Godless

[jdavionic]

Originally Posted by Captain Ray

"Treason" Tell me.. were there any soviet sponsered communists in the State Department? That is BORING to you?

Raymond

No, but she wouldn't let go of the point. Yes, McCarthy was right and attacked by the left. I didn't find it shocking. Perhaps because I'm very cynical. But she ranted on it for too long in the book.

[jimmylozza]

Originally Posted by Paul

Started reading Ann Coulter's book...

I think the book title is self-referential.

[mgeoffriau]

What a highly insightful contribution. Feel free to chime in anytime you have such wonderfully precise and well-reasoned critique as this one. See you around the forums!

Originally Posted by jimmylozza

I think the book title is self-referential.

[Paul]

I saw the exchange between Coulter and Colmes. Poor Alan just can't figure it out.

What I find disgusting is the wailing of these women for more money and the liberal concept that they should not be confonted because of what happened. If you read the book you will see much of this is completely out of context. From Nilsson - "you see what you want to see and you hear what you want to hear".

I'm certainly no debat master. However, her books are entertaining and eye-opening. The louder the liberal element attacks her, the more I know she is on the right path.

Sometimes she says serious things in a "flip" way or is too direct. I find it refreshing in this day of political correctness.

There will be plenty of time for her to put on weight when she hits her 40's. I could lose the last 10lbs I have been trying to lose if I had her metabolic rate for a couple days.

One more -

Speaking of abortion

"At its most majestic, this precious right that women "have come to depend on" is the right to have sex with men they don't want to have children with."

"The problem for the Democrats is that "Give me liberty or give me the right to have unprotected sex" just isn't that inspiring a rallying cry."

Back to reading (it's overdue now!).

Paul

[jimmylozza]

Originally Posted by mgeoffriau

What a highly insightful contribution. Feel free to chime in anytime you have such wonderfully precise and well-reasoned critique as this one. See you around the forums!

Lighten up. Life's too short to spend it typing. :P

[jimmylozza]

But, I can still copy/paste and not waste too much time.

Since she brought up the topic of God in the title, I'll take the bait. Follow my logic if you will:

“Love is patient; love is kind
and envies no one.
Love is never boastful, nor conceited, nor rude;
never selfish, not quick to take offense.

Does the above describe her public persona?

"Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. The one who does not love does not know God, for God is love"

Sorry, but I just don't feel the love.

[SkyRat]

Originally Posted by jimmylozza

But, I can still copy/paste and not waste too much time.

Since she brought up the topic of God in the title, I'll take the bait. Follow my logic if you will:

“Love is patient; love is kind
and envies no one.
Love is never boastful, nor conceited, nor rude;
never selfish, not quick to take offense.

Does the above describe her public persona?

"Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. The one who does not love does not know God, for God is love"

Sorry, but I just don't feel the love.

Who does that describe? Does it describe you? Has anyone here ever been impatient, unkind, ever envied or been boastful? How about conceited or rude? Ever selfish or quick to be offended?

Yeah, I thought so, me too... Just another example of a man in need of Grace.

[jimmylozza]

Originally Posted by SkyRat

Who does that describe? Does it describe you? Has anyone here ever been impatient, unkind, ever envied or been boastful? How about conceited or rude? Ever selfish or quick to be offended?

Yeah, I thought so, me too... Just another example of a man in need of Grace.

You are so right; but, no one here wrote a book about their political enemies and titled it, Godless, either.

[Captain Ray]

Originally Posted by jimmylozza

But, I can still copy/paste and not waste too much time.

Since she brought up the topic of God in the title, I'll take the bait. Follow my logic if you will:

“Love is patient; love is kind
and envies no one.
Love is never boastful, nor conceited, nor rude;
never selfish, not quick to take offense.

Does the above describe her public persona?

"Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. The one who does not love does not know God, for God is love"

Sorry, but I just don't feel the love.

God hates.. He/she/it hates sinners.. read the ****ing bible.

Raymond

[Son of Norway]

From MediaMatters.org:

Coulter and Colmes were discussing Coulter's new book, Godless: The Church of Liberalism (Crown Forum, June 2006), in which she wrote of the 9-11 widows: "These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis. I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much." During the segment, Colmes asked Coulter: "Do you think, for one second, these women would not give up every piece of celebrity and notoriety they have to have their husbands back?" Coulter responded, "Oh, I don't know. At this point, to give up $2 million ... to have to go back to cooking meals and not ... appearing in Vanity Fair. They're clearly enjoying their celebrity status."

Controversial? Nope. There is no controversy at all, it's very clear that this media whore will say anything to get you far-right wing nuts on your knees whacking your puds with your mouths open shouting "MORE ANN, MORE!!!" She has become the very thing she speaks against in this nugget of **** that has no business being covered by any media outlet. But the idiots sop it up with a biscuit.