Quote:
Originally Posted by DNM
What was your take on each setup? Which felt better? Which was most accurate (Bullseye, I assume)?
BTW, you still have all your fingers, correct? 
|
Yes all my fingers are still here luckily.
Bullseye and Unique seemed to group better for me then Titegroup at 50 feet but I only shot 10 rounds of each so it was hard to determine.
Bullseye and Titegroup have a short and snappy recoil when you get over 1150-1200 but are very tame around 1080-1100. I never thought that 50 fps would make that much of a difference in pereceived recoil. Unique, which is a slower powder then the other two, was loaded the hottest but still didn't feel too snappy.
I really need to load up some more of each now that I can keep the fps right around 1100 and work on accuracy and feel. I am going to do groups of 10 as groups of 5 tend to skew the numbers. I went up in grains on Unique but the average FPS went down from yesterday which I attribute to the small sample from yesterday. Also it is a high volume powder and I think I may be slightly compressing it if not right on top of it with the 115s since it takes up 90%+ of the case volume at 5.7 grains.
This is data from yesterday:
String 1 - 115 Rainier - Bullseye 4.3
1) 1117.0 23.9
2) 1106.0 12.9
3) 1102.0 8.9
4) 1104.0 10.9
5) 1087.0 -6.1
6) 1101.0 7.9
7) 1087.0 -6.1

1081.0 -12.1
9) 1076.0 -17.1
10) 1070.0 -23.1
High: 1117.0
Low: 1070.0
E.S.: 47.0
Ave.: 1093.1
S.D.: 15.1
95%: ±11.4
String 2 - 115 Rainier - Titegroup 4.2
1) 1089.0 -18.9
2) 1094.0 -13.9
3) 1107.0 -0.9
4) 1116.0 8.1
5) 1115.0 7.1
6) 1121.0 13.1
7) 1096.0 -11.9

1113.0 5.1
9) 1103.0 -4.9
10) 1125.0 17.1
High: 1125.0
Low: 1089.0
E.S.: 36.0
Ave.: 1107.9
S.D.: 12.1
95%: ±9.1
String 3 - 115 Rainier - Unique 5.7
1) 1110.0 -38.3
2) 1117.0 -31.3
3) 1149.0 0.7
4) 1128.0 -20.3
5) 1134.0 -14.3
6) 1188.0 39.7
7) 1156.0 7.7

1192.0 43.7
9) 1140.0 -8.3
10) 1169.0 20.7
High: 1192.0
Low: 1110.0
E.S.: 82.0
Ave.: 1148.3
S.D.: 28.1
95%: ±21.2