XDTalk Forums - Your XD/XD(m) Information Source!                      

Go Back   XDTalk Forums - Your XD/XD(m) Information Source! > Non-Firearms Related > The Political View
XDTalk Memberships Gold Sponsorships XDTalk Sponsors XDTalk Pro Logo Shop Photo Gallery Wiki ChatBox

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2008, 09:37 AM   #71
XDTalk 25K Member

 
AZXD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28,538
LOL
What a joke!
McCain has forgot the basic reason that Russia fell. What country was the former Soviet Union F'ing around in just before economic collapse ???
Where are we, now ???

The man clearly has his priorities backwards, or has a plan to multitask this country into oblivion.
__________________
--->Dirty Deeds done with sheep<---

The Bloody History of Communism

INN PERIL | Serving the Spirits of Freedom and Liberty
  Share
AZXD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 10:45 AM   #72
XDTalk 2K Member
 
trik396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: currently elsewhere
Posts: 2,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZXD View Post
LOL
What a joke!
McCain has forgot the basic reason that Russia fell. What country was the former Soviet Union F'ing around in just before economic collapse ???
Where are we, now ???

The man clearly has his priorities backwards, or has a plan to multitask this country into oblivion.
Russia was trying to take over Afghanistan... I think that's a major difference between us and them...
Come on AZXD, that type of comparison is below your intelligence.
__________________
‘‘When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans ...... And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it.’’
— Bill Clinton, 3-22-94
  Share
trik396 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 10:50 AM   #73
XDTalk 15K Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 15,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by tortoise1956 View Post
We didn't force the former east bloc nations to join NATO. They eagerly requested membership in order to prevent falling under the Russian sphere of influence again. What you fail to understand is that allowing them to be swallowed by Russia would be a repudiation of what we stand for as a nation - that everyone has an inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, no matter who they are. I for one have no problem with letting them become part of an alliance that doesn't depend on coercion and force to maintain its membership.

Remember one thing; Russia and its leaders have had dreams of empire for at least the past 500 years. This has not changed under Putin, although it may be better disguised. Once you wrap your head around that, it may be easier to understand their actions in that context.
What about bribing people to join NATO? And, it's Lieven's contention that the U.S. can't back up its promises to defend these nations.

I don't believe it is the job of the United States to go around the world trying to force others to get life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That's in our founding documents, not anyone else's. Let others pursue and find their own way. Some, such as those in Russia, seem to value stability over freedom at this point. Putin had 70% approval ratings - a lot higher than anyone in our government!!

And, the U.S. already is an empire - not exactly what the Founders had in mind. The Russians may dream of one, but they don't have the capability at this point to get one.

It sounds to me like Putin is trying to establish a certain level of deterrence and strength in his country so the U.S. can't push them around. How would the U.S. react if Russia tried to get Guatemala or Honduras or Costa Rica to join some alliance with them? Georgia and the Ukraine are right on their borders.

And, I'm sure Putin has a big ego, but his behavior is based on realistic, geopolitica/geoeconomic considerations. With its increase in energy revenues, Russian elites now have the wherewithal to play more assertively on the world stage, Putin or no Putin. Putin (and now Medvedev) is simply an orchestrator of the national social forces now controlling Russia - the energy tycoons, the Russian military industrial complex and security sectors, the nationalist industrial elites, etc.

The U.S. post-Soviet-collapse aggressive strategy of world domination has played a big part in Russia's behavior. The neoliberal economic policies foisted on Russia during the 90s pretty much devastated the country. A popular nationalist reaction was the inevitable result of those policies.

Last edited by Etta Place; 05-06-2008 at 10:53 AM.
  Share
Etta Place is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

XDTalk is a subsidiary of Crossbreed Holsters, LLC