Republican Gayness

[jdavionic]

Originally Posted by bd

If you are capable of finding the Republican Party's stances on homsexuality then you should find what Mehlman's stance is - officially. But his personal stance may be different.

That would not be at all unusual to have to or more stances in the Republican party because of rampant hypocrisy and flip-flopping with the wind.

Do you need any more questions answered?

bd

Yes. You are the one that labeled Mehlman a hypocrit. Back it up and answer the very specific question that I asked -

Originally Posted by jdavionic

Exactly what and when has Ken said any hateful comments toward homosexuals? Bd, if you can't answer these questions, then it's just another worthless post...

You are squirming again. Your response above doesn't cut it. Try again. Face it. You did it again. You copied an article, made inflammatory remarks surrounding it (including the title of the post itself), now you're called on it, and once again, you can't back it up. And once again, it's a worthless Bd post. If you're going to criticize the republican party, there's plenty of valid criticisms out there. You're post is not one of them.

[jimbo2]

I told you people.

This is only the beginning; bd must keep posting anti-Republican threads to keep any pressure whatsoever off of his Democrat majority heros.

His Democrat majority heros are not to be questioned or challenged on ANY issues.

I love how the Dem's try to keep your focus on the Iraq war while the bastardize the constitution. The Dem's are the ones that are trying to strip our gun rights and thanks to their policies in a few years you will have NO property rights.

[eleanor]

Originally Posted by jimbo2

I told you people.

This is only the beginning; bd must keep posting anti-Republican threads to keep any pressure whatsoever off of his Democrat majority heros.

His Democrat majority heros are not to be questioned or challenged on ANY issues.

I love how the Dem's try to keep your focus on the Iraq war while the bastardize the constitution. The Dem's are the ones that are trying to strip our gun rights and thanks to their policies in a few years you will have NO property rights.

Golly-gee -- isn't it just possible the debacle in Iraq has kept the focus on Iraq? Didn't your peerless leader, Pres. Bush bring the focus BACK to Iraq just before the election? What have the Dems done to "bastardize The Constitution" in the last 6+ years? All the loss of rights can be put squarely at the Republicans doorstep -- they were the ones with ALL the power.

By the way, what was said about ANYONE who dared question the "
Glorious Policies Of Our Glorious Leader" over the last few years? First the unending drone of -- 9/11, 9/11, 9/11 -- even if it was used to justify the sale of dishsoap (hyperbole - for effect), then the absolute connection of ANYONE who dared disagree with "terrorists", "traitors", "Godless secularists", etc., etc., etc.

Now you begrudge the poor old Democrats even ONE WEEK to gloat -- when you've had six years -- and made full use of them.

Heck, before Bush, Ann Coulter was just an anorexic skank -- it took some mighty strong "rose colored glasses" to turn that refugee from a meth lab into a "Conservative Sex Symbol".

[jdavionic]

Understand, I have no issues with constructive criticism of the republican and/or democratic party. My problem is with people that make up or purposely mislead people to criticize them. And furthermore, I get really irritated when people blindly grab an article, use it as their opinion when they've made no effort to research it.

Here we have bd making another post and claiming that Ken Melhman is a hypocrite. He posted a title "Republican Gayness". He doesn't know whether or not Ken is a homosexual. Furthermore, the title infers that if Ken is a homosexual, and that perhaps the republican party is filled with homosexuals. Who cares? Secondly, he states -

Originally Posted by bd

But I can't stand a hypocrite and it seems there are quite a few hypocrite homosexuals in the leadership of the Republican Party of Family Values.

This quote was in direct reference to Ken Melhman and the republican party. Again, he is called upon to show when Melhman has made anti-homosexual comments. And again, he can't.

So what's the point of the post? Nothing! It's another poorly thought out and completely useless post by bd. He's been called on it and he can't substantiate his position.

Valid criticisms of republicans - handling of Foley, handing of Clinton's impeachment (yeah, he lied under oath about a BJ, was it worth our money to pursue this one?), handling of the Iraq war (why did they allow Bush to change the mission to building a democracy), poor planning for the 2008 presidential campaign (they're essentially handing it to the democrats), poor communication with the successes in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the list goes on and on...

All of these are valid criticisms (and debatable). But trying to label Ken Melhman as a hypocrite Not valid and a ridiculous post.

