XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
 

Go Back   XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! > Main Room > Gun Policy News (RSS Feed)
Register Forum Rules Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
XDTalk Memberships Gold Sponsorships XDTalk Sponsors XDTalk Pro Logo Shop Photo Gallery Wiki ChatBox


Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

*** Registration also removes the In-Text Advertising when viewing threads on XDTalk! ***

Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2008, 01:50 AM   #1
XDTalk Robot News Feed
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,537
'At Last, Gun Rules We Can All Agree On,' Says Group of 300 US Mayors

Finally. After decades of ideological debates over the meaning of every word and comma contained in the U.S. Constitution's one-sentence Second Amendment, the Supreme Court has issued a ruling that should largely settle the matter. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the court found that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to bear arms, while also affirming the constitutionality... [Wall Street Journal, Opinion, via gunpolicy.org ]

More...
XDTalk RSS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 06:17 AM   #2
XDTalk 100 Member
 
TexicanKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by XDTalk RSS View Post
Finally. After decades of ideological debates over the meaning of every word and comma contained in the U.S. Constitution's one-sentence Second Amendment, the Supreme Court has issued a ruling that should largely settle the matter. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the court found that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to bear arms, while also affirming the constitutionality... [Wall Street Journal, Opinion, via gunpolicy.org ]

More...
They always talk about closing the "gunshow loophole". Heck, I call that the "freedom loophole", the one loophole which allows free men and women to freely purchase firearms for defense of self and freedom.

When that loophole closes, all persons will have to kneel before government in order to request the opportunity to purchase their own protection.
__________________
XD9 Sub carried 2:00
Walking Cane (for style)

"We have Law Pollution. Legislators continue to create and pass laws until they pile up and up and up like some giant garbage pile of obscure code, creating a legal minefield all should fear to tread."
TexicanKid is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 06:49 AM   #3
XDTalk 100 Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 194
"I call that the "freedom loophole"
True!
__________________
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
Bobby Schulz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 08:26 AM   #4
XDTalk 10K Member
 
Krackels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 18,708
Blog Entries: 5
Send a message via MSN to Krackels Send a message via Yahoo to Krackels
Quote:
Every day, 34 Americans are murdered with a firearm. That's the equivalent of a Virginia Tech massacre. And like the Virginia Tech killer, most murderers purchase or possess their guns in violation of federal law. Our bipartisan coalition of mayors has identified four key reforms that would fix the federal government's primary tool for preventing illegal gun sales: the background check system.

- Close the gun-show loophole. Currently, licensed gun dealers are required to run criminal background checks on all buyers, but a loophole in the law enables criminals to avoid these checks if they buy from "occasional sellers" who don't have federal licenses. These unlicensed sellers, who often operate at gun shows, shoot a hole through the background-check system that allows criminals to purchase guns. That is why the major presidential candidates have called for this gun show loophole to be closed.

- End gun-dealer fire sales. If the federal government shuts down gun dealers for selling illegally, it nevertheless allows those dealers to sell off their inventory without conducting the background checks that it normally requires them to do. Imagine if a liquor store was shut down for selling to minors. Would anyone support a policy that would allow the owner to sell off all the remaining liquor without checking IDs? Of course not.

- Require gun dealers to do background checks on employees. Under the current law, if a person can't buy guns – because he or she has a criminal or mental-illness record – that person cannot sell guns, either. But the law fails to require dealers to conduct background checks on their employees, even though they already have background-check machines in their stores.

- Close the "terror gap." If the federal government can prevent a potentially dangerous person from getting on a plane, shouldn't it also be able to prevent that person from buying guns? Last year, the Bush administration endorsed a bill that will close the terror gap. Congress should make it law this year.
Recently, our coalition of mayors commissioned a bipartisan public opinion poll to ask Americans what they thought of these four ideas. In each case, more than 80% of Americans – including more than 80% of gun owners – stated their support. This is the vast middle ground shared by mayors across the country, and now that the Supreme Court has swept aside the old ideological debate, the only question remaining is whether Congress has the courage to join us.

Mr. Bloomberg is the mayor of New York City. Mr. Menino is the mayor of Boston. They are the founding co-chairs of Mayors Against Illegal Guns, Mayors Against Illegal Guns.
They're all put forward with good intentions and I have to say that they all seem like a good idea, except for the "gun-show loophole". I can't speak for any other state, but in PA if you buy a gun from a dealer you will fill out the 4473 (plus the PA State Police registration if it's a handgun) and go through the normal background checks, but if you buy a firearm from an individual you don't need to do an official transfer according to the law (the exception is handguns, which according to the state law must always be transfered).

Personally, I don't see the private sale of firearms to be a real problem at gun shows. In my thinking, if people sell a handgun illegally at a gun show they're probably the same people that will sell a handgun illegally elsewhere.

And on a side-note, I've never heard of a gun dealer fire sale. It sounds neat. makes me think that I could get a bunch of goodies for severely marked down prices.

