Talk to me about optics now - Page 4 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!

**KingAirDriver** · 12-11-2007, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish609

Here is a link to the site.

http://www.cmore.com/tactical.html

You gotta admit, that just looks bad a**. Try a search on google for more sweet pictures.

Damn dude, you're right, that looks pretty freakin' cool! I like the looks of that better than both the Eotech and Aimpoint. You say you really like yours? How does it compare to the Eo and Aimpoint? You're right, it is pricy, but after you buy a mount for either of the other two then you're already at the price of this, too. Do you have the CTAC or TAC model? Know the difference between them? The website seems a little limited.

Fish609 · 12-11-2007, 09:09 AM

I like mine. I got it from webarms.com for around $350 with shipping. The guy I talked to, Bill, was a heck of a nice guy.

The cheaper one is polymer construction and the more expensive one is aluminium construction. I have the polymer.

Unfortunatly, I don't have any experience with the other brands of red dots to compare to the C-more.

Here are some pros and cons of the c-more:

PRO
- Solid construction
- Adjustable MOA dot (with a new chip, less than $30)
- Sweet look
- Battery lasts for days (I left mine on once ><, they dont last 2 months haha)
- Has mutiple brightness settings, even low-light and NV settings (need NV goggles to see it)
- Smaller apeture so you can see more target
- Easily mounts right to the top of your A3/4 style rail
- Has a standard rear AR/M16 iron sight that can be used while looking THROUGH the glass. (read: Fail proof dependability even if the lens is broken in combat)

CON
- Expensive
- Smaller red dot viewing area than other brands
- Wouldn't look as good on a G36 or other cool gun
- No magnification

I need to make an account on photobucket and I'll post some pics!

**mvician** · 12-11-2007, 04:46 PM

I have a carry handle version of the C-More, the Scout. I bought it for one of my A1 uppers. The C-More is "old school" and a better choice of sight would be the EOTech or the Aimpont for a flat top AR. It does what I need it to do, but if I had it to do over I would have passed on it.

12-11-2007, 04:46 PM	#33
mvician XDTalk 3K Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: NW Indiana Posts: 3,333	I have a carry handle version of the C-More, the Scout. I bought it for one of my A1 uppers. The C-More is "old school" and a better choice of sight would be the EOTech or the Aimpont for a flat top AR. It does what I need it to do, but if I had it to do over I would have passed on it. __________________ AR15s...ya I've built more than a few http://www.xdtalk.com/forums/ar-talk...ar-family.html ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-11-2007, 09:09 AM	#32
Fish609 XDTalk 1K Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: NW Indiana Posts: 1,260	I like mine. I got it from webarms.com for around $350 with shipping. The guy I talked to, Bill, was a heck of a nice guy. The cheaper one is polymer construction and the more expensive one is aluminium construction. I have the polymer. Unfortunatly, I don't have any experience with the other brands of red dots to compare to the C-more. Here are some pros and cons of the c-more: PRO - Solid construction - Adjustable MOA dot (with a new chip, less than $30) - Sweet look - Battery lasts for days (I left mine on once ><, they dont last 2 months haha) - Has mutiple brightness settings, even low-light and NV settings (need NV goggles to see it) - Smaller apeture so you can see more target - Easily mounts right to the top of your A3/4 style rail - Has a standard rear AR/M16 iron sight that can be used while looking THROUGH the glass. (read: Fail proof dependability even if the lens is broken in combat) CON - Expensive - Smaller red dot viewing area than other brands - Wouldn't look as good on a G36 or other cool gun - No magnification I need to make an account on photobucket and I'll post some pics!