XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
 

Go Back   XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! > Non-Firearms Related > The Political View
Register Forum Rules Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
XDTalk Memberships Gold Sponsorships XDTalk Sponsors XDTalk Pro Logo Shop Photo Gallery Wiki ChatBox


Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

*** Registration also removes the In-Text Advertising when viewing threads on XDTalk! ***

Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2008, 03:34 PM   #1
XDTalk 10K Member
 
Frenchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Mid-Missouri
Posts: 12,143
Big Government Responsible for Housing Bubble



Big Government Responsible for Housing Bubble

The House passed two bills attempting to rehabilitate the housing and mortgage market this week. There doesn't seem to be any shortage of criticism and blame for the bad decisions, and rightly so. Lenders and banks do share much of the blame for the overheated market. Lending standards were relaxed, or even abandoned altogether, creating an exaggerated pool of homebuyers that led to ballooning home prices that many, especially real estate investors, expected to continue forever. Now that the bubble has burst, the losses are staggering.

MORE...
Big Government Responsible for Housing Bubble
__________________
~SC Harvey~

Because Fritz says so!

"Though the flame of liberty may sometimes cease to shine, the coal can never expire."
Thomas Paine, The American Crisis, #1, December 23, 1776

http://mikeharvey.org/

RON PAUL IN 2008
Frenchy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 08:44 PM   #2
Don
XDTalk 4K Member
 
Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Pullman, WA
Posts: 4,138
Quote:
However, many in Washington fail to realize it was government intervention that brought on the current economic malaise in the first place. The Federal Reserve’s artificially low interest rates created the loose, easy credit that ignited a voracious appetite in the banks for borrowers.
Huh? This sound more like less government involvement and the lenders could not control themselves. How is this government intervention?
__________________
Don
geek with guns
Why don\'t you all f-f-f-fade away....
FAQ - Don\'s Guide Rod
Don is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 08:50 PM   #3
XDTalk 2K Member
 
XDConvert9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Atlanta Suburbs
Posts: 2,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don View Post
Huh? This sound more like less government involvement and the lenders could not control themselves. How is this government intervention?
The Fed intervened by setting the rates too low for too long so everyone could get drunk at the cheap credit party. True, it was kind of a passive intervention but it was still there.
__________________
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. When there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."
XDConvert9mm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 09:06 PM   #4
Don
XDTalk 4K Member
 
Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Pullman, WA
Posts: 4,138
Passive intervention? Too many counters to even begin to post (my brain overloaded on this one). So without federal intervention no lending business could make a good risk decision?


Quote:
Originally Posted by XDConvert9mm View Post
The Fed intervened by setting the rates too low for too long so everyone could get drunk at the cheap credit party. True, it was kind of a passive intervention but it was still there.
__________________
Don
geek with guns
Why don\'t you all f-f-f-fade away....
FAQ - Don\'s Guide Rod
Don is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 09:25 PM   #5
XDTalk 2K Member
 
XDConvert9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Atlanta Suburbs
Posts: 2,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don View Post
Passive intervention? Too many counters to even begin to post (my brain overloaded on this one). So without federal intervention no lending business could make a good risk decision?
No, I didn't say that. The Fed is an independent body so that political influences, in theory, don't play into their decisions. The passive intervention I was referring to was simply leaving the rates alone after setting them too low for too long. They did not further "intervene" and raise them in time for this bubble to be avoided. Classic case of too much cheap money supply chasing borrowers. There's more to it than this but the basics are here.
__________________
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. When there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."
XDConvert9mm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 05:48 AM   #6
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,240
I guess I'm one of few people left in the world who blames this mess entirely on borrowers. I don't care how much money someone is trying to give you; don't take more than you can pay back.

Trying to blame the banks and the Fed is just a bunch of finger-pointing. They were stupid and I don't really feel sorry for them, but they weren't the end-cause of this mess. Irresponsible Americans were.
east_stingray is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 05:53 AM   #7
XDTalk 2K Member
 
XDConvert9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Atlanta Suburbs
Posts: 2,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by east_stingray View Post
I guess I'm one of few people left in the world who blames this mess entirely on borrowers. I don't care how much money someone is trying to give you; don't take more than you can pay back.