Also, I don't think being on a government watch list should disqualify you from purchasing and owning firearms. The law provides a good number of provisions that would exempt a good number of folks from legally purchasing firearms, and I'm not sure that adding one more would be wise or necessary.
__________________
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." --Benjamin Franklin
America's Third Parties --- Duping the Foolish and Idealistic since 1832.


PA Roll Call .................... My Blog


Last edited by Krackels : 07-01-2008 at 09:40 AM.
Krackels is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 11:47 AM   #5
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Yuppicide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Get outta my way! Can't you see I'm from East Bay? -NOFX
Posts: 1,362
As for the "Gun-show Loophole" that's an EASY FIX:

Background Checks for Firearm sales & Transfers should be FREE.

Unlicensed occasional sellers should be able to choose whether or not to run the person they are selling to through a backgound check.

....But, IF YOU DECIDE NOT TO RUN A FREE BACKGROUND CHECK, and it can be PROVEN that the person you sold to was barred from legally owning a Firearm (at the time of sales) -It should be a FELONY and Minimun of 2 Years in jail for Each firearm sold.

I think that's Fair.
__________________
"Tired of being bossed around
Getting the run around
Sweep your floors
Empty your trash
You're the one who makes the cash
Tired of being a piss ant
9 to 5
Open my letter
You won't be alive
Here's a present just for you
When you'll open it
You'll be through..."
(Letter Bomb)
-The Circle Jerks
Yuppicide is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 12:15 PM   #6
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Sirius1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pacific NorthWET (Seattle)
Posts: 1,046
Quote:
Every day, 34 Americans are murdered with a firearm. That's the equivalent of a Virginia Tech massacre. And like the Virginia Tech killer, most murderers purchase or possess their guns in violation of federal law. Our bipartisan coalition of mayors has identified four key reforms that would fix the federal government's primary tool for preventing illegal gun sales: the background check system.

I know I have bad short-term memory, but didn't they determine that he didn't break any laws? I thought they determined that he had mental issues, but was never commited or he wasn't "ordered to seek help" or something like that. Seems he passed the b/g check that was in place at the time.



ETA: I mean he didn't break any laws BEFORE he started shooting...
__________________
You don’t win anything in a gunfight, you just get to keep what you have.
The loudest sound in the world is a “click” when you need a “bang.”
The second loudest sound in the world is a “bang” when you were expecting a “click.”
Sirius1963 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 12:35 PM   #7
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuppicide View Post
As for the "Gun-show Loophole" that's an EASY FIX:

Background Checks for Firearm sales & Transfers should be FREE.

Unlicensed occasional sellers should be able to choose whether or not to run the person they are selling to through a backgound check.

....But, IF YOU DECIDE NOT TO RUN A FREE BACKGROUND CHECK, and it can be PROVEN that the person you sold to was barred from legally owning a Firearm (at the time of sales) -It should be a FELONY and Minimun of 2 Years in jail for Each firearm sold.

I think that's Fair.
Not a bad idea. In Missouri if an esblishment that servers alcohol serves a person who is already drunk, they are liable if that person leaves their establishment and injures or kills another.

Likewise, police officers (and their departments) have been held liable when an officer stopped a motorist, let the motorist go, when that motorist drove further down the road and had and accident and was found to be intoxicated.

If you sell a firearm to an individual without checking to make sure they are legally able to possess a firearm, should you also not be liable?

Does seem to make sense.
__________________
XD9sc
digitalexplr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:26 PM   #8
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Reno82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alaska
Posts: 1,126
Send a message via ICQ to Reno82 Send a message via Yahoo to Reno82
+1 with Yuppicide. Good idea.
__________________
**********
XD-45acp Service (Match Gun I changed it to a compact for CCW... did a grip chop on it)
Ruger Mark III 22/45
Taurus PT145 MillPro (Home Defense & CCW)
Kimber SS Custom Target II 10mm
Walther G22 (FUN GUN)
XD-45acp Tactical (Match Gun II; upgraded the bbl from PistolGear)
XD-9 Sub-Compact (Home Defense and CCW)
DPMS AR-15: 9mm (1/17/08...)
RRA CAR A4 Upper 223/5.56---did a lower bulid 6/3/08 and bought completed upper 2/21/08
**in order of purchases***
Reno82 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:51 PM   #9
XDTalk 3K Member
 
Ishpeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,715
Send a message via ICQ to Ishpeck Send a message via AIM to Ishpeck Send a message via MSN to Ishpeck Send a message via Yahoo to Ishpeck
I love how this article pretends these fifteen mayors somehow have more authority than the gajillions of other mayors elected by gajillions of other people in the country.
__________________
You could have Satan running on the Republican ticket, Hitler in the Democratic party, and Jesus Christ Himself as the Libertarian Candidate and many "Christians" would be distraught over their voting options.
http://me.ishpeck.net/index.php?P=2020_vision
Ishpeck is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:57 PM   #10
XDTalk 500 Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 528
I think we can agree that there are a bunch of mayors who need to be sent packing next election!
__________________
XD9sc
digitalexplr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:22 PM.


 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Daniel Kao DBA XDTalk & Kao Holdings