US Supreme Court Ensures Even More Americans Will Die by Gunshot - Page 2 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!

Spawnz · 06-27-2008, 03:19 PM

I wouldn't even wipe my A$$ with the NY Times. Even more Americans will die by gunshot? Maybe for once it will be the low life scum dying and not the decent law abiding citizens! Screw the NY Times. Their Motto is: "Never let the true facts get in the way of a good story".

oldfart · 06-27-2008, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jtkratzer

Whoever wrote this garbage should lose his/her job; not because I disagree with his/her views, but the content is so factually incorrect and bastardized, it's unbelievable. I'm just shaking my head when I read this. Rights aren't absolute, rights aren't guaranteed, the right to bear arms is "clearly" linked to military service, etc. etc. etc.

The author is truly clueless and a bumbling idiot. Where do papers like the NY Times find these morons?

+1
Just one more reason not to read that rag and all the other so called news agencies crap they try to feed the public these days. Scary isn't it?

OMG there will be blood in the streets now that everyone has the RIGHT to have a firearm in their home. We are all going to die. Give me a break.

I can't figure out the logic here. Ummmm, we banned all guns because we had such high crime in Washington DC THIRTY TWO F#(*#$*(#( in years ago. Guess what, they have higher crime now. Ya know it's about time they figure out their great experiment FAILED.

My only regret over the ruling is that Charlton Heston did not live long enough to see it happen.

Broadside · 06-27-2008, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldfart

+1
Just one more reason not to read that rag and all the other so called news agencies crap they try to feed the public these days. Scary isn't it?

OMG there will be blood in the streets now that everyone has the RIGHT to have a firearm in their home. We are all going to die. Give me a break.

I can't figure out the logic here. Ummmm, we banned all guns because we had such high crime in Washington DC THIRTY TWO F#(*#$*(#( in years ago. Guess what, they have higher crime now. Ya know it's about time they figure out their great experiment FAILED.

My only regret over the ruling is that Charlton Heston did not live long enough to see it happen.

+1000000000

Let's reciprocate what they tried to do to CCW/CHL holders. All we need to do now is publish the addresses of those who don't own firearms and we'll see how long they last.

Amkus · 06-27-2008, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ishpeck

This may be my best work ever.
Everything Short of Nukes:*NYT Is My Plaything

These articles are too much fun.

"Notice to readers: Please ignore the proportion of 250million versus thirty thousand (mentioned in the first sentence of this article). You might get a sense for how small the number of "gun crimes" is compared to the number of actual guns circulating. All you need to do to properly understand this article is see big numbers and know that they mean big scary."

It's funny because it's true.

Jack the Toad · 06-27-2008, 03:57 PM

All of that crap is what Hussein Obama believes. Look at his Illinois Senate voting record. He will work to appoint Justices (the next Pres. will probably appoint2 maybe 3) to the court that will quickly overturn the current ruling. 1 more liberal judge on the court and a new case will pop up to overturn this ruling.

**Fennellco** · 06-27-2008, 03:58 PM

Just when you thought society had a chance you go and read the comments on this story and WOW

Lock and Load - Readers' Comments - The New York Times

StevePVB · 06-27-2008, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jtkratzer

Whoever wrote this garbage should lose his/her job; not because I disagree with his/her views, but the content is so factually incorrect and bastardized, it's unbelievable. I'm just shaking my head when I read this. Rights aren't absolute, rights aren't guaranteed, the right to bear arms is "clearly" linked to military service, etc. etc. etc.

The author is truly clueless and a bumbling idiot. Where do papers like the NY Times find these morons?

You missed the point

Being a clueless and bumbling idiot is exactly why he is qualified to work at the NYT. Rather than lose his job I'm sure they reqrded him with nice pay raise.

mp3mogul · 06-27-2008, 05:30 PM

Yeah, I read last night (wish I could remember the percentages) that since D.C. put into place the ban on handguns, violent crime and murder both have risen sharply!!!

Ajaxx89 · 06-27-2008, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digitalexplr

They forget to mention the fact that since the D.C. gun ban went into effect, D.C. has become one of the most dangerous cities in the country.

The editorial staff of the New York Times needs to be drug tested.

This ruling puts the criminals in D.C. on notice. Law abiding D.C. residents will now be able to excersie their constitutional right to bear arms. Let's see what D.C,s crime rate looks like in says 5 years from this date.

dray · 06-27-2008, 10:14 PM

You know, I just had a epiphany. The one thing in common with these anti's is that they want absolute control. They want the high crime and plentiful victims (among other things) to maintain their power over the people.

This is why they are so scared of a legally armed population. exactly why the 2nd was written in the first place.

06-27-2008, 03:58 PM	#16
Fennellco XDTalk 100 Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 486	Just when you thought society had a chance you go and read the comments on this story and WOW Lock and Load - Readers' Comments - The New York Times __________________ Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. - Henry Lewis Mencken, 1880 - 1956

06-27-2008, 05:30 PM	#18
mp3mogul XDTalk 500 Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Salem, Virginia Posts: 667	Yeah, I read last night (wish I could remember the percentages) that since D.C. put into place the ban on handguns, violent crime and murder both have risen sharply!!! __________________ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety. Nor, are they likely to end up with either. Benjamin Franklin

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

06-27-2008, 03:19 PM	#11
Spawnz XDTalk 500 Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: OHIO Posts: 856	I wouldn't even wipe my A$$ with the NY Times. Even more Americans will die by gunshot? Maybe for once it will be the low life scum dying and not the decent law abiding citizens! Screw the NY Times. Their Motto is: "Never let the true facts get in the way of a good story".

06-27-2008, 03:57 PM	#15
Jack the Toad XDTalk 100 Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Southern Illinois Posts: 159	All of that crap is what Hussein Obama believes. Look at his Illinois Senate voting record. He will work to appoint Justices (the next Pres. will probably appoint2 maybe 3) to the court that will quickly overturn the current ruling. 1 more liberal judge on the court and a new case will pop up to overturn this ruling.

06-27-2008, 10:14 PM	#20
dray XDTalk 100 Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: NE FL Posts: 149	You know, I just had a epiphany. The one thing in common with these anti's is that they want absolute control. They want the high crime and plentiful victims (among other things) to maintain their power over the people. This is why they are so scared of a legally armed population. exactly why the 2nd was written in the first place.