Trying to blame the banks and the Fed is just a bunch of finger-pointing. They were stupid and I don't really feel sorry for them, but they weren't the end-cause of this mess. Irresponsible Americans were.
I think it's more of a combo here ES. The Fed supplied the party substance, much like a bar or a dealer. Do you have to indulge? Absolutely not. That's where the personal responsibility part comes in. So there I agree with you.
__________________
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. When there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."
XDConvert9mm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 06:37 AM   #8
XDTalk 1K Member
 
jmichna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NE Illinois
Posts: 1,104
Who invented the lending vehicles such as Adjustable Rate Mortgages, or Balloon Mortgages? Was it the Fed, or the lending institutions? Who chose to implement those products? Was it the Fed or the lending institutions?

On the flip side, who chose to borrow money via an ARM or Balloon mortgage?
Who was foolish (and/or greedy) enough to take out such a mortgage, when fixed rate interest mortgages were there to be had... albeit at initially higher interest rates and less attractive payment levels?

In my view, the Fed was essentially a "raw material supplier"... they only supplied the "commodity" to be marketed... the commodity being "cheap money" via low interest rates. The "market" (lenders and borrowers) chose to take the riskier options and to maximize return (for the lenders, more and higher risk customers; for the borrowers, lower payments or more house than could really be afforded).

For those who advocate even more government involvement or control, two thoughts:
1) Have you looked at a warning label lately?
2) What has increased government control improved for you lately? What has it made better, cheaper, faster?
__________________
There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance— that principle is contempt prior to investigation.
- Herbert Spencer
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Watch your thoughts, for they become words. Choose your words, for they become actions.
Understand actions, for they become habits. Study your habits, for they become character.
Develop your character, for it becomes your destiny.
jmichna is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 06:46 AM   #9
XDTalk 2K Member
 
XDConvert9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Atlanta Suburbs
Posts: 2,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmichna View Post
Who invented the lending vehicles such as Adjustable Rate Mortgages, or Balloon Mortgages? Was it the Fed, or the lending institutions? Who chose to implement those products? Was it the Fed or the lending institutions?

On the flip side, who chose to borrow money via an ARM or Balloon mortgage?
Who was foolish (and/or greedy) enough to take out such a mortgage, when fixed rate interest mortgages were there to be had... albeit at initially higher interest rates and less attractive payment levels?

In my view, the Fed was essentially a "raw material supplier"... they only supplied the "commodity" to be marketed... the commodity being "cheap money" via low interest rates. The "market" (lenders and borrowers) chose to take the riskier options and to maximize return (for the lenders, more and higher risk customers; for the borrowers, lower payments or more house than could really be afforded).

For those who advocate even more government involvement or control, two thoughts:
1) Have you looked at a warning label lately?
2) What has increased government control improved for you lately? What has it made better, cheaper, faster?
JM, if you're referring to my post then let me make you aware that I am not advocating more government control of, well....anything. I run mostly Libertarian in regards to issues like this. The issue in this thread is a backward looking one, not forward. The fact remains that the Fed does control U.S. interest rates and money supply today as it did during the ramp up to the implosion.

My most honest opinion is that it is difficult to paint the entire situation with one broad brush. There are too many variables in individual cases and circumstances to do that.
__________________
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. When there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."
XDConvert9mm is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 07:05 AM   #10
XDTalk 3K Member
 
eric_t12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SD
Posts: 3,322
Send a message via MSN to eric_t12
Quote:
My most honest opinion is that it is difficult to paint the entire situation with one broad brush. There are too many variables in individual cases and circumstances to do that.
i agree completely.

...but i still say its partly their fault
eric_t12 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:25 AM.


 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Daniel Kao DBA XDTalk & Kao Holdings