XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
 

Go Back   XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! > Armory Central > The Ammo Can
Register Forum Rules Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
XDTalk Memberships Gold Sponsorships XDTalk Sponsors XDTalk Pro Logo Shop Photo Gallery Wiki ChatBox


Welcome to the XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

*** Registration also removes the In-Text Advertising when viewing threads on XDTalk! ***

Also, registering gets you started on gaining access to The Trading Post and Blogs after 30 days and 100 posts! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-18-2007, 04:09 PM   #1
XDTalk 100 Member
 
BMFOTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 309
Post Fast vs. Slow Ammo

I have been trying to read up on all the information on ammo available for my XD Compact .45. What I have been able to understand is that a person can either use a heavy slow round or a light fast round for personal defense. Does anyone know which round will penetrate through heavy clothing the best and reliably?
I have tested Speer Gold Dot 200gr +p rounds (because I think +p mean the powder will burn faster and shot more reliably out of my XD 4" barrel) Winchester SXT 230 gr and Federal Hydrashock 165gr.
I have yet to test Federal Hydrashock 230gr, Remington Golden Saber( all sizes), Cor Bon or Triton ammo.
Any suggestion on personal defense ammo is appreciated.
I am sure this question has been asked many times so if someone can tell me how to such the forum I would appreciate that also.
BMFOTP is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 04:17 PM   #2
XDTalk 4K Member
 
Ishpeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,292
Send a message via ICQ to Ishpeck Send a message via AIM to Ishpeck Send a message via MSN to Ishpeck Send a message via Yahoo to Ishpeck
It really doesn't matter as much as you might expect. Just be prepared to empty your magazine on somebody who doesn't go down after the first shot.
__________________
If I were to ask you a hypothetical question, what would you want it to be about?
http://www.ishpeck.net/
Ishpeck is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 04:53 PM   #3
XDTalk 1K Member
 
lobster_roboto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,725
Send a message via AIM to lobster_roboto
I prefer 185 grain +p golden sabers in my XDcompact just because I have HEARD from multiple sources that even the best hollow point rounds tend not to expand unless they are going around 1000fps or faster.

I can not confirm nor deny this but I am just going to go with it.
I got a good deal on the sabers and they feed and function spot on in the XD.


Ultimately like ishpeck said... It really doesn't matter just be prepared to put some more holes in an attacker who keeps coming.
__________________
"Let's go straight to the source and ban crime"
lobster_roboto is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 05:01 PM   #4
XDTalk 100 Member
 
portsider44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lubbock Texas
Posts: 132
not to hijack, just wondering if the 185 or 200 gr have lower felt recoil?
portsider44 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 05:06 PM   #5
XDTalk 100 Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 199
THose gold dots are actually IMHO the best blend of weight and speed in a .45. Lower grain weights are lighter recoiling but usually much faster which cuts out some of it to but if you get a mild speed load with a light bullet it will be light recoiling
__________________
" If you dont have anything nice to say...You must be talkin about Hillary Clinton." Jeff Foxworthy
pinpointshot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 05:11 PM   #6
XDTalk 1K Member
 
RobFMJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Galveston, Texas
Posts: 1,955
Send a message via ICQ to RobFMJ Send a message via AIM to RobFMJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by portsider44 View Post
not to hijack, just wondering if the 185 or 200 gr have lower felt recoil?
If the loads are of comparable "hotness" (pressure), yes, the lighter bullet will yield less recoil.

And it is true that it doesn't take much of a velocity drop for a .45 to fail to expand. <soapbox>This is why a subcompact .45 ACP is a very bad idea. I personally will never buy a .45 with anything shorter than a 3.5" barrel.</soapbox>
__________________
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
RobFMJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 05:12 PM   #7
XDTalk 1K Member
 
lobster_roboto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,725
Send a message via AIM to lobster_roboto
Quote:
Originally Posted by portsider44 View Post
not to hijack, just wondering if the 185 or 200 gr have lower felt recoil?
With the 185 grain generally has less recoil. I've noticed "softer" recoils with 230grain wwb jhp rounds vs +p 185 grain jhp loads.
__________________
"Let's go straight to the source and ban crime"
lobster_roboto is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 06:18 PM   #8
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobFMJ View Post
If the loads are of comparable "hotness" (pressure), yes, the lighter bullet will yield less recoil.
And it is true that it doesn't take much of a velocity drop for a .45 to fail to expand. <soapbox>This is why a subcompact .45 ACP is a very bad idea. I personally will never buy a .45 with anything shorter than a 3.5" barrel.</soapbox>
Well not really. If diff. bullet weights are fired at the SAME vel. the heavier bullet will recoil more. It really doesn't have much to do w/ presure of the round. You'll find most 185gr+p loads have more "snap" than std. vel. 230grJHP/FMJ.
I'm old school & still liek the idea of the 1000fps ceiling but todays JHP will reliably expand down to 750fps or so. Even the old school 38sp FBI load of 158grLSWCHP will expand down to 800fps or a bit less. Just about any of the current generation JHP will work fine for SD/HD. Just make sure it's #1 reliable & #2 reasonably accurate in your pistol.
fredj338 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 06:24 PM   #9
XDTalk 1K Member
 
Tally XD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,670
I read on here, from some reliable members opinions, that you should choose the heaviest bullet, regardless of powder load, that is available for your caliber.

That is what I am sticking with until I am convinced its wrong.

Recoil, to me, makes little difference between a few grains or power load. I just think I would rather have a couple of well placed heavy bullets onthe bad guy than a couple of well placed lighter bullets in their place.
__________________
_________________________________________

"My first priority will be to reinstate the assault weapons ban as soon as I take office. In the first year, I intend to work with Congress on a national no carry law, one gun a month purchase limits, and bans on all semi-automatic guns."

-Barack Obama, VPC Fund Raiser, 2007
_________________________________________
Tally XD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 07:08 PM   #10
XDTalk 100 Member
 
BMFOTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 309
Cool Bullet Placement

I agree that a few well placed shots with a heavier bullet is the best bet. However, if the recoil from the heavy bullet prevents me from being able to perform follow up shots with accuracy then I am wasting my time. That is why I am trying to find that middle ground where I can get good stopping power and accuracy of shot placement. I am still new to defensive shooting and do not have the skills to perform double taps with confidence and skill. Thanks to everyone for their responses.
BMFOTP is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:51 PM.


 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

XDTalk is a subsidiary of the Kao Holdings Group
Maintained by Kao Solutions, a subsidiary of the Kao Holdings Group