I fully expect bd will now take another side step and avoid answering the direct question. Here it is again...let's see the next feeble attempt

Originally Posted by jdavionic

Exactly what and when has Ken said any hateful comments toward homosexuals? Bd, if you can't answer these questions, then it's just another worthless post...

[Frenchy]

I for one am surprised at some of bd's posts as of late!...He's lost all credibility with me.
There seems to be no interest in creating ideas to improve and move forward.
"V" is for Vindetta, bd...and "L" is for Loser.

[TwoValveKid]

Funny how he hasnt even contributed to the discussion! Here we go!

[bd]

Let me assure all of you that I'm not concerned about my credibility on the interent, especially with Two-brain-cell kid and his cartoons. He's almost up there with Captain Ray.

I don't guess any of you find it at all ironic that the Chairman of the Republican party was outed as a homosexual on national TV??

That's OK.... keep playing your little games in which you like to imagine yourselves as the wise, unafilliated observer who sits back and takes pot shots all all the wrong they see on both sides.

It's laughable that all you self proclaimed unbiased, "not aligned with any particular party" people are so Republican. It's hilarious that you can't see it when it's so obvious. That's why your credibility is no better than mine.

It's not hard to see where you are coming from. It's just too bad you can't see where your loyalties lie and why you're still stinging from the beating your party took last election.

If you don't like what I post and have to keep repeating questions that are already answered please read someone else's posts that are closer to your "unbiased" way of thinking....like NewXD40fun's.



bd

[TwoValveKid]

Originally Posted by bd

Let me assure all of you that I'm not concerned about my credibility on the interent, especially with Two-brain-cell kid and his cartoons. He's almost up there with Captain Ray.

I don't guess any of you find it at all ironic that the Chairman of the Republican party was outed as a homosexual on national TV??

That's OK.... keep playing your little games in which you like to imagine yourselves as the wise, unafilliated observer who sits back and takes pot shots all all the wrong they see on both sides.

It's laughable that all you self proclaimed unbiased, "not aligned with any particular party people are so Republican. It's hilarious that you can't see it when it's so obvious. That's why your credibility is no better than mine.

It's not hard to see where you are coming from. It's just too bad you can't see where your loyalties lie and why you're still stinging from the beating your party took last election.

If you don't like what I post and have to keep repeating questions that are already answered please read someone else's posts that are closer to your "unbiased" way of thinking....like NewXD40fun's.

bd

bd

[jdavionic]

Okay folks, here it is again...Look above. Do you see an answer to the very direct question below?

Originally Posted by jdavionic

Exactly what and when has Ken said any hateful comments toward homosexuals? Bd, if you can't answer these questions, then it's just another worthless post...

Nope bd, you missed again. Yet another side step attempt. Yet another empty attack on the republican party. And yes, yet another thoughtless bd post.

Care to try again? Or will it be another foolish attempt to side step it with more bs? Come on bd - it's a simple question. Care to make a fool of yourself again? Continue making half-assed posts like this one and you'll continue to lose credibility with folks that engage in meaningful political debates.

[bd]

Originally Posted by jdavionic

Okay folks, here it is again...Look above. Do you see an answer to the very direct question below?

Nope bd, you missed again. Yet another side step attempt. Yet another empty attack on the republican party. And yes, yet another thoughtless bd post.

Care to try again? Or will it be another foolish attempt to side step it with more bs? Come on bd - it's a simple question. Care to make a fool of yourself again? Continue making half-assed posts like this one and you'll continue to lose credibility with folks that engage in meaningful political debates.

You just can't accept the fact that a person is responsible for the stances of the organization if he holds the chairmanship of that group, can you?

I'm sorry I exposed the chairman of your party for what he is. But as I said I don't care if he's gay, I just can't stand hypocrites. If he's gay and he is the front man for the Republican party then he's just another Republican hypocrite. That's easy enough...

But you can't accept the responsibility part.

That's a very Republican trait, so why should anyone be surprised given your self described "unbiased" outlook.

If you had a little credibility I might be concerned about what you thought of my posts. But apparently you have given yourself the credibility you think you deserve now, which is another Republican trait.

Why don't you come out of the closet now jdavionic and admit you are just a mindless Republican shill just like NewXD40fun?

You can't take the criticism of your party and you ignore facts - you fit the bill.

'fess up, it's good for the soul.

Start all over from the beginning, don't pretend to be somerthing you're not and you'll have a much better foundation for your comments.

Look out behind you, TVK is tailgating.

bd