XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
 

Go Back   XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! > Main Room > Non-XD, Other Gun Discussion Area
Register Forum Rules Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
XDTalk Memberships Gold Sponsorships XDTalk Sponsors XDTalk Pro Logo Shop Photo Gallery Wiki ChatBox


Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

*** Registration also removes the In-Text Advertising when viewing threads on XDTalk! ***

Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-2007, 03:37 AM   #1
XDTalk 1K Member
 
bkelm18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oak Ridge, TN
Posts: 1,040
Compact .45 Recommendations

Yes, I know, a dead horse that has probably been beaten 10 times over. So sue me. I'm looking for a compact .45 for summer carry/deep concealment to replace my Kel-Tec P3AT. I don't want another XD so please don't say it, haha. The .45 XD Compact is too big for what I have in mind anyway. I've looked at the Taurus Millenium Pro PT-145 and the Glock 36. Those seem to be really the only choices I could find that weren't out of my price range. I'd really rather not go too far above $500. My only other options are revolvers. I have no experience with them. I've looked at the SW 442. It looks nice but don't know how the .38 Special stacks up ballistically with auto calibers. I read one site that said the .38 Special has the same kinetic energy as a .380 Auto, which seems kinda wrong... anyway, any help?
__________________
The United States Constitution (c)1791. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome to Tennessee, patron state of shootin' stuff.
bkelm18 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 07:06 AM   #2
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 1,325
Many people will tell you that the g36 is an unreliable gun. That being said, I have never had any FTF/FTE with my g36, it has run like a sewing machine. Don't forget about the g30, yes it's a little bigger than the g36 but it is my CCW gun of choice 90% of the time.
lora84 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 06:52 PM   #3
XDTalk 1K Member
 
RobFMJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Galveston, Texas
Posts: 1,841
Send a message via ICQ to RobFMJ Send a message via AIM to RobFMJ


Its small, but many are turned off by the weight.

I personally love it, and its definitely the softest shooting compact .45 out there.
__________________
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
RobFMJ is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 06:56 PM   #4
XDTalk 4K Member
 
Lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,959
Send a message via AIM to Lazarus
If your budget was a little higher I would recommend a compact 1911. Those Ultra Kimbers are sweet.
__________________
You never know what you'll miss until its gone.
Lazarus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 07:28 PM   #5
XDTalk 10K Member
 
jtkratzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lancaster Co., PA
Posts: 16,291
Send a message via AIM to jtkratzer
Check out the Kahr PM45...single stack .45 acp with a polymer frame...don't let the MSRP prices scare you, they're just that MSRP.
jtkratzer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 08:53 PM   #6
XDTalk 500 Member
 
ScottyPotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Akron Area Ohio
Posts: 670
The above guns are nice but out of your price range.

My brother In law has a Taurus similar to the pt-145 its the Mil Pro 745 it holds 6+1 and the size is very close to my XD-SC40. He paid $300.00 brand new. I haven't shot the glock so I wont comment on those - but his Taurus is a good shooter and he hasn't had any problems with it.

I bought a used Springfield 1911 ultra compact for $525 that was nice to carry because of the thin frame. I think the Kahr would be nice because they are thin too.

My thinking is if you really find something you like and its over your budget is to save your money and get what you want. Too many times in my life I went with the cheap thing and ended up wishing I paid a little more for what I really wanted.
__________________
My XD's
XD9 Tactical
XD40 Sub Compact
XD40 Service


You know, this crap happens with in-breeding. You can only hope the unfortunate, screwed up love child would take themselves out of the gene pool when they discover electrical outlets and butter knives or start huffing paint when they're 7 or 8 but every once in a while a truly magnificent specimen makes it to adulthood to display for the world just how freaking stupid they really are.
ScottyPotty is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 04:03 AM   #7
XDTalk 1K Member
 
bkelm18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oak Ridge, TN
Posts: 1,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottyPotty View Post
The above guns are nice but out of your price range.

My brother In law has a Taurus similar to the pt-145 its the Mil Pro 745 it holds 6+1 and the size is very close to my XD-SC40. He paid $300.00 brand new. I haven't shot the glock so I wont comment on those - but his Taurus is a good shooter and he hasn't had any problems with it.

I bought a used Springfield 1911 ultra compact for $525 that was nice to carry because of the thin frame. I think the Kahr would be nice because they are thin too.

My thinking is if you really find something you like and its over your budget is to save your money and get what you want. Too many times in my life I went with the cheap thing and ended up wishing I paid a little more for what I really wanted.
The only thing I'm hesitating on the Taurus is their reputation for crappy customer service and the fact that no one has one in my area that I can fondle. I'm hesitant about buying handguns online before I can cop a feel. The local shop did have a Kahr CW40 and oh man I almost bought that thing right there. If their economy line is that good, I'm really interested in what their higher end pistols are like, especially that PM45. I've toyed with the idea of a compact 1911 but most are rather pricey. Decisions decisions. Maybe I'll just buy the Taurus, a SW 442, and the Kahr PM45 and just eat Ramen for the next few months. I need to lose weight anyway. Haha.
__________________
The United States Constitution (c)1791. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome to Tennessee, patron state of shootin' stuff.
bkelm18 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 04:39 AM   #8
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 1,325
Didn't S&W buy Taurus out 3 or 4 years ago? If so I would think the service issue is now a moot point. I have always considered S&W to have impeccable service.
__________________
"Attitudes are contagious, do you have one worth catching?" - Oscar Wilson Banks
lora84 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 05:12 AM   #9
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 588
No, the S&W Taurus thing is all complicated and confusing, I think that when S&W was owned by the European investment group that owned them years ago, that investment group also owned some percentage of Taurus, but there was never a situation where one company owned the other. The legend is that during the time that they were under the same umbrella (ella ella eh eh eh) of ownership, a lot of information swapping went back and forth, especially regarding revolver making, and that that was the exact point in time that Taurus started making decent revolvers (Taurus does make a good revolver).

Taurus claims that information swapping did happen, but that most of the upgrading information was given from Taurus to S&W, and that you can tell by the improvement in S&W revolvers during the time they were both owned (to some extent) by the same company.

It's a fascinating story, and one that I have not been able to track down much information on, sadly.
FATSEXY is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 05:41 AM   #10
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,238
Bersa 45, under $400!

Rustynuts is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:38 AM.


 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Daniel Kao DBA XDTalk & Kao Holdings