Obama, Romney, or a third party?

[dawgchamp]

Originally Posted by Dirty Deuce

If 2A and the constituition is your "single issue" then it's clear who you should be voting for if you have a brain, and it isn't Obromney.

No need to get personal. But if someone does have a brain, then their choice among the two obvious choices is, in fact, a no-brainer. And to the poster that denies Romney has it in the bag, you've missed the latest news.

To be clear, I'm no Romney fan. Far from it. But to not vote for him is to ensure the continued utter destruction of our country. Period.

[Dirty Deuce]

Originally Posted by dawgchamp

No need to get personal. But if someone does have a brain, then their choice among the two obvious choices is, in fact, a no-brainer. And to the poster that denies Romney has it in the bag, you've missed the latest news.

I wasn't getting personal, there's no point in that. As far as your comment goes IMO that only applies if you're one of the MSM mass media controlled zombies. This is still a three horse race until Tampa.

Hell, they've been saying Romney has it won for MONTHS. It wasn't the case then, and it isn't the case now. We don't need 4 more years of Obama, but anyone that truly believes Romney is any different is dillusional. They're two sides of the same corrupt FED backed coin.

I don't care who anyone votes for personally, that's each individuals business. The fact is, in this country the two party system is a joke. You only have the illusion of choice. I will not cast a ballot for either of the establishment candidates.

Seriously, look at the how the media has treated the different candidates and you'll see clear trends. There is one man that they've tried to obscure from the onset of the race. Now, do you support the guy that would shake things up, support the constitution, and use sound money principles or do you support the guy picked by the very people that have gotten us into the situation we're in?

It's either more of the same with nothing changing or it's hard tough choices that will hurt but will start turning things around.

[dawgchamp]

I'm assuming you're a Ron Paul fan. Please excuse me if I'm wrong. But don't insult my intelligence in ASSuming I'm a media-bot. Far from it.

But the contest is over. Seriously. It's Romney vs. MaObama. Deal with it.

[ekim]

Originally Posted by dawgchamp

Keep one thing in mind. The recent D.C. gun law decision in SCOTUS was decided on a 5-4 vote. Whoever wins this election will decide the court's composition upon the next retirement of a justice, which is imminent.

That president will either be Obama or Romney. Nobody else.

What's your choice?

I don't think the Supreme court will rule the 2nd amendment UN Constitutional, that would be a call to arms they don't want to see in this country, regardless of the number of liberal Supreme Court judges. I think the UN Treaty would be passed first and be ruled UN Constitutional, but not until many people where killed trying to take away U.S. citizens weapons.

IMO, the Supreme Court ruling on obamacare will be a bigger issue and will have a big effect on the election, if not causing rioting and possible marshall law to be declared. The left is poised to explode already, their just looking for an excuse.

[dawgchamp]

Originally Posted by ekim

IMO, the Supreme Court ruling on obamacare will be a bigger issue and will have a big effect on the election, if not causing rioting and possible marshall law to be declared. The left is poised to explode already, their just looking for an excuse.

I agree. Rioting is poised to happen for a great many crises effectively created by the left, Zimmerman being another issue. In the likely even that the market crashes again just before the election, which the charts indicate is likely in October, that is another issue that could trigger rioting or worse.

When, not if, Zimmerman is acquitted, the Rodney King-inspired riots will seem like a walk in the park.

[Dirty Deuce]

Originally Posted by dawgchamp

I'm assuming you're a Ron Paul fan. Please excuse me if I'm wrong. But don't insult my intelligence in ASSuming I'm a media-bot. Far from it.

But the contest is over. Seriously. It's Romney vs. MaObama. Deal with it.

I assume nothing. However, if that's what you took from it then I guess the adage "If the shoe fits..." applies.

It isn't over until it's over. We'll see what happens in Tampa. You may or may not like it, but that's how it is. Deal with that.

[Mjolnir]

Ok so unless there is a broken convention, there is no possible way for anyone other than Romney right. So unless Ron Paul is selected as the republican nominee, he can't win. Why do his supporters think he can as a third party candidate against Romney who he lost to in the primary. Now Romney is not my first choice but he is better than obama ( anyone who says he is the same is ignorant ) and if Ron Paul would have won the primary's than he would get my vote. Ron Paul has views that I don't agree with as does Romney but at least they both have private sector exprience and both believe in a Amercia closer to my picture of America.

[dawgchamp]

Originally Posted by Dirty Deuce

I assume nothing. However, if that's what you took from it then I guess the adage "If the shoe fits..." applies.

It isn't over until it's over. We'll see what happens in Tampa. You may or may not like it, but that's how it is. Deal with that.

If the shoe fits indeed. If you honestly think that Romney isn't going to win the nomination, even after already having the numbers, well I just don't want to waste any more of my time on the irrational.

[Carnivorous]

Originally Posted by ekim

I don't think the Supreme court will rule the 2nd amendment UN Constitutional, that would be a call to arms they don't want to see in this country, regardless of the number of liberal Supreme Court judges. I think the UN Treaty would be passed first and be ruled UN Constitutional, but not until many people where killed trying to take away U.S. citizens weapons.

IMO, the Supreme Court ruling on obamacare will be a bigger issue and will have a big effect on the election, if not causing rioting and possible marshall law to be declared. The left is poised to explode already, their just looking for an excuse.

Yeah but not many of them have guns, so what's the problem?

[Carnivorous]

Originally Posted by AwPhuch

Kinda sad when the Constitution itself is circumvented by the decision of the judicial system rather than the rule of law or even the democratic process..hell mob rule would be better because many MORE of us WANT our guns...but nope...get judges up there that vote against it and the Constitution itself = null/void

HOW UTTERLY FRIGHTENING IS THIS?!?!!?!?

I'm not sure about that - polls look like they're trending towards more gun acceptance, but we have a long way to go. This CBS poll shows that more people want stricter gun control than want them to stay the same, or want them more relaxed - it's only when the stay-the-sames and the less-strict vote together that they out-vote the more-strict crowd.

Poll: Americans Remain Split on Gun Control - Political Hotsheet - CBS News