDGUY is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 02:56 PM   #49
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Miguel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 1,869
OK, I hated stats class. I just want to see how SA corrects things, and what their explanation for what happened.
__________________
Miguel
Enjoying my XD .45ACP Tactical. need to break in my 870, and my wife's XDSC9.

I carry my XD45 ACP Tactical, in a SuperTuck from CB. Very comfortable, easy to hide, easy to draw, and easy to reholster.

Looking for an HDR*, either an AR-180B, or Kel-Tec FBR.

HDR, Homeland Defense Rifle
Miguel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 07:55 PM   #50
XDTalk Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 47
Question Yet Another Update

I haven't received a reply from Springfield, but I did get a note from my buddy yesterday, saying UPS had picked up the package as scheduled.

Here's what should happen after that:
Today: Springfield receives the package from UPS via overnight service, inspects it, repacks it, and ships it out again.
Tomorrow: UPS overnights it to my door.

From prior experience with UPS, I know full well they'll try to deliver when I'm not home, and I'll end up having to drive to their @#$%&* depot to pick it up, even if it is overnighted.

I'll post again with what actually happens. Once my slide is back, I am at minimum going to write Springfield to ask for my $8.95 shipping and handling fee to be refunded. This is ridiculous.
Objekt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:39 PM.


 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

XDTalk is a subsidiary of the Kao Holdings Group
Maintained by Kao Solutions, a subsidiary of the Kao Holdings Group