Republican Gayness

[jdavionic]

Originally Posted by FrankRizzoXD40

Then, wouldn't it be reasonable to question the fascinations of those who START threads about homosexuality?

This makes the 2nd thread that you've started about this topic.

Frank

You may be on to something there, Frank.

bd = backdoor, coincidence?

[XDinNC]

He's the Joe McCarthy of the gay population. There's one behind every door.

He's just having a hissy because he failed at spreading the dailykos lies on this site. He's also resorted to name calling since he can't back up what he's posted.

[FrankRizzoXD40]

Originally Posted by jdavionic

You may be on to something there, Frank.

bd = backdoor, coincidence?

It is just kind of silly that he would accuse OTHERS of being obsessed with homosexuality when HE is the one who started this thread about homosexuality (along with a couple of other threads).

It just doesn't make any sense.

Frank

[Son of Norway]

Originally Posted by FrankRizzoXD40

Where in this thread did I "call someone out"?

I eagerly await your reply. I doubt that I will get much of one.

Thanks,

Frank

FrankRizzoXD40, did you not quote bd in your signature with the intent of being antagonistic towards another forum member? And now you quote Delija. It certainly isn't because sharing opinions and ideas is good, it's because you wish to antagonize members. That doesn't make you smart, it just makes you an ass.

Many of your arguments are very good and I appreciate most of them whether or not I am in agreement. But when you go on a mission to discredit and flame other members with your "bumper sticker" signatures...well, sorry bud, I can't respect that.

[FrankRizzoXD40]

Originally Posted by Son of Norway

FrankRizzoXD40, did you not quote bd in your signature with the intent of being antagonistic towards another forum member?

No, I didn't. The intent was to expose the dangerous thinking of the far-left. I EVEN LEFT OUT bd's forum handle and replaced it with "X"'s. If the intent was to be antagonistic, I would have put his name in my sig.

Originally Posted by Son of Norway

And now you quote Delija. It certainly isn't because sharing opinions and ideas is good, it's because you wish to antagonize members. That doesn't make you smart, it just makes you an ass.

I quote Delija because he has been on a mission to antagonize me. Did you not notice the the thread that he started ABOUT ME?? Any of the posts that led up to that? Any of the times where I ASKED HIM TO STOP being antagonistic and to stop hijacking threads? Ask around...

Originally Posted by Son of Norway

Many of your arguments are very good and I appreciate most of them whether or not I am in agreement. But when you go on a mission to discredit and flame other members with your "bumper sticker" signatures...well, sorry bud, I can't respect that.

Thanks, but I am on no such mission. You want a summary of my "mission"?? I disagree with liberals and I can't just go around claiming that I don't like them and that they are hypocrites, weak on defense, gun-grabbers, appeasers..etc...etc...unless I provide some substantiating facts/evidence to back up what I am saying. Usually I have to look no further than some of the foolishness that is posted in this forum. It is a coincidence that most of the time these kinds of quotes come from bd and delija. There just aren't that many liberals on this board.

For some reason, bd and delija do not like it when someone reminds them of their own opinions, in the form of their own words. By judging by the majority of their posts, I don't blame them.

I could say the same to you and claim that your "mission" to to take things that people say out of context, like you did with me and the Reagan quote. But I don't think that is your intent all the time.

I think that you have grossly miniterpereted my intent. If you still can't respect it, then I'm sorry.

I enjoy the majority of your posts. I think that you contribue a great deal to this forum.

Frank

[jdavionic]

Originally Posted by Son of Norway

FrankRizzoXD40, did you not quote bd in your signature with the intent of being antagonistic towards another forum member?

Actually I didn't see bd's initials in Frank's signature. However I do see Frank's in bd's signature. Yet I don't see your post addressing bd's antagonistic tactic. Is that posted elsewhere? Or just another case of selective outrage?

[DanTheEldest]

Originally Posted by jdavionic

You may be on to something there, Frank.

bd = backdoor, coincidence?

Hah! Kinda reminds me of the self-loathing character Willem DeFoe played in the Boondock Saints.