Who is the momma?

[AZXD]

They say a picture is worth a thousand words ... But I prefer video that has a date of 04/05/2008. Start at 3 minutes 40 seconds ... Unless you want to learn about Juno ... With the clothing she's wearing ... It's hard to tell, but she might be hiding something.

http://blip.tv/play/mVexs1KCsy8

As for a final verdict ... I'll wait for a verified source to give me more than speculative BS and political story.

ETA: Juno looks nice.

[rpsmith]

correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't doing a c&p without giving the source called plagiarism?

[AZXD]

Originally Posted by rpsmith

correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't doing a c&p without giving the source called plagiarism?

It might be a self portrait ... Avatars are rarely representative

[AZXD]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

This photo was taken on March 14 2008, more than seven months into the pregnancy. Which she wasn't.

Originally Posted by LKB3rd

How is that trolling? The girl looks pregnant. Even the way she is cradling her belly, like pregnant women often do.
Maybe she just has a weird way of growing belly fat, and is the only 17 year old girl in the world who wears tight clothes and cradles her big belly lovingly... but I personally doubt it.

Good logic ... Can you explain the guy "cradling his belly, like pregnant women often do" ??

[justgotback]

Originally Posted by LKB3rd

But it isn't trolling, it is simply a part of this story. Trolling isn't "anything that JGB doesn't like."

Go back and look at the history of his posts, and let me know if the definition of troll is correct.

[LKB3rd]

Originally Posted by justgotback

Go back and look at the history of his posts, and let me know if the definition of troll is correct.

Call him a troll when he trolls, not when he posts pertinent info to a discussion.

[LKB3rd]

Originally Posted by AZXD

Good logic ... Can you explain the guy "cradling his belly, like pregnant women often do" ??

I don't understand why some people will go to such lengths to avoid seeing what is in front of their eyes. Ok, maybe in the pic, she is standing in a normal picture pose. Maybe she is a 17 year old that wears clothes to accentuate her fat belly, that looks like a pregnant belly.
Now go find a picture of a fat guy, and tell me that according to my logic he is pregnant. Make sure he had mononucleosis for 6 months during the time that his thin mother claims to have been pregnant. Make sure she did everything except look or act pregnant. Make sure she kept it a secret that she was pregnant. Make sure that her fat son is 17 years old, and would be a huge political liability if he got pregnant. Make sure that several of his friends say that they were told that he was pregnant. It should be easy, and you'll blow my logic out of the water.

[XDConvert9mm]

Originally Posted by LKB3rd

I don't understand why some people will go to such lengths to avoid seeing what is in front of their eyes. Ok, maybe in the pic, she is standing in a normal picture pose. Maybe she is a 17 year old that wears clothes to accentuate her fat belly, that looks like a pregnant belly.
Now go find a picture of a fat guy, and tell me that according to my logic he is pregnant. Make sure he had mononucleosis for 6 months during the time that his thin mother claims to have been pregnant. Make sure she did everything except look or act pregnant. Make sure she kept it a secret that she was pregnant. Make sure that her fat son is 17 years old, and would be a huge political liability if he got pregnant. Make sure that several of his friends say that they were told that he was pregnant. It should be easy, and you'll blow my logic out of the water.

You're dealing with what some in legal circles call "circumstantial evidence". It doesn't hold up in Court and it's not holding up here.

If you have some hard facts, not your own biased assumptions, please post them. Until then this argument is getting really old.

Put up or Shut up time LK.

[LKB3rd]

This isn't a court of law, and I am just pointing out that what we have appears to support the argument that she was pregnant. If that turns out to be false, then so be it. If it means that the MILF vp candidate of your boy McCain is a liar, then so be it.
It is really sad to me how people will take sides between two horrible candidates, then suddenly become cheerleaders for them, and naysayers when it appears that they might be frauds.

[XDConvert9mm]

Originally Posted by LKB3rd

This isn't a court of law, and I am just pointing out that what we have appears to support the argument that she was pregnant. If that turns out to be false, then so be it. If it means that the MILF vp candidate of your boy McCain is a liar, then so be it.
It is really sad to me how people will take sides between two horrible candidates, then suddenly become cheerleaders for them, and naysayers when it appears that they might be frauds.

You can stop right here. The bolded says it all about your attitude on this subject.

It's really sad to see how far some far left wingnuts will go to discredit somebody they have no real information about. The reactions from the left tell me that McCain made a great choice. Watching the opposition make fools of themselves has and will continue to be be quite entertaining.