|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| XDTalk Memberships | Gold Sponsorships | XDTalk Sponsors | XDTalk Pro Logo Shop | Photo Gallery | Wiki | ChatBox |
|
Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-13-2007, 06:03 PM
|
#1 |
|
XDTalk 1K Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,192
|
Blade-Tech UCH versus Comp-tac Shirt Tucker
Blade-Tech UCH versus Comp-tac Shirt Tucker
These two holsters appear to be almost identical. Any experiences/suggestions/preferences? For example, any reason why one or the other would be preferable for a subcompact? |
|
    
|
|
01-15-2007, 08:38 AM
|
#2 |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fruitland, Idaho
Posts: 265
|
I own the UCH. The key to these type of holsters is a good belt. The UCH is the only IWB holster I own. I don't like it, it is unconfortable to me. I don't see much of a difference in the Shirt Tucker. These aren't really an adjustable cant holster. You can force a cant, by tweaking it in your wasteband.
I am going to order a CTAC to see if the support front and back makes my packing experiance any better. If it doesn't, than I am too picky and not meant to pack IWB 
__________________
Earth First! We'll log the other Planets later! |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
