![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| XDTalk Memberships | Gold Sponsorships | XDTalk Sponsors | XDTalk Pro Logo Shop | Photo Gallery | Wiki | ChatBox |
|
Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 242
|
Who is the best?
I am getting ready to have some XD work done. From those of you who have seen both, who does a better trigger/action job? Barsto or Canyon Creek? Who has better .357 barrels? Barsto or EFK. I am leaning in favor of Barsto so that I can do one stop shopping. But nothing is written in stone. I don't have a problem getting the work and barrels from different places if the quality is superior or if the quality is equal but the price is right.
ranburr |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
XDTalk Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 39
|
Canyon Creek definately gets my vote. Rich knows more about the xd than springfield armory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 242
|
Anyone else?
ranburr |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
XDTalk 5K Member
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 7,629
|
Barsto can not touch Rich's work on the XD, there is no comparsion.
Personally, I consider EFK barrels a better value. They are made in the USA (Arizona) and use a high-quality SS. This coupled with a life-time warranty is pretty good, plus they are $50 less than Barsto.
__________________
Visit www.pistolgear.com for all of your XD needs! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
XDTalk Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sidney MT
Posts: 15
|
trigger / barrel questions to Old School
to OldSchool !
Because you have expressed your opinion re: Rich's work vs: Barsto's work, could you be a bit more specific about your opinions/comparisons? I am definitely in NEED of some trigger work, but have always preferred to do my own (on 1911's). Now that I have the variety of XD's, I want to experience 'the best' but also want to be able to do it. So, again, my question - how do you compare their work as to pre-travel, over-travel weight-of-pull, crispness, cost or whatever else you might throw into the descriptions of trigger pull. As for the barrels, maybe you have more specifics? Accuracy? Function? Fit? [I should mention I have not yet and maybe am not capable of doing a fair comparison of stock vs. Barsto vs. EFK barrels, even tho I have an example of each. My only comment via experience is my Barsto 9mm Tactical barrel conversion has the tightest chamber of ANY of my many 9mm guns ... EVER! Read that as H.Q. gunsmithing ... but it's causing jams with my Dillon reloads that, after 100+M's of rounds, have ALWAYS functioned in dozens of other chambers. I will try to remember to do an 'accuracy' test with each and report back.] I'd really appreciate your comments. Thanks! ~ E Mont |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 205
|
Rich of Canyon Creek gets my vote
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|