Time Magazine Compares Iwo Jima to Global Warming

[FrankRizzoXD40]

Originally Posted by Etta Place

Well, I guess we shall see who's right eventually, Dan. Keep driving that Hummer. You're just cutting off your nose to spite your face and precipitating your own destruction.

Just like when the greenies warned about GLOBAL COOLING and the mass destruction and starvation it would bring a couple decades ago?

Look how that all turned out.

And how the same people are talking about warming.

Frank

[FrankRizzoXD40]

Originally Posted by jmichna

The Deniers is one of the

Etta,
Can you describe or explain, briefly, your understanding of the scientific method? How do you understand scientific laws or truths to be determined?

It's pointless to ask...

I already posted that list and she determined in ONE MINUTE that ALL of the scientists on that list are not credible. See below.

Originally Posted by FrankRizzoXD40

(@ 12:17) -- scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm not trying to prove anything true or false, just suggesting that the vast majority of scientists and experts do not necessarily agree with the mainstream theory.

Originally Posted by Etta Place

(@ 12:18 ) -- Those scientists are not a majority and their scientific credentials are in question.

Frank

[jmichna]

Originally Posted by JeffXD

Actually, that isnt true. Below is my opinion of Bush's latest opinion on global warming. This issue should not be political. ALL politicians need to stay the hell out and not make policy in the hopes they will gain political support. The IPCC is an excellant example of twisting any data they can get thier hands on to promote thier agenda.

"For the record, I am pretty irritated tht Bush has jumped on the global warming band wagon this week. He no more than any other politican has the knowledge to take position on this issue other than to gain some politcal currency. I see his recent proclamation as nothing more than that."

+1MM

[FLSTFI Dave]

Originally Posted by DanTheEldest

Who?

Maybe it's a generational thing (or just me), but I think that magazine ceased to be relevant about ten years ago.

I think it was longer than that.

Originally Posted by FrankRizzoXD40

lol! That's laughable...

Yep...we should declare war on global warming without any proof that it is caused by man, says the greenies, leftists, and etta place...

but wait!!! Aren't they the same people who said that we invaded Iraq without proper evidence of WMD??? That we shouldn't start wars without concrete evidence???

Frank

While I hardly find time magazine a credible source of information.

They have gone over the line with that cover. That cover is a insult to me, and it should be to every serviceman or woman of this great country. How can they disgrace a picture of very Heroic Marines like that.

[retired]

My next car.

Chevrolet | 2009 Chevy Corvette ZR1 Sport Convertible

[JeffXD]

Originally Posted by retired

My next car.

Chevrolet | 2009 Chevy Corvette ZR1 Sport Convertible

I love the new design. There was something about the flip-up headlights I never did care for. That particular model is sweet.

[jmichna]

Originally Posted by JeffXD

...There was something about the flip-up headlights I never did care for....

Yup, they cease to function properly at about five years... they are either always flipped up, or, you only drive during daylight hours.

[retired]

they are either always flipped up, or, you only drive during daylight hours.

Or one is up and one is down, giving it a goofy look.

I had a 74 that I bought in 77 and thankfully had no problem with the lights. I also got rid of it in 79, so I must have just missed that 5yr. plan jmichna referred to.

[jdavionic]

Did they say we needed to attack the same problem on Mars too?

[FrankRizzoXD40]

Originally Posted by jdavionic

Did they say we needed to attack the same problem on Mars too?

Frank