US 3yr-old Finds Handgun, Shoots Policeman Father, Dad Sues Gun Maker - Page 2 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!

afmo · 07-10-2008, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newKid

i believe that there is a law that prevents this sort of lawsuit. . .

and Glock has a lot of money for lawyers. . .

yeah, Glock is huge...as the saying goes, you can't fight city hall. This guy is probably looking for a quick settlement and has no real intentions of going to court...i expect it will be dropped when glock shows up to court...

oldfart · 07-10-2008, 11:28 AM

The real stupidity is that some money grubbing lawler took the case and there will be some fool judge that will hear it vs throwing it out.

Ummmm, me thinks a well trained ahem.......professional police officer should know that loaded guns are dangerous, all the safety features AND SAFE HANDLING PRACTICES and take some PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Where is Judge Judy when we need some common sense?

Fish609 · 07-10-2008, 11:29 AM

The kid should have aimed higher. What a piece of ****.

yeahYeah · 07-10-2008, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldfart

The real stupidity is that some money grubbing lawler took the case and there will be some fool judge that will hear it vs throwing it out.

Ummmm, me thinks a well trained ahem.......professional police officer should know that loaded guns are dangerous, all the safety features AND SAFE HANDLING PRACTICES and take some PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Where is Judge Judy when we need some common sense?

this is a "gun" we're talking about here. a vast majority of the country thinks guns have minds of their own. the cop isn't at fault here, it's the evil gun, placed loaded, in the back seat next to a child.

JRH · 07-10-2008, 11:36 AM

Why the hell was his gun on the backseat? Why did he let his kid have access to the backseat when he had a firearm there?

Isn't there probably a law in Kalifornia about leaving a firearm unattended or accessible to minors, or is that just one of the things on the wish list still. He's likely ot end up with a suit against him for negligence and child endangerment.

MagicPie · 07-10-2008, 11:41 AM

Sounds like the guy deserved getting shot, the chances the kid would of instead shot himself are the same. Extreme irresponsibility deserves extreme punishment.

yeahYeah · 07-10-2008, 11:41 AM

put the responsibility where it belongs, not on the anti-gunner scape goats known as the NRA and gun manufacturers.

**XDONBOARD** · 07-10-2008, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish609

The kid should have aimed higher. What a piece of ****.

The guy should be happy it was a glock and not an XD, then he wouldn't be around to sue.

In an exclusive interview, the toddler said he aimed for the head but was not used to the grip angle.

**Liquid Rhino** · 07-10-2008, 01:15 PM

**TacoMalo** · 07-10-2008, 01:36 PM

Three words.... W T F ????????

07-10-2008, 11:36 AM	#15
JRH XDTalk 1K Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: North East Ohio Posts: 1,161	Why the hell was his gun on the backseat? Why did he let his kid have access to the backseat when he had a firearm there? Isn't there probably a law in Kalifornia about leaving a firearm unattended or accessible to minors, or is that just one of the things on the wish list still. He's likely ot end up with a suit against him for negligence and child endangerment. __________________ Last, but by no means least, courage--moral courage, the courage of one's convictions, the courage to see things through. The world is in a constant conspiracy against the brave. It's the age-old struggle--the roar of the crowd on one side and the voice of your conscience on the other. -Douglas MacArthur

07-10-2008, 11:41 AM	#16
MagicPie XDTalk 100 Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: The only good state-TX Posts: 246	Sounds like the guy deserved getting shot, the chances the kid would of instead shot himself are the same. Extreme irresponsibility deserves extreme punishment. __________________ N/A

07-10-2008, 11:41 AM	#17
yeahYeah XDTalk 10K Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Vegas Posts: 10,771	put the responsibility where it belongs, not on the anti-gunner scape goats known as the NRA and gun manufacturers. __________________ MOΛΩN ΛABÉ "You got on British Knights and I ain't seen anyone wear those since 1987" - Red (Pineapple Express) Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who comes near that precious jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. When you give up that force, you are ruined. ~ Patrick Henry

07-10-2008, 01:15 PM	#19
Liquid Rhino XDTalk 1K Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: three\|zero\|five Posts: 1,037	__________________ WARNING! There ain't no more continues, dog...

07-10-2008, 01:36 PM	#20
TacoMalo XDTalk 1K Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: South Texas Posts: 1,868	Three words.... W T F ???????? __________________ http://www.morecowbell.dj/ "I drink diet coke so I can eat regular cake!" Gabriel Iglesias 2007

07-10-2008, 11:28 AM	#12
oldfart XDTalk 500 Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 531	The real stupidity is that some money grubbing lawler took the case and there will be some fool judge that will hear it vs throwing it out. Ummmm, me thinks a well trained ahem.......professional police officer should know that loaded guns are dangerous, all the safety features AND SAFE HANDLING PRACTICES and take some PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY Where is Judge Judy when we need some common sense?

07-10-2008, 11:29 AM	#13
Fish609 XDTalk 1K Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: NW Indiana Posts: 1,471	The kid should have aimed higher. What a piece of ****.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode