<

Go Back   XDTalk Forums - Your XD/XD(m) Information Source! > Armory Talk > The Ammo Can

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes

Difference between 124 grain and 147 grain?
Old 11-01-2009, 02:42 AM   2 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1
XDTalk Newbie
 
CompactCroatian is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
Difference between 124 grain and 147 grain?

I am wanting to order some Federal HST hollowpoints for my new XD9 SC and I notice there are 2 different grain types, 124 and 147. As I am new to the world of firearms,(this is my first gun of any type) I am not sure how big of a difference there will be between these to grain numbers. I read somewhere that the higher the grain number, the higher the velocity the bullet will leave the barrel at. Is this true? And if so, will the higher velocity of the 147 grain cause a noticeable amount of increased recoil in my 3" SC?

Sorry for my noobishness
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2009, 02:49 AM   #2
XDTalk 100 Member
 
Sport45's Avatar
 
Sport45 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 284
Quote:
Difference between 124 grain and 147 grain?
23 grains.

Actually the heavier 147gr bullet will have less muzzle velocity than the 124gr bullet. There probably won't be a real significant difference in recoil but I'm just guessing because I've never shot either of them. Conventional wisdom says to use lighter bullets in shorter barrels. They are probably also about equally effective so the one you want is the one that feeds the most reliably in your gun.

A grain is a unit of weight and 7000 of them is a pound.

I haven't looked but Federal probably has a web page that lists their tested velocity for these rounds.
__________________
Proud owner of a Ruger Redhawk, S&W 36, S&W 19-5, Sig 226, Colt 1991a1, Springfield 1911a1, SA XD45ACP, Dan Wesson 15-2, Ruger 22/45, Iver Johnson Target Sealed 8, and a few rifles and shotguns.

Last edited by Sport45; 11-01-2009 at 02:51 AM.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2009, 05:20 AM   #3
XDTalk 2K Member
 
Cuda66's Avatar
 
Cuda66 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: McLeod County, MN
Posts: 2,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sport45 View Post
23 grains.

Actually the heavier 147gr bullet will have less muzzle velocity than the 124gr bullet. There probably won't be a real significant difference in recoil but I'm just guessing because I've never shot either of them. Conventional wisdom says to use lighter bullets in shorter barrels. They are probably also about equally effective so the one you want is the one that feeds the most reliably in your gun.

A grain is a unit of weight and 7000 of them is a pound.

I haven't looked but Federal probably has a web page that lists their tested velocity for these rounds.
Once again, conventional wisdom is wrong.

The 147gr rounds are a better choice in shorter barrels; the heavier bullets tend to lose less velocity when fired out of a shorter barrel, and a heavier bullet also tends to have better penetration than a lighter bullet.

I've never really experienced any noticable difference between 147gr and 124gr non+P rounds, even in my G26. However, if recoil is serious consideration (for things such as arthritis, etc), the 147gr round will, all things being equal, have slightly greater recoil.
__________________
No authority can clean up this mess we're in...--Uncle Tupelo, Chickamauga
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2009, 06:41 AM   #4
XDTalk 100 Member
 
*Klutch* is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cedar Grove,NJ
Posts: 179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuda66 View Post
Once again, conventional wisdom is wrong.

The 147gr rounds are a better choice in shorter barrels; the heavier bullets tend to lose less velocity when fired out of a shorter barrel, and a heavier bullet also tends to have better penetration than a lighter bullet.

I've never really experienced any noticable difference between 147gr and 124gr non+P rounds, even in my G26. However, if recoil is serious consideration (for things such as arthritis, etc), the 147gr round will, all things being equal, have slightly greater recoil.
+1 The 147gr would be a better choice because of the 3" barrel. If you can get some 124gr+P they would do the job also but they will pack more punch than the 147gr. In the aire of noob +P= plus Pressure, and that means more recoil but they are not that bad. My only 9mm is a Beretta 92fs and I have both Speer GDGP 147gr and Winchester PDX-1 124+P.
__________________
XD40SC with Trijicons
Glock 26
S&W 642
1937 Mauser K98k
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2009, 06:44 AM   #5
XDTalk 3K Member
 
Mercmar is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuda66 View Post
Once again, conventional wisdom is wrong.

The 147gr rounds are a better choice in shorter barrels; the heavier bullets tend to lose less velocity when fired out of a shorter barrel, and a heavier bullet also tends to have better penetration than a lighter bullet.

I've never really experienced any noticable difference between 147gr and 124gr non+P rounds, even in my G26. However, if recoil is serious consideration (for things such as arthritis, etc), the 147gr round will, all things being equal, have slightly greater recoil.
Don't know about "conventional wisdom", but I do know that lighter bullets are better for shorter barrels in handguns. Heavier bullets don't penetrate better, unless they've had a chance to achieve whatever velocity they penetrate best at...and that ain't from a short barrel.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2009, 09:59 AM   #6
XDTalk 100 Member
 
hotpig is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SW Illinois
Posts: 453
Back in the olden days lighter bullets were needed in shorter barrels. Thanks to modern technology ammo like the Ranger, Gold Dot short barrel and HST are not as velocity dependent as older ammo designs.

You need to try both to see if you and your gun likes them.
__________________
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.”
General George Washington, First President of the United States

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2009, 10:10 AM   #7
XDTalk 500 Member
 
pleasantguywhopacksAXD's Avatar
 
pleasantguywhopacksAXD is online now
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Blanchester, Ohio
Posts: 754
Quote:
Originally Posted by CompactCroatian View Post
I am wanting to order some Federal HST hollowpoints for my new XD9 SC and I notice there are 2 different grain types, 124 and 147. As I am new to the world of firearms,(this is my first gun of any type) I am not sure how big of a difference there will be between these to grain numbers. I read somewhere that the higher the grain number, the higher the velocity the bullet will leave the barrel at. Is this true? And if so, will the higher velocity of the 147 grain cause a noticeable amount of increased recoil in my 3" SC?

Sorry for my noobishness
I shoot them in my 9sc and they expand perfectly. The recoil is slightly more than 119 FMJ. You won't notice it really when the time comes to use it in a SD shooting. Point of impact may rise a bit as in my experience is the nature of going heavier.
147 HST's are designed differently than the old style 147 gr. They will expand at lower velocities. Good round.

This is one from my testing through 4 layers of denim into water jugs. No plugging of the HP cavity. I'm going to do some gell testing this spring.
__________________
Member OFCC, Life Member NRA
ʞɔns sʞɔolƃ
WARNING: The FDA requires all those using glocks that side effects may include: A rose colored appearance of your surroundings. Voices telling them they are invincible. A uncontrolable urge to smash, poke, prod, wet,salt, bury and drop from low flying aircraft said glock, then need to brag uncontrollably.

Last edited by pleasantguywhopacksAXD; 11-01-2009 at 10:13 AM.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2009, 10:34 AM   #8
XDTalk 25K Member
 
AZXD's Avatar
 
AZXD is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Valley of the Gun
Posts: 28,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercmar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuda66 View Post
Once again, conventional wisdom is wrong.

The 147gr rounds are a better choice in shorter barrels; the heavier bullets tend to lose less velocity when fired out of a shorter barrel, and a heavier bullet also tends to have better penetration than a lighter bullet.

I've never really experienced any noticable difference between 147gr and 124gr non+P rounds, even in my G26. However, if recoil is serious consideration (for things such as arthritis, etc), the 147gr round will, all things being equal, have slightly greater recoil.
Don't know about "conventional wisdom", but I do know that lighter bullets are better for shorter barrels in handguns. Heavier bullets don't penetrate better, unless they've had a chance to achieve whatever velocity they penetrate best at...and that ain't from a short barrel.
Have either of you consider the physics side of everything remaining the same, except projectile weight ??

The heavier bullet will be accelerated more slowely slowly, thus allowing for a more complete burn to occur in the shorter barrel, while a lighter bullet will be accelerated more quickly and thus might not provide for a complete powder burn in a given length of barrel.

Because of this, it is my opinion that there is no correct answer concerning which weight of bullet will work best with a given barrel length.

However, if a proper burn rate powder is added to the equation ... Complete powder burn, and thus maximum efficiency will be acheived for a given length of barrel.

Fast burn = Short barrel
Slow burn = Long barrel

At least, that is how I understand things to be.
__________________
Gun control means being able to hit your target. If I have a 'hot button' issue, this is definitely it. Don't even think about taking my guns. My rights are not negotiable, and I am totally unwilling to compromise when it comes to the Second Amendment.
Michael Badnarik
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2009, 11:40 AM   #9
XDTalk 3K Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
fredj338 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZXD View Post
Have either of you consider the physics side of everything remaining the same, except projectile weight ??

The heavier bullet will be accelerated more slowely slowly, thus allowing for a more complete burn to occur in the shorter barrel, while a lighter bullet will be accelerated more quickly and thus might not provide for a complete powder burn in a given length of barrel.

Because of this, it is my opinion that there is no correct answer concerning which weight of bullet will work best with a given barrel length.

However, if a proper burn rate powder is added to the equation ... Complete powder burn, and thus maximum efficiency will be acheived for a given length of barrel.

Fast burn = Short barrel
Slow burn = Long barrel

At least, that is how I understand things to be.
True, but you will always achieve the highest vel. w/ the lighter bullets at max pressures. You may lose less going w/ a 147gr, but the lighter bullets will still leave the shorter bbl going faster. That means a better chance for expansion. I wouldn't want to bet on any 147gr to do well @ 850fps or so, about where std. pressure loads will be in a 3" bbl. Maybe the HSt, maybe the RangerT, but not others. You'll still get 1050fps+ w/ a 124gr+P load & better chance of expansion. Recoil, it's all subjective. I don't think a 9mm in any flavor recoils much. PRobably because I shoot a lot of heavier recoiling rounds like 45acp & 44mag, so any 9mm is light recoiling to me, even in the little G26.
FBI gel tests: Interpretation of FBI gelatin tests These are all from 4" bbls. Expect less vel. from your 3"bbl.
__________________
EVERY GOOD SHOOTER SHOULD BE A HANDLOADER!
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2009, 01:01 PM   #10
XDTalk 1K Member
 
AKSpraya's Avatar
 
AKSpraya is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: King George VA
Posts: 1,990
Blog Entries: 2
Send a message via AIM to AKSpraya
well yesterday I was hunting and after shooting a deer with my muzzleloader I had to shoot the deer again after 10min of waiting for it to die I figured I would put it out of its misery so it wouldn't suffer anymore then it had to I fired 2 rounds (124grn +P Fed HST) from my XD9sc right behind the shoulder it took to breaths and died anyway after skinning it and quartering it I found the 2 HST's right behind the shoulder on the opposite side of the animal so if human skin and bones are anything like a deer I am defenitly confident with the penatration of the 124grn +P HST
__________________
I got a girl you wanna meet her???...her name is 9mm

This is my rifle.
There are many like it, but this one is MINE.
My rifle is my best friend. It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life.
My rifle without me is useless. Without my rifle, I am useless.
Maj. Gen WH Rupertus



 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.xdtalk.com/forums/ammo-can/134658-difference-between-124-grain-147-grain.html
Posted By For Type Date
Difference between 124 grain and 147 grain? - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! This thread Refback 11-01-2009 05:07 PM
XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! This thread Refback 11-01-2009 06:43 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.


vBulletin skins developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
XDTalk & Crossbreed Holsters, LLC