![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| XDTalk Memberships | Gold Sponsorships | XDTalk Sponsors | XDTalk Pro Logo Shop | Photo Gallery | Wiki | ChatBox |
|
Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
XDTalk 1K Member
|
To answer your question, wolf is the cheapest .223
Some say its dirtier so they dont like it but they willingly eat a grilled steak rather than a pan fried one. No question which one is dirtier.
__________________
I.C.E. Hotline 866-347-2423 Toll free call to report illegal immigrants |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
XDTalk 500 Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 599
|
Just because an ammo brand is cheap does NOT necessarily mean that it is good. For plinking, use Winchester, Remington or at least a proven name brand. They will have a consistent factory load. Unless you can verify maker's specs, stay away from the generic boxed brands (reloads) or the clean up and diminished accuracy rate may very well frustrate you. Wolf ammo is O.K. in a beater gun but stick with brass cased cartridges if you have a lot of money invested in your firearm. This will allow you the option to either sell, reload or recycle the old brass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
XDTalk 1K Member
|
I used to use Wolf ammo all the time for the cheapest around factor. It worked fine for plinkin holes in cans and the like, but it would get very dirty. Also after some rapid fire....it would always jam. The green coating stuff would kinda melt off the casings, and gum up the bolt....makin it not feed or eject correctly. You'd have to take out the mag, and weasel the stuck round(s) out, and then reload. I don't think Wolf is that bad as far as havin to worry about the casings blowin apart or anything of that nature, but have read posts on ar-15.com about how the steel casings can cause firing pin or extractor damage after many rounds. After finding all of that out....I stopped using it. A broken extrator or firing pin is just another bleh to worry about. I still have several hundred rounds of the stuff stashed for when I run out of the "good stuff"
However, after shooting the real mccoy....ya won't like shooting anything else. The bang is just too cool!
__________________
\"Through strength, we deter tyranny\" ICVM OD XD-40 4\" Black on black XD-9 4\" |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 109
|
Wolf is cheap...and dirty.
I shoot the factory re-loads (canned heat) from Georgia-arms.com. I like the 55gr stuff....1000 rounds at a time. Never had a problem, they always use quality brass, etc. Nice folks too!! My RRA loves it! Lex in NC |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
XDTalk 500 Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
+1. What's on the lower doesn't matter; check the barrel markings to see what it's chambered for. It should be clearly marked. My Bushmaster Superlight has '5.56 NATO 1/9' stamped on the barrel just forward of the front sight base. 5.56mm is a little looser than .223. You can shoot .223 just fine in a rifle chambered for 5.56, but not the other way around. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
XDTalk 1K Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 1,701
|
The differnce between .223 Rem and the 5.56 is the 5.56 more or less like a +P round made for the military.
its not recomended shooting the 5.56 Nato round threw anything other than M16/ar15's because they where designed to handle the pressures. i read the Mini 14 can handle the rounds also. no im assuming since they where designed to handle the 5.56 round most of these rifles can handle the .223 Rem with no problem i shoot both 5.56 and .223 threw my mini 15 and it digests them with no problem all. And the AR being a far superiour weapon compared to the mini 14 i wouldnt see why it would have a problem with normal .223 rounds.
__________________
____________________________ NEF 20 Guage Parder Model (single shot) S&W 642 .38 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
No. The difference isn't in the ammo, it's in the chamber size. http://www.ammo-oracle.com/body.htm#diff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
XDTalk 1K Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 1,701
|
the 5.56 is slightly larger right ?
__________________
____________________________ NEF 20 Guage Parder Model (single shot) S&W 642 .38 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
XDTalk 100 Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
Correct. The link shows the actual dimensions. The .223 chamber is tighter, which makes it more accurate, but can be less reliable under field conditions. The looser 5.56 chamber gives up a little accuracy for reliability. (The Wylde chamber claims to combine the best of both.) 5.56mm ammo is likely (though not necessarily) loaded hotter than .223, which can cause problems (overpressure) when fired in the .223 chamber. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|