XDTalk Forums - Your XD/XD(m) Information Source!                      

Go Back   XDTalk Forums - Your XD/XD(m) Information Source! > Non-Firearms Related > The Political View
XDTalk Memberships Gold Sponsorships XDTalk Sponsors XDTalk Pro Logo Shop Photo Gallery Wiki ChatBox

 
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2008, 06:54 PM   #41
XDTalk 15K Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 15,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsh341 View Post
Here's an idea for you to consider.

In the early 1800's there were 60-100 million buffalo roaming the plains and countless more elk, deer, and moose that there are today

American Bison - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Current domestic livestock number about 105 million.

Cattle Outlook: Live Demand Showing Strong Growth - Cattle Network


Are the farts of domesticated cattle more potent than wild animal farts? I sincerely doubt it.

I'd suggest you look somewhere else for the cause of your imaginary global warming.
I think the quality of the diet of the animals has something to do with the amount of methane they produce. Those free ranging animals of the 1800s were eating prairie grass - probably healthier than what most cattle eat today.
  Share
Etta Place is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 11-28-2008, 07:07 PM   #42
XDTalk 10K Member

 
XDConvert9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Atlanta Suburbs
Posts: 11,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etta Place View Post
Why? We have food coops here. This is a large city. There are community gardens here. They have them in Chicago and New York too. We have large organic farms within San Diego County. Illinois and New York have an abundance of farming communities, as does California and most states. I don't know that economies of scale in farming is that relevant - or desirable anymore. I could be wrong.

I think people growing their own food is a good idea.
What percentage of the population currently uses Co-ops and community gardens? Maybe 5% on the high side? Now, jack that up to 100% and see if the supply can still meet demand.

I think it's a good idea in theory too. Just not so much in actual practice in today's society.
__________________
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. When there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."
  Share
XDConvert9mm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 11-28-2008, 07:07 PM   #43
XDTalk 25K Member

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etta Place View Post
We should eat local. I don't care where you live.
So you are capable of growing everything you need ??
  Share
AZXD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 11-28-2008, 07:11 PM   #44
XDTalk 25K Member

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etta Place View Post
Grow a garden or join a coop and buy meat grown as near to your house as possible. People out here have community gardens if they don't have room in their yards. It would take some adjustment, but I think it would be worth it.
I await the collapse, and hope you are able to tell us how well that works out before you die of starvation.

Keep giving us those updates.

Ignorance is Strength
  Share
AZXD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 11-28-2008, 07:12 PM   #45
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 684
First the ethanol issue stressing animal ag, then the horse slaughter ban, now this. Nonsense legislation will be the death of animal agriculture, and also plant agriculture, in this nation.
  Share
deerslayer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 11-28-2008, 07:13 PM   #46
XDTalk 25K Member

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etta Place View Post
Why? We have food coops here. This is a large city. There are community gardens here. They have them in Chicago and New York too. We have large organic farms within San Diego County. Illinois and New York have an abundance of farming communities, as does California and most states. I don't know that economies of scale in farming is that relevant - or desirable anymore. I could be wrong.

I think people growing their own food is a good idea.
And you still bring in 100's of big trucks of food daily.

Face reality ... You'd die.
  Share
AZXD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 11-28-2008, 07:14 PM   #47
XDTalk 25K Member

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etta Place View Post
I think the quality of the diet of the animals has something to do with the amount of methane they produce. Those free ranging animals of the 1800s were eating prairie grass - probably healthier than what most cattle eat today.
You grasp at straws that do not exist.
  Share
AZXD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 11-28-2008, 07:18 PM   #48
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 684
^^ Good point AZXD. To say that free-roaming bison had a better, more nutrient rich diet than feedlot cattle do probably shows a blatant lack of understanding in ruminant nutrition. One pound of prairie grass does not have the TDN of an equal weight of commercial cattle feed found in a feedlot.
  Share
deerslayer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 11-28-2008, 07:19 PM   #49
XDTalk 15K Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 15,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZXD View Post
You grasp at straws that do not exist.

I know that diet affects methane production. I admit ignorance on the difference between buffalo/bison of the old days and the cattle of today. I read that confining them on feedlots and giving them grain produces more methane.
  Share
Etta Place is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old 11-28-2008, 07:20 PM   #50
XDTalk 15K Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 15,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by deerslayer View Post
^^ Good point AZXD. To say that free-roaming bison had a better, more nutrient rich diet than feedlot cattle do probably shows a blatant lack of understanding in ruminant nutrition. One pound of prairie grass does not have the TDN of an equal weight of commercial cattle feed found in a feedlot.

What is TDN?
  Share
Etta Place is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.xdtalk.com/forums/political-view/93045-epa-wants-tax-livestock-emissions.html
Posted By For Type Date
THOUGHTS ON TURNING 60 « Berry Street Beacon This thread Refback 12-01-2008 02:17 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

XDTalk is a subsidiary of Crossbreed Holsters, LLC