Canyon Creek vs Springer Precision for Trigger workThis is a discussion on Canyon Creek vs Springer Precision for Trigger work within the The Polling Place forums, part of the Use and Training category; I've been reading on the forums, and these two shops are highly recommended. I wanted to see how many people went with each, as well ...
 |
12-28-2006, 12:49 PM
|
#1
|
|
XDTalk Newbie
Member #: 14283
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 19
|
Recent feedback for Canyon Creek or Springer Precision on Trigger work
I've been reading on the forums, and these two shops are highly recommended. I wanted to see how many people went with each, as well as any feedback (good or bad) Thanks!
Last edited by chinnobi; 12-28-2006 at 03:02 PM.
|
|
|
12-28-2006, 01:05 PM
|
#2
|
|
XDTalk 500 Member
Member #: 4305
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 677
|
Welcome to the Forum. You sure aren't starting out on a good foot. If you have read the forum there are MANY posts about each of these fine gunsmiths. You will not go wrong with whomever you chose. I just don't see the point of haveing a "my smith is better than" poll or ANOTHER thread on the subject.
__________________
XD9 Service Bi-Tone for Carry
XD9 Compact Bi-Tone for BackUp
XDm 5.25 Competition Bi-Tone for Production
RRA CAR A4 w/EOTECH for side matches
RRA LAR-PDS Pistol with Tri-Rail Handguard
USMC Veteran E-4 MOS 3531/0931
USPSA CRO - L3093 (forever 'C' Class) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 post(s).
|
|
|
12-28-2006, 02:14 PM
|
#3
|
|
XDTalk 500 Member
Member #: 3339
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: River Falls, WI
Posts: 857
|
I am with Bob on this one I don't think there is a right or wrong answer to this question they both do good work.
__________________
XD Aficionado
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 post(s).
|
|
|
12-28-2006, 03:00 PM
|
#4
|
|
XDTalk Newbie
Member #: 14283
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 19
|
I don't mean any disrespect to either gun smith. I guess I chose the wrong set of words to get my point across. I was just looking for more recent feedback on the work that both these smith's have done. Sorry for any confusion.
|
|
|
12-29-2006, 01:55 AM
|
#5
|
|
XDTalk 2K Member
Member #: 4886
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,022
|
Both of them do top notch work.
I've yet to hear of ANYONE being dissatisfied with their work.
__________________
.
When seconds count, the police are only five minutes away.
------------------------------------
MY PARTIAL TOY LIST
XD-9 5" (Production)
XD-40 5" (Limited10)
SA 1911 Loaded (Limited10/SingleStack)
STI Spartan (Limited10/SingleStack)
Kahr PM9 (CCW) KT P3AT (CCW)
Remington 11-87 (Trap)
Remington 870 Express (HD/Trap)
Misc Rifles for fun and hunting
|
|
|
01-24-2007, 08:24 AM
|
#6
|
|
XDTalk Member
Member #: 7003
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Smoky Mtns, TN
Posts: 83
|
FWIW, I own XD's with triggers from both. I prefer the CC, but that may well be because I had it first and had been shooting it for some time prior to shooting the Springer.
__________________
XD40 SC w/Springer trigger
XD40 Service w/CC trigger, DGR and BigDots
XD40 Service w/Springer Trigger and TFO's
XD40 Service w/CC trigger, DGR and TFO's
XD9 Service w/Meprolights
|
|
|
01-24-2007, 09:51 AM
|
#7
|
|
XDTalk 1K Member
Member #: 14335
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,447
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mtnvalley3
FWIW, I own XD's with triggers from both. I prefer the CC, but that may well be because I had it first and had been shooting it for some time prior to shooting the Springer.
|
Can you put into words the difference in feel between the two?
|
|
|
01-24-2007, 04:53 PM
|
#8
|
|
XDTalk Member
Member #: 7003
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Smoky Mtns, TN
Posts: 83
|
I'll try. Bear in mind this is based solely on my guns (1 CC, 2 Springers) and not a wider sample. I've also only shot the Springers 3x since getting 'em back. Additionally, these are all "carry" jobs, so the differences between the competition triggers may be less significant.
CC's takeup is shorter, as is the reset. Break is is as crisp as Elvis' bacon.
Springer job was a marked improvement over stock, but since I had been shooting with the CC for several months, shooting the Springer didn't give me the "holy sh*t!!" feel that shooting the CC for the first time did.
By comparison, it felt somewhat mushy and long to me; that said, a local friend had his XD done with a Springer carry job and was delighted with the improvement over stock trigger. Unfortunately, I didn't get together with him to shoot his before sending mine.
It could well be a "personal preference" thang. No disrespect to Springer intended, as his carry trigger job is an improvement over stock and is somewhat less expensive (and is reversible). I just prefer the CC.
__________________
XD40 SC w/Springer trigger
XD40 Service w/CC trigger, DGR and BigDots
XD40 Service w/Springer Trigger and TFO's
XD40 Service w/CC trigger, DGR and TFO's
XD9 Service w/Meprolights
|
|
|
Lower Navigation
|
|
|
| Search tags for this page |
|
canyon creek and springer precision xd40, canyon creek custom xd work, canyon creek precision, canyon creek trigger work, canyon creek vs springer, canyon creek vs springer precision, powder creek precision, springer precision better than canyon creek, springer precision vs canyon creek, springer precision vs canyon creek trigger job, springer precision vs. canyon creek, springer preprecision vs canyon creek for xd trigger work, springer trigger vs. prp vs. canyon creek, springer vs canyon creek, springer vs powder river vs canyon creek
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|