![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| XDTalk Memberships | Gold Sponsorships | XDTalk Sponsors | XDTalk Pro Logo Shop | Photo Gallery | Wiki | ChatBox |
|
Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
XDTalk Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 62
|
Observation of SA Loaded vs. Mil-Spec model
Bought a new Mil-Spec today and was surprise at the quality over my Loaded model. The Mil-Spec have serial #NM123456 (made in USA?)and my Loaded model have #N123456 (made in Brazil by Imbel). The slide/frame fit was tight with no side to side play where my Loaded model was much loser. The stock trigger (6lb) was a lot better over the Loaded model (7.5lb). Also, it came with an extra set of plastic grip. I think this is the best 1911 under $600 and it was $20 more than the Taurus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
XDTalk 500 Member
|
How old is your Loaded? The one's I've seen at the local shop are as tight as a steel drum. Both the Parkerized and stainless I checked had no real play in the fit, and the stainless had absolutely no play at all in anything. It was the tightest 1911 I'd ever seen, which actually turns me away from it and towards the parkerized, but hey .45 is expensive and I'm not patient enough to wait 1,000 rounds for it to break in.
__________________
I pray for the post-apocalyptic world to come soon. Providing for my family without the monkeys on my back is a rewarding prospect... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
XDTalk 5K Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 9,177
|
I feel the same way about my stainless GI. It is VERY well put together for a lower level 1911. The slide to frame fit is still tight after 5 years of shooting. The finish is even and has no blemises. Everyting blends together really well on the back of the slide/frame and it had no rough edges or machining marks anywhere on the outside.
This is the main reason I bought the GI stainless. I was actually in the gunstore to look for anohter good used Colt 1911, but examined the stainless GI and liked what I saw for the price of 439 bucks, so it followed me home. Turned out...it was every bit as accurate as my two Colts and alot more reliable. The only ammo that my GI bobbles are the alloy cased Blazers, but I have known of several 1911s that don't like the light alloy cases because the lightweight cases mess with the timing and give ejection jams now and then. With every other type of round - the GI has been flawless. Yep...I agree...the GI/Mil-Spec Springers are VERY good guns for the money spent. Handsome, well finished pieces, too. I will be keeping mine. Its too good to trade away! - Brickboy240
__________________
The top 25% of wage earners in America pay 86% of all federal income taxes collected. (according to 2007 IRS website data) Es mejor morir a pie que vivir arrodillado Volvo...the Swedish Brick! |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|