47% of Americans favor Govt. regulation on media

[yeahYeah]

Rasmussen Reports™: The most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a presidential election.

Nearly half of Americans (47%) believe the government should require all radio and television stations to offer equal amounts of conservative and liberal political commentary, but they draw the line at imposing that same requirement on the Internet. Thirty-nine percent (39%) say leave radio and TV alone, too.
At the same time, 71% say it is already possible for just about any political view to be heard in today’s media, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Twenty percent (20%) do not agree.
Fifty-seven percent (57%) say the government should not require websites and blog sites that offer political commentary to present opposing viewpoints. But 31% believe the Internet sites should be forced to balance their commentary (full demographic crosstabs available for Premium Members.)
Please sign up for the Rasmussen Reports daily e-mail update(it’s free)… let us keep you up to date with the latest public opinion news.
In a July 2007 Rasmussen Reports survey, Americans were evenly divided on whether or not the government should require political balance on TV and radio stations. A survey this week has shown that voters consider media bias a bigger problem than large campaign contributions.
Conservatives have expressed alarm in recent months over congressional Democratic efforts to restore the so-called Fairness Doctrine which would mandate politically balanced commentary on the airwaves.
Just this week Robert McDowell, a Bush appointee to the Federal Communications Commission, suggested that the restoration of the Fairness Doctrine, abolished in 1987 by the Reagan administration, could lead to government regulation of content on the Internet.
Democrats are more supportive of government involvement in the airwaves than Republicans and unaffiliated voters. Fifty-four percent (54%) of Democrats favor it, and only 26% are opposed. Republicans and unaffiliated voters are fairly evenly divided.
Even Democrats say hands-off the Internet though but by a far smaller margin than Republicans and unaffiliated voters. Democrats oppose government-mandated balance on the Internet by a 48% to 37% margin. Sixty-one percent (61%) of Republicans reject government involvement in Internet content along with 67% of unaffiliated voters.
Only 45% of Americans say they are following recent news stories about the Fairness Doctrine even somewhat closely, while 15% say they are not following the story at all.
Democrats have been pushing the Fairness Doctrine in part because of the long-standing complaint by liberals that conservatives dominate talk radio. Conservatives counter that their political foes are just trying to use the government to push liberal talk radio even though it has been rejected by the marketplace.
In the new survey, 42% say there are more conservative radio talk shows because they get better ratings, but 28% believe it is because stations owners are biased. Seventeen percent (17%) attribute it to an unspecified other reason, and 13% are unsure.
Most Republicans (61%) believe conservative talk radio has flourished because of the ratings, with only 11% saying it is due to bias. Democrats, on the other hand, see bias as the reason over ratings by a 42% to 28% margin. Among unaffiliateds, 42% say ratings and 27% say bias.
Voters in all categories agree by sizable margins that it is possible for just about any political view to be heard in today’s media.
With the Congress expected to stay firmly under Democratic control, the responses of those who plan to vote for the party’s presidential candidate Barack Obama versus his Republican opponent John McCain suggest what direction the Fairness Doctrine debate is likely to take in the coming year. Fifty-eight percent (58%) of likely Obama voters believe the government should make all radio and TV stations offer equal amounts of conservative and liberal commentary, as opposed to 40% of potential McCain voters who feel that way. But 63% of McCain voters and 53% of Obama voters reject similar regulation of web sites and bloggers.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll shows that the race between Obama and McCain remains close and stable.

so much for the free market.

[afmo]

if 47% do, then that means 53% dont. Majority rules!

Seriously though...the government should not be regulating anything. The free market works, people are just afraid to let it work. They want someone there to catch them when they fall. its an understandable position. I get it. But that doesn't make it right.

The government has bloated to sizes beyond the scope authorized it in the constitution. They are mucking with things they were never intended to muck with. The founding fathers are undoubtedly rolling in their graves for the sole fact that we are even having this conversation.

[Powerman]

"Democrats have been pushing the Fairness Doctrine in part because of the long-standing complaint by liberals that conservatives dominate talk radio. Conservatives counter that their political foes are just trying to use the government to push liberal talk radio even though it has been rejected by the marketplace."

If they had a better product, or a better message, they would not need this. I have never listened to a minute of talk radio. I could care less. Rush is an idiot, but I understand why he gets ratings. "Air America" was a joke. Try putting some one on the air that does not sound like raving lunatics and maybe someone will listen.

The "Fairness" doctrine is so wrong on so many levels. It's one thing I really can't stand about the left. Their first reaction is to make Government make everyone like them. How about stop being led by the nose by the Republican Party and stand on your own two feet. Grow a pair and start getting support for better ideas and directions, AND THEN IMPLEMENT THEM! Nothing is going to change the fact that they can't accomplish anything.

[Krackels]

I saw that... it's disgusting that so many Americans would spit upon our constitution and favor government rewriting the first Amendment.



Make no mistake... if Obama's elected the Dems will be saying "Thank God he was able to be elected in spite of the monopoly the neocons have on the media... we need the fairness doctrine to ensure we'll have 'fair' coverage in the future."

If Obama's not elected it'll be ... "is it any wonder that Obama wasn't elected... especially with the monopoly that the Neocons have on the media... we need the fairness doctrine."

Fairness doctrine or not, if it's passed I'll keep on speaking my mind regardless of the consequences.

[yeahYeah]

Originally Posted by Krackels

I saw that... it's disgusting that so many Americans would spit upon our constitution and favor government rewriting the first Amendment.

its for their own good...think of the children.

47% of this country has no clue what the constitution has in it.

[Krackels]

Michael Medved's talking about it right now.
WNTP_AM..

[Krackels]

Originally Posted by yeahYeah

its for their own good...think of the children.

47% of this country has no clue what the constitution has in it.

Yeah, but we can't let our rights be pissed away because of other people's ignorance.

[XDConvert9mm]

Originally Posted by Krackels

Michael Medved's talking about it right now.
WNTP_AM..

I just listened to this and one caller had this statement:

"I've never seen a program that really worked without Government control".

Wow. There's a bunch of them like this out there this election cycle, apparently.

[yeahYeah]

Originally Posted by XDConvert9mm

I just listened to this and one caller had this statement:

"I've never seen a program that really worked without Government control".

Wow. There's a bunch of them like this out there this election cycle, apparently.

that caller needs to be deported. how can they think that? everything the govt. touches aside the military fails!

[Pharmakon]

The number one reason liberalism exists is due to fear. There are things in life to be scared of and liberals want to provide a solution. Yeah they help alright, just like a loan shark.