Anyone have an FN 5-7 and PS90?

[Groo]

Originally Posted by billee

blah blah M4 blah 22 blah blah blah 35gr 9mm blah blah....

You do realize that neither your powder-puff 9mm or your 22lr shooting M4 clone stands a chance of penetrating the doubled up trauma plates worn my your Arch-Nemesis that prevented you from deflowering the Mayor's Son.

[Madhouse]

Originally Posted by billee

... and all bullpups are seriously weak in the sense that you can't fire them from the weak side shoulder. You don't get to choose which side of cover you have to fire around, quite often and firing from the right shoulder around the left side of cover forces you to expose your entire torso, whereas if you fired from the left shouder, only your head and shoulder are exposed. ...

Now, I'm not trying to call out your logic here, but the PS-90 is completely ambidextrous. Ambidextrous charging handle, selector switch at the trigger, brass drops from the bottom, etc. It can truly be fired from either shoulder exactly the same. Wait, maybe I am calling out your logic...

Not that I'm out there performing black ops or engaging in CQB battles, by any means.

[Buffman]

Originally Posted by billee

The 5.7 pistol is grossly overpriced, as is the ammo. Check out RBCD and MAGSAFE ammo, for 2200 fps 9mm loads. Even at $2 a shot for such rds, you only need 100 of them. the savings of 50c a shot for practice ammo and the very high cost of the 5.7 pistol make it a poor choice, really.

2200 FPS.. From what, superlight weight, Frangible rounds, that are going to make flesh wounds... WOW>. Fastest 5.7 ammo from the pistol is 2600 FPS.. No one ever said it was more powerful/accurate than 5.56/.223..

[Zombie Hunter]

[QUOTE=billee;2934750]I think it's seriously inferior to the M4, in many ways, QUOTE]

This was meant to be a contest between the two. I already own an AR and AR pistol that share 5.56, this would be in addition to.

[chupacabrachus]

They're not for me.

[sonnygtsi]

Dang SRD that's a nice collection you have there!!

[Zombie Hunter]

Originally Posted by billee

so why would you want a rd LESS powerful than 223, that costs more and in a gun with less proven combat options than the M4, hmm?

Why do you care? I could ask you why you want a little baby round like the .223 when real men use a .308 or bigger? You should get a battle proven rifle like the M1 and actually be able to reach out and touch some one!

I enjoy all types of guns, my life doesn't depend on these rifles or handguns back home. I use them at the range in practice and compete with some of them in pistol and 3 gun matches.

Again this isn't an either/or, I can have both....and then some!

[ryr8828]

Since I posted in this thread last time I've put up some ar500 steel targets, one at 100 yds and one at 140 yds.

I can hit both of these targets with both my fiveseven pistol and my ps90, and there isn't much bullet drop at these ranges.

I usually shoot at these with 5.45x39, 5.56x45, and 7.62x39, and not much with the 5.7 round since it costs more.

I don't think anyone wants to be shot with this round at 100 yds so I laugh at anyone who says it's underpowered.

[DDay87]

Originally Posted by Madhouse

Now, I'm not trying to call out your logic here, but the PS-90 is completely ambidextrous. Ambidextrous charging handle, selector switch at the trigger, brass drops from the bottom, etc. It can truly be fired from either shoulder exactly the same. Wait, maybe I am calling out your logic...

Not that I'm out there performing black ops or engaging in CQB battles, by any means.

I have seen videos of people firing the full auto variant with one hand and still hitting the target well,

As for me I like the P90 but the PS90 I don't want just because of the barrel I could see myself snagging that on every tree branch and bush on my property, I'm looking at the FS2000 because of the common magazines and I already have a crap-load of .223