![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| XDTalk Memberships | Gold Sponsorships | XDTalk Sponsors | XDTalk Pro Logo Shop | Photo Gallery | Wiki | ChatBox |
|
Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
XDTalk Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Villa Rica, Georgia
Posts: 95
|
Rifle vs. Pistol question, please read and respond
I was in my fav. local gun shop a few days ago, and they had a few Carbon 15 "Pistols" in, among other styles of AR variant "pistols"
Now what constitutes a pistol vs. a rifle (regarding these types of weapons, as I know fully the answer regarding to traditional pistol styles). These pistols fired the .223 round just like the rifle variant, ran 12.5" barrels, for all intents and purposes, looked just like the full size rifle variant, just with shorter barrels, and no stock (there was a post that came off the rear of the gun, where the stock would be, it looked like an M4 variant collapseable stock, minus the moving stock.)..... So how is this sold as a pistol, and not a short barrled rifle? so it being registered as a pistol, would I not be allowed to add an m4 stock to it, to increase accuracy?... please discuss... Here are a few pics of what I'm referring to, (these have shorter 7.5" barrles as stated by bushmaster website) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() reason I'm bringing this up, is I'm considering buying one and possibly doing a conversion to make somthing like this (if it's legal) ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
XDTalk 500 Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SW WA
Posts: 539
|
It would be VERY ILLEGAL if you didn't pay for an ATF tax stamp for an SBR......
If there's a stock OR a front handgrip it's a rifle according to the ATF, but if you have no stock it's considered a pistol. The definition of a pistol includes the phrase "...... to be fired from one hand ..... ". If the barrel is under 16" on a rifle (e.g. has a stock OR 2 hand grips) it's a short barrelled rifle. So in that last pic the .223 and 9mm AR's are legally considered SBR's and would require the necessary tax stamps and documentation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
XDTalk Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Villa Rica, Georgia
Posts: 95
|
Quote:
I did some checking, and came up with somthing from the ATF saying that the foregrip does not make it a sbr, it makes it an AOW (Any Other Weapon), still requireing a 200 dollar tax stamp, as it doesnt fall into the catagory of a rifle... Quote:
Quote:
I do appreciate your imput though..... I'm still searching for atf documents on the rules for a SBR...... as I really want one of these damn things.... I guess I'll have to suck up the 200 dollar stamp..... but then again, it's not much different than dropping the additonal money into the gun for accessories..... I guess ya gotta pay to play.... |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
XDTalk 1K Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 1,324
|
This becomes a rifle if you put a stock on it; with the 12.5 inch barrel, it then turns into a SBR. BATF's definition of a SBR is: "Rifle having a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inch in length." $200 tax required. See the BATF document (large PDF file, takes a while to load from their website, but very clear visual aids):
http://www.atf.gov/docs/Identificati...rearms_pt1.pdf Since not every state allows sbr (MI for example doesn't allow sbr), the gun manufacturers therefore come up with the stockless version of sbr to fit it into the pistol category. All these rules and counter measures make no sense to me if you ask me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
XDTalk 2K Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Burnsville, MN
Posts: 2,347
|
Quote:
__________________
"He took off running, and we caught him, and he just kept resisting. So we just kept whipping his ass." -HulkXD "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein If you are not part of the solution you are part of the precipitate Springfield XD-9 TOTAL COUNT 7847 Daily Carry Springfield 1911 Loaded Target 9mm Walther P22... needs bigger mag EBR Build in progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
XDTalk Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Villa Rica, Georgia
Posts: 95
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
XDTalk 3K Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 3,864
|
I see very little point in having "pistols" that shoot ammo ballistically designed for rifles and/or having "rifles" that use ammo that is designed for use in short barrelled handguns.
To each his own, and if I had the extra money I'd have one of everything. But if it's what you want and it makes you happy - then by all means I think you should have one. Just my opinion. .....from one hooligan to another....... bd |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
XDTalk 1K Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 1,038
|
I hate all these freaking stupid rules. Seriously. The more I think about the whole situation, the more pissed off I get. Freaking stupid.
__________________
I felt early on I wasn't going to be a respectable citizen. -- Cormac McCarthy We are hard pressed on every side, but not crushed; perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
XDTalk 1K Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 1,324
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
XDTalk 500 Member
|
I suggest getting a PLR-16 by kel-tec I like it better for a .223 pistol
